BMW X1 vs Hyundai Ioniq 5
Overview | |
Years produced2012-Present | Years produced2022-Present |
MSRP$39,100 | MSRP$42,600 |
Listings8472 | Listings8777 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews7.8 out of 10 | Expert reviews8.7 out of 10 |
Pros
Cons
| Pros
Cons
|
Reviews SummaryThe all-new, third-generation X1 is zippy and fun enough to be worthy of the distinction, but with new capability and plenty of cargo space, it’s bringing the utility, too. | |
Reviews SummaryIt would appear to be the calendar, not the competition, that has the Ioniq 5 due for a mid-cycle refresh. We liked it when it burst onto the scene as an angular oddball in a sea of soft-lined sameness, and it has only improved over the last few years. Verdict: Hyundai makes minor but welcome changes and avoids tweaking the many things that were working well, successfully making a good thing better. | |
No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine2.0L 241 hp I4 | Engine168 hp Electric |
Drive TrainAWD | Drive TrainRWD |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Horsepower241 hp @ 4500 rpm | Horsepower |
EV Battery Capacity | EV Battery Capacity63 kWh |
MPG City25 | MPG City131 |
MPG Highway34 | MPG Highway100 |
Battery Charge Time (120V) | Battery Charge Time (120V)54 hours |
Battery Charge Time (240V) | Battery Charge Time (240V)5.7 hours |
Engine | |
Engine Name2.0L 241 hp I4 | Engine Name168 hp Electric |
Torque295 lb-ft @ 1500 rpm | Torque |
Horsepower241 hp @ 4500 rpm | Horsepower |
Battery Charge Time (120V) | Battery Charge Time (120V)54 hours |
Battery Charge Time (240V) | Battery Charge Time (240V)5.7 hours |
DrivetrainAWD | DrivetrainRWD |
Fuel Economy | |
EV Battery Capacity | EV Battery Capacity63 kWh |
MPG City25 | MPG City131 |
MPG Highway34 | MPG Highway100 |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Key Features | |
Navigation SystemStandard | Navigation SystemStandard |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall4 | Front Crash Overall |
Side Crash Overall5 | Side Crash Overall |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space25.7 cu ft | Cargo Space26.3 cu ft |
Curb Weight3750 lbs | Curb Weight4144 lbs |
Height64.6 in | Height63.0 in |
Length177.2 in | Length183.3 in |
Width82.8 in | Width74.4 in |
Wheelbase106.0 in | Wheelbase118.1 in |
Maximum Payload994 lbs | Maximum Payload1081 lbs |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity3500 lbs | Maximum Towing Capacity |
Overview | ||
Years produced | 2012-Present | 2022-Present |
MSRP | $39,100 | $42,600 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | ||
Expert reviews | 7.8 out of 10Read full review | 8.7 out of 10Read full review |
Pros & cons | Pros
Cons
| Pros
Cons
|
Summary | The all-new, third-generation X1 is zippy and fun enough to be worthy of the distinction, but with new capability and plenty of cargo space, it’s bringing the utility, too. | It would appear to be the calendar, not the competition, that has the Ioniq 5 due for a mid-cycle refresh. We liked it when it burst onto the scene as an angular oddball in a sea of soft-lined sameness, and it has only improved over the last few years. Verdict: Hyundai makes minor but welcome changes and avoids tweaking the many things that were working well, successfully making a good thing better. |
Video | No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 2.0L 241 hp I4 | 168 hp Electric |
Drive Train | AWD | RWD |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Horsepower | 241 hp @ 4500 rpm | |
EV Battery Capacity | 63 kWh | |
MPG City | 25 | 131 |
MPG Highway | 34 | 100 |
Battery Charge Time (120V) | 54 hours | |
Battery Charge Time (240V) | 5.7 hours | |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 2.0L 241 hp I4 | 168 hp Electric |
Torque | 295 lb-ft @ 1500 rpm | |
Horsepower | 241 hp @ 4500 rpm | |
Battery Charge Time (120V) | 54 hours | |
Battery Charge Time (240V) | 5.7 hours | |
Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
Fuel Economy | ||
EV Battery Capacity | 63 kWh | |
MPG City | 25 | 131 |
MPG Highway | 34 | 100 |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Key Features | ||
Navigation System | Standard | Standard |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 4 | |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 25.7 cu ft | 26.3 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 3750 lbs | 4144 lbs |
Height | 64.6 in | 63.0 in |
Length | 177.2 in | 183.3 in |
Width | 82.8 in | 74.4 in |
Wheelbase | 106.0 in | 118.1 in |
Maximum Payload | 994 lbs | 1081 lbs |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | 3500 lbs | |
By: CarGurus + AI
At CarGurus, our team of experienced automotive writers remain at the heart of our content operation, conducting hands-on car tests and writing insightful guides that are backed by years of industry experience. To complement this, we are harnessing AI to make our content offering more diverse and more helpful to shoppers than ever. To achieve this, our AI systems are based exclusively on CarGurus content, ratings and data, so that what we produce is both unique to CarGurus, and uniquely helpful to car shoppers.