Cadillac XT5 vs Mazda CX-5
Overview | |
Years produced2013-Present | Years produced2017-Present |
MSRP$29,050 | MSRP$44,195 |
Listings9531 | Listings9110 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews6.5 out of 10 | Expert reviews6.3 out of 10 |
Pros
Cons
| Pros
Cons
|
Reviews SummaryJust because you need more practicality, doesn't necessarily mean you'll have to sacrifice driving enjoyment or performance. Among compact SUVs, the 2025 Mazda CX-5 proves that you can satisfy your sporty appetite in an attractive and upscale alternative. Verdict: The CX-5 offers an enjoyable driving experience, but it falls short in practical areas like fuel economy and cargo space. | |
Reviews SummaryThe Cadillac XT5 offers plenty of the luxury experience for less money and fuss than some of its competitors. Even so, this SUV lacks the driving excitement and engagement that the Europeans offer, and it can’t match the style and tech of the Korean and Japanese brands. If it were our only choice, there’d be little to complain about, but when there are so many other great options in the same segment—including the Lincoln Nautilus, BMW X3, Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class, Genesis GV70, and Porsche Macan—the Cadillac loses some of its shine. | |
No video found | |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine | Engine2.0L 235 hp I4 |
Drive Train | Drive TrainFWD |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Horsepower | Horsepower235 hp @ 5000 rpm |
MPG City | MPG City22 |
MPG Highway | MPG Highway29 |
Engine | |
Engine Name2.5L 187 hp I4 | Engine Name2.0L 235 hp I4 |
Torque185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | Torque258 lb-ft @ 1500 rpm |
Horsepower187 hp @ 6000 rpm | Horsepower235 hp @ 5000 rpm |
DrivetrainAWD | DrivetrainFWD |
Fuel Economy | |
MPG City | MPG City22 |
MPG Highway | MPG Highway29 |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall5 | Front Crash Overall5 |
Side Crash Overall5 | Side Crash Overall5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space30.8 cu ft | Cargo Space30.0 cu ft |
Curb Weight3679 lbs | Curb Weight3915 lbs |
Height66.1 in | Height66.1 in |
Length180.1 in | Length189.6 in |
Width83.3 in | Width74.9 in |
Wheelbase106.2 in | Wheelbase112.5 in |
Maximum Payload1045 lbs | Maximum Payload2086 lbs |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity2000 lbs | Maximum Towing Capacity1000 lbs |
Overview | ||
Years produced | 2013-Present | 2017-Present |
MSRP | $29,050 | $44,195 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | ||
Expert reviews | 6.5 out of 10Read full review | 6.3 out of 10Read full review |
Pros & cons | Pros
Cons
| Pros
Cons
|
Summary | Just because you need more practicality, doesn't necessarily mean you'll have to sacrifice driving enjoyment or performance. Among compact SUVs, the 2025 Mazda CX-5 proves that you can satisfy your sporty appetite in an attractive and upscale alternative. Verdict: The CX-5 offers an enjoyable driving experience, but it falls short in practical areas like fuel economy and cargo space. | The Cadillac XT5 offers plenty of the luxury experience for less money and fuss than some of its competitors. Even so, this SUV lacks the driving excitement and engagement that the Europeans offer, and it can’t match the style and tech of the Korean and Japanese brands. If it were our only choice, there’d be little to complain about, but when there are so many other great options in the same segment—including the Lincoln Nautilus, BMW X3, Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class, Genesis GV70, and Porsche Macan—the Cadillac loses some of its shine. |
Video | No video found | |
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 2.0L 235 hp I4 | |
Drive Train | FWD | |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Horsepower | 235 hp @ 5000 rpm | |
MPG City | 22 | |
MPG Highway | 29 | |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 2.5L 187 hp I4 | 2.0L 235 hp I4 |
Torque | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 258 lb-ft @ 1500 rpm |
Horsepower | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm | 235 hp @ 5000 rpm |
Drivetrain | AWD | FWD |
Fuel Economy | ||
MPG City | 22 | |
MPG Highway | 29 | |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 5 | 5 |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | 5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 30.8 cu ft | 30.0 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 3679 lbs | 3915 lbs |
Height | 66.1 in | 66.1 in |
Length | 180.1 in | 189.6 in |
Width | 83.3 in | 74.9 in |
Wheelbase | 106.2 in | 112.5 in |
Maximum Payload | 1045 lbs | 2086 lbs |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | 2000 lbs | 1000 lbs |
By: CarGurus + AI
At CarGurus, our team of experienced automotive writers remain at the heart of our content operation, conducting hands-on car tests and writing insightful guides that are backed by years of industry experience. To complement this, we are harnessing AI to make our content offering more diverse and more helpful to shoppers than ever. To achieve this, our AI systems are based exclusively on CarGurus content, ratings and data, so that what we produce is both unique to CarGurus, and uniquely helpful to car shoppers.