2025 Acura MDX vs 2024 Hyundai Ioniq 5
Overview | |
MSRP$41,800 | MSRP$51,200 |
Listings253 | Listings213 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews | Expert reviews7.8 out of 10 |
Pros
Cons
| |
2024 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Reviews Summary | |
2025 Acura MDX Reviews SummaryPeople want stylish, reliable, and safe vehicles equipped with simple controls, intuitive technology, and enjoyable driving dynamics. Of course, value is a part of that equation, particularly when it comes to fuel economy. We’re happy to report the refreshed 2025 Acura MDX meets nearly all of those requirements. Furthermore, Acura has apparently gotten the user-experience and user-interface message loud and clear, as the changes to the 2025 MDX reflect a shift to simplicity, sophistication, and refinement. Verdict: This year’s updates make the 2025 Acura MDX more appealing than ever. However, this is not a fuel-efficient choice and the standard V6 engine is somewhat underwhelming. Acura needs to install a hybrid or plug-in hybrid in the MDX as soon as possible if it wants to woo customers shopping in this segment. | |
No video found | |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine168 hp Electric | Engine3.5L 290 hp V6 |
Drive TrainRWD | Drive TrainFWD |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity7 |
Horsepower | Horsepower290 hp @ 6200 rpm |
EV Battery Capacity58 kWh | EV Battery Capacity |
MPG City127 | MPG City19 |
MPG Highway94 | MPG Highway26 |
Battery Charge Time (240V)6 hours | Battery Charge Time (240V) |
Engine | |
Engine Name168 hp Electric | Engine Name3.5L 290 hp V6 |
Torque | Torque267 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm |
Horsepower | Horsepower290 hp @ 6200 rpm |
Battery Charge Time (240V)6 hours | Battery Charge Time (240V) |
DrivetrainRWD | DrivetrainFWD |
Fuel Economy | |
EV Battery Capacity58 kWh | EV Battery Capacity |
MPG City127 | MPG City19 |
MPG Highway94 | MPG Highway26 |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity7 |
Key Features | |
Navigation SystemStandard | Navigation SystemStandard |
Sunroof/Moonroof | Sunroof/MoonroofStandard |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall | Front Crash Overall4 |
Side Crash Overall5 | Side Crash Overall5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space27.2 cu ft | Cargo Space16.3 cu ft |
Curb Weight3968 lbs | Curb Weight4268 lbs |
Height63.0 in | Height67.9 in |
Length182.5 in | Length198.4 in |
Width74.4 in | Width78.7 in |
Wheelbase118.1 in | Wheelbase113.8 in |
Maximum Payload1246 lbs | Maximum Payload1173 lbs |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | Maximum Towing Capacity3500 lbs |
Overview | ||
MSRP | $41,800 | $51,200 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | ||
Expert reviews | 7.8 out of 10Read full review | |
Pros & cons | Pros
Cons
| |
Summary | People want stylish, reliable, and safe vehicles equipped with simple controls, intuitive technology, and enjoyable driving dynamics. Of course, value is a part of that equation, particularly when it comes to fuel economy. We’re happy to report the refreshed 2025 Acura MDX meets nearly all of those requirements. Furthermore, Acura has apparently gotten the user-experience and user-interface message loud and clear, as the changes to the 2025 MDX reflect a shift to simplicity, sophistication, and refinement. Verdict: This year’s updates make the 2025 Acura MDX more appealing than ever. However, this is not a fuel-efficient choice and the standard V6 engine is somewhat underwhelming. Acura needs to install a hybrid or plug-in hybrid in the MDX as soon as possible if it wants to woo customers shopping in this segment. | |
Video | No video found | |
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 168 hp Electric | 3.5L 290 hp V6 |
Drive Train | RWD | FWD |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 7 |
Horsepower | 290 hp @ 6200 rpm | |
EV Battery Capacity | 58 kWh | |
MPG City | 127 | 19 |
MPG Highway | 94 | 26 |
Battery Charge Time (240V) | 6 hours | |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 168 hp Electric | 3.5L 290 hp V6 |
Torque | 267 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm | |
Horsepower | 290 hp @ 6200 rpm | |
Battery Charge Time (240V) | 6 hours | |
Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
Fuel Economy | ||
EV Battery Capacity | 58 kWh | |
MPG City | 127 | 19 |
MPG Highway | 94 | 26 |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 5 | 7 |
Key Features | ||
Navigation System | Standard | Standard |
Sunroof/Moonroof | Standard | |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 4 | |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | 5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 27.2 cu ft | 16.3 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 3968 lbs | 4268 lbs |
Height | 63.0 in | 67.9 in |
Length | 182.5 in | 198.4 in |
Width | 74.4 in | 78.7 in |
Wheelbase | 118.1 in | 113.8 in |
Maximum Payload | 1246 lbs | 1173 lbs |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | 3500 lbs | |
By: CarGurus + AI
At CarGurus, our team of experienced automotive writers remain at the heart of our content operation, conducting hands-on car tests and writing insightful guides that are backed by years of industry experience. To complement this, we are harnessing AI to make our content offering more diverse and more helpful to shoppers than ever. To achieve this, our AI systems are based exclusively on CarGurus content, ratings and data, so that what we produce is both unique to CarGurus, and uniquely helpful to car shoppers.
