2021 Honda CR-V vs 2021 Toyota RAV4

The 2021 Toyota RAV4 carried a distinctly aggressive appearance that marked a significant departure from its predecessor and most compact crossovers. Its exterior, influenced by traditional SUV designs, featured boxy fender flares, chiseled taillights, and a scowl-like front end that diverged sharply from the friendly facades typical of its ancestors and competitors. This rugged charm allowed it to stand out in the congested family crossover space. Inside, the RAV4 embraced similarly rugged styling cues, like oversized rubberized knobs and hardy door handles that underscored its durability.

Conversely, the 2021 Honda CR-V opted for a more conventional crossover look that blended seamlessly with its segment. Despite subtle distinctions like a unique grille opening and chrome accents, its appearance was largely uniform among competitors. The CR-V shone brighter in color offerings at higher trims, although more vivid colors were scarce on dealership lots. The interior design was angular and modern, contrasting with less adventurous competitors and lending the CR-V a contemporary edge.

The performance of the RAV4 was dominated by its 203-horsepower "Dynamic Force" 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, which balanced high thermal efficiency with a love for high RPMs. While the powertrain was exceptional, the rest of the vehicle struggled to match it, with a transmission that hesitated and steering that lacked tactile feedback. The RAV4 excelled on the highway and proved capable in off-road scenarios thanks to specific models featuring increased ground clearance and all-terrain tires, despite lacking traditional rugged vehicle features like a two-speed transfer case.

The Honda CR-V, equipped with a consistent 190-horsepower turbocharged engine across all trims, provided a smooth and predictable driving experience, albeit without the thrill of rapid acceleration or sporty handling. It used a continuously variable transmission that maintained engine revs consistently, which might deter those seeking a dynamic drive. With standard front-wheel drive and an optional all-wheel-drive system, the CR-V performed solidly, prioritizing comfort and stability over excitement.

Interior space usage was a clear focus for both vehicles. The RAV4 offered comfortable front seating but fell slightly short on rear seat comfort and legroom compared to competitors. It boasted 37.6 cubic feet of cargo space behind the second row, which was impressive but still less than the CR-V. Its user-friendly controls and sensible interior design highlighted functionality suitable for active lifestyles.

The CR-V excelled in maximizing passenger and cargo space, providing 102.9 cubic feet of passenger volume and up to 75.8 cubic feet of total cargo space with the rear seats folded, comfortably leading its class. Through thoughtful design, it facilitated easy access to cargo areas and optional hands-free tailgate functionality on higher trims, underscoring its commitment to practicality and convenience.

Toyota equipped the RAV4 with a robust tech suite that included standard connectivity features like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto across all models. The interface, though not industry-leading, was straightforward and user-friendly, with varying screen sizes depending on the model and optional premium audio systems.

Honda's approach in the CR-V was similarly comprehensive, with a stronger emphasis on infotainment features beginning from mid-tier trims. Base models had limited tech, but the majority of the line-up boasted a 7-inch touchscreen, integrated advanced smartphone connectivity, and enhanced audio systems on higher trims. Notably, the CR-V offered more consistent access to modern tech across its range compared to the base offerings of the RAV4.