Toyota 4Runner vs Toyota FJ Cruiser
Overview | |
Years produced1984-Present | Years produced2007-2014 |
MSRP$42,270 | MSRP$27,680 |
Listings744 | Listings68 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews6.7 out of 10 | Expert reviews |
Pros
Cons
| |
Reviews SummaryShoppers looking for an old-school SUV should be careful what they wish for, because the 4Runner makes compromises in passenger comfort and interior space to make it one of the better off-roaders on the market. It’s offered as a hybrid, but fuel economy is never as good as a typical crossover SUVs, which will be more comfortable and more affordable. That makes mainstream crossovers better choices for most, but for those who want adventure while carrying passengers, the 4Runner makes sense. Verdict: The 4Runner’s closest rivals are the Jeep Wrangler and the Ford Bronco. Compared to them, the 4Runner can carry more passengers and offers better fuel economy thanks to an available hybrid powertrain. If adventure is a priority, then the 4Runner is a great choice, but those who want a five- or seven-passenger SUV for daily family duty would be better off with a crossover. | |
Reviews Summary | |
No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine | Engine4.0L 260 hp V6 |
Drive Train | Drive Train4X2 |
Seating Capacity7 | Seating Capacity5 |
Horsepower | Horsepower260 hp @ 5600 rpm |
MPG City | MPG City16 |
MPG Highway | MPG Highway20 |
Engine | |
Engine Name2.4L 278 hp I4 | Engine Name4.0L 260 hp V6 |
Torque317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm | Torque271 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm |
Horsepower278 hp @ 6000 rpm | Horsepower260 hp @ 5600 rpm |
Drivetrain4X2 | Drivetrain4X2 |
Fuel Economy | |
MPG City | MPG City16 |
MPG Highway | MPG Highway20 |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity7 | Seating Capacity5 |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall4 | Front Crash Overall |
Side Crash Overall5 | Side Crash Overall |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space48.4 cu ft | Cargo Space27.9 cu ft |
Curb Weight4455 lbs | Curb Weight4079 lbs |
Height72.6 in | Height71.3 in |
Length194.9 in | Length183.9 in |
Width78.0 in | Width75.0 in |
Wheelbase112.2 in | Wheelbase105.9 in |
Maximum Payload895 lbs | Maximum Payload1251 lbs |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity6000 lbs | Maximum Towing Capacity5000 lbs |
Standard Towing Capacity6000 lbs | Standard Towing Capacity5000 lbs |
Overview | ||
Years produced | 1984-Present | 2007-2014 |
MSRP | $42,270 | $27,680 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | ||
Expert reviews | 6.7 out of 10Read full review | |
Pros & cons | Pros
Cons
| |
Summary | Shoppers looking for an old-school SUV should be careful what they wish for, because the 4Runner makes compromises in passenger comfort and interior space to make it one of the better off-roaders on the market. It’s offered as a hybrid, but fuel economy is never as good as a typical crossover SUVs, which will be more comfortable and more affordable. That makes mainstream crossovers better choices for most, but for those who want adventure while carrying passengers, the 4Runner makes sense. Verdict: The 4Runner’s closest rivals are the Jeep Wrangler and the Ford Bronco. Compared to them, the 4Runner can carry more passengers and offers better fuel economy thanks to an available hybrid powertrain. If adventure is a priority, then the 4Runner is a great choice, but those who want a five- or seven-passenger SUV for daily family duty would be better off with a crossover. | |
Video | No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 4.0L 260 hp V6 | |
Drive Train | 4X2 | |
Seating Capacity | 7 | 5 |
Horsepower | 260 hp @ 5600 rpm | |
MPG City | 16 | |
MPG Highway | 20 | |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 2.4L 278 hp I4 | 4.0L 260 hp V6 |
Torque | 317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm | 271 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm |
Horsepower | 278 hp @ 6000 rpm | 260 hp @ 5600 rpm |
Drivetrain | 4X2 | 4X2 |
Fuel Economy | ||
MPG City | 16 | |
MPG Highway | 20 | |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 7 | 5 |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 4 | |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 48.4 cu ft | 27.9 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 4455 lbs | 4079 lbs |
Height | 72.6 in | 71.3 in |
Length | 194.9 in | 183.9 in |
Width | 78.0 in | 75.0 in |
Wheelbase | 112.2 in | 105.9 in |
Maximum Payload | 895 lbs | 1251 lbs |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | 6000 lbs | 5000 lbs |
Standard Towing Capacity | 6000 lbs | 5000 lbs |

By: CarGurus + AI
At CarGurus, our team of experienced automotive writers remain at the heart of our content operation, conducting hands-on car tests and writing insightful guides that are backed by years of industry experience. To complement this, we are harnessing AI to make our content offering more diverse and more helpful to shoppers than ever. To achieve this, our AI systems are based exclusively on CarGurus content, ratings and data, so that what we produce is both unique to CarGurus, and uniquely helpful to car shoppers.








































