Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Chevrolet Blazer EV
Overview | |
Years produced2022-Present | Years produced2024-Present |
MSRP$42,600 | MSRP$44,600 |
Listings8572 | Listings4403 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews8.7 out of 10 | Expert reviews6.2 out of 10 |
Pros
Cons
| Pros
Cons
|
Reviews SummaryIt would appear to be the calendar, not the competition, that has the Ioniq 5 due for a mid-cycle refresh. We liked it when it burst onto the scene as an angular oddball in a sea of soft-lined sameness, and it has only improved over the last few years. Verdict: Hyundai makes minor but welcome changes and avoids tweaking the many things that were working well, successfully making a good thing better. | |
Reviews SummaryThe Chevrolet Blazer EV is a sporty counterpoint to the more affordable Equinox EV. It has more eye-catching style and the performance to back it up, too. This gives new-car shoppers more options at Chevy showrooms. Verdict: Although the Blazer EV offers sportier styling, it doesn’t offer any clear advantages in range or interior space over its competing stablemate, the Equinox EV. | |
No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine168 hp Electric | Engine220 hp Electric |
Drive TrainRWD | Drive TrainFWD |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
EV Battery Capacity63 kWh | EV Battery Capacity85 kWh |
MPG City131 | MPG City114 |
MPG Highway100 | MPG Highway95 |
Battery Charge Time (120V)54 hours | Battery Charge Time (120V) |
Battery Charge Time (240V)5.7 hours | Battery Charge Time (240V) |
Engine | |
Engine Name168 hp Electric | Engine Name220 hp Electric |
Battery Charge Time (120V)54 hours | Battery Charge Time (120V) |
Battery Charge Time (240V)5.7 hours | Battery Charge Time (240V) |
DrivetrainRWD | DrivetrainFWD |
Fuel Economy | |
EV Battery Capacity63 kWh | EV Battery Capacity85 kWh |
MPG City131 | MPG City114 |
MPG Highway100 | MPG Highway95 |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Key Features | |
Navigation SystemStandard | Navigation SystemStandard |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall | Front Crash Overall5 |
Side Crash Overall | Side Crash Overall5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space26.3 cu ft | Cargo Space25.5 cu ft |
Curb Weight4144 lbs | Curb Weight5009 lbs |
Height63.0 in | Height65.1 in |
Length183.3 in | Length192.2 in |
Width74.4 in | Width86.5 in |
Wheelbase118.1 in | Wheelbase121.8 in |
Maximum Payload1081 lbs | Maximum Payload |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Overview | ||
Years produced | 2022-Present | 2024-Present |
MSRP | $42,600 | $44,600 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | ||
Expert reviews | 8.7 out of 10Read full review | 6.2 out of 10Read full review |
Pros & cons | Pros
Cons
| Pros
Cons
|
Summary | It would appear to be the calendar, not the competition, that has the Ioniq 5 due for a mid-cycle refresh. We liked it when it burst onto the scene as an angular oddball in a sea of soft-lined sameness, and it has only improved over the last few years. Verdict: Hyundai makes minor but welcome changes and avoids tweaking the many things that were working well, successfully making a good thing better. | The Chevrolet Blazer EV is a sporty counterpoint to the more affordable Equinox EV. It has more eye-catching style and the performance to back it up, too. This gives new-car shoppers more options at Chevy showrooms. Verdict: Although the Blazer EV offers sportier styling, it doesn’t offer any clear advantages in range or interior space over its competing stablemate, the Equinox EV. |
Video | No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 168 hp Electric | 220 hp Electric |
Drive Train | RWD | FWD |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
EV Battery Capacity | 63 kWh | 85 kWh |
MPG City | 131 | 114 |
MPG Highway | 100 | 95 |
Battery Charge Time (120V) | 54 hours | |
Battery Charge Time (240V) | 5.7 hours | |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 168 hp Electric | 220 hp Electric |
Battery Charge Time (120V) | 54 hours | |
Battery Charge Time (240V) | 5.7 hours | |
Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
Fuel Economy | ||
EV Battery Capacity | 63 kWh | 85 kWh |
MPG City | 131 | 114 |
MPG Highway | 100 | 95 |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Key Features | ||
Navigation System | Standard | Standard |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 5 | |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 26.3 cu ft | 25.5 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 4144 lbs | 5009 lbs |
Height | 63.0 in | 65.1 in |
Length | 183.3 in | 192.2 in |
Width | 74.4 in | 86.5 in |
Wheelbase | 118.1 in | 121.8 in |
Maximum Payload | 1081 lbs | |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
By: CarGurus + AI
At CarGurus, our team of experienced automotive writers remain at the heart of our content operation, conducting hands-on car tests and writing insightful guides that are backed by years of industry experience. To complement this, we are harnessing AI to make our content offering more diverse and more helpful to shoppers than ever. To achieve this, our AI systems are based exclusively on CarGurus content, ratings and data, so that what we produce is both unique to CarGurus, and uniquely helpful to car shoppers.