Nissan Xterra vs Toyota 4Runner
Overview | |
Years produced2000-2015 | Years produced1984-Present |
MSRP$23,660 | MSRP$42,270 |
Listings37 | Listings724 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews | Expert reviews6.7 out of 10 |
Pros
Cons
| |
Reviews Summary | |
Reviews SummaryShoppers looking for an old-school SUV should be careful what they wish for, because the 4Runner makes compromises in passenger comfort and interior space to make it one of the better off-roaders on the market. It’s offered as a hybrid, but fuel economy is never as good as a typical crossover SUVs, which will be more comfortable and more affordable. That makes mainstream crossovers better choices for most, but for those who want adventure while carrying passengers, the 4Runner makes sense. Verdict: The 4Runner’s closest rivals are the Jeep Wrangler and the Ford Bronco. Compared to them, the 4Runner can carry more passengers and offers better fuel economy thanks to an available hybrid powertrain. If adventure is a priority, then the 4Runner is a great choice, but those who want a five- or seven-passenger SUV for daily family duty would be better off with a crossover. | |
No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine4.0L 261 hp V6 | Engine |
Drive Train4X2 | Drive Train |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity7 |
Horsepower261 hp @ 5600 rpm | Horsepower |
MPG City16 | MPG City |
MPG Highway22 | MPG Highway |
Engine | |
Engine Name4.0L 261 hp V6 | Engine Name2.4L 278 hp I4 |
Torque281 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | Torque317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm |
Horsepower261 hp @ 5600 rpm | Horsepower278 hp @ 6000 rpm |
Drivetrain4X2 | Drivetrain4X2 |
Fuel Economy | |
MPG City16 | MPG City |
MPG Highway22 | MPG Highway |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity7 |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall | Front Crash Overall4 |
Side Crash Overall | Side Crash Overall5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space36.3 cu ft | Cargo Space48.4 cu ft |
Curb Weight4148 lbs | Curb Weight4455 lbs |
Height74.9 in | Height72.6 in |
Length178.7 in | Length194.9 in |
Width72.8 in | Width78.0 in |
Wheelbase106.3 in | Wheelbase112.2 in |
Maximum Payload1053 lbs | Maximum Payload895 lbs |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity5000 lbs | Maximum Towing Capacity6000 lbs |
Standard Towing Capacity | Standard Towing Capacity6000 lbs |
Overview | ||
Years produced | 2000-2015 | 1984-Present |
MSRP | $23,660 | $42,270 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | ||
Expert reviews | 6.7 out of 10Read full review | |
Pros & cons | Pros
Cons
| |
Summary | Shoppers looking for an old-school SUV should be careful what they wish for, because the 4Runner makes compromises in passenger comfort and interior space to make it one of the better off-roaders on the market. It’s offered as a hybrid, but fuel economy is never as good as a typical crossover SUVs, which will be more comfortable and more affordable. That makes mainstream crossovers better choices for most, but for those who want adventure while carrying passengers, the 4Runner makes sense. Verdict: The 4Runner’s closest rivals are the Jeep Wrangler and the Ford Bronco. Compared to them, the 4Runner can carry more passengers and offers better fuel economy thanks to an available hybrid powertrain. If adventure is a priority, then the 4Runner is a great choice, but those who want a five- or seven-passenger SUV for daily family duty would be better off with a crossover. | |
Video | No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 4.0L 261 hp V6 | |
Drive Train | 4X2 | |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 7 |
Horsepower | 261 hp @ 5600 rpm | |
MPG City | 16 | |
MPG Highway | 22 | |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 4.0L 261 hp V6 | 2.4L 278 hp I4 |
Torque | 281 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm |
Horsepower | 261 hp @ 5600 rpm | 278 hp @ 6000 rpm |
Drivetrain | 4X2 | 4X2 |
Fuel Economy | ||
MPG City | 16 | |
MPG Highway | 22 | |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 5 | 7 |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 4 | |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 36.3 cu ft | 48.4 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 4148 lbs | 4455 lbs |
Height | 74.9 in | 72.6 in |
Length | 178.7 in | 194.9 in |
Width | 72.8 in | 78.0 in |
Wheelbase | 106.3 in | 112.2 in |
Maximum Payload | 1053 lbs | 895 lbs |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | 5000 lbs | 6000 lbs |
Standard Towing Capacity | 6000 lbs | |

By: CarGurus + AI
At CarGurus, our team of experienced automotive writers remain at the heart of our content operation, conducting hands-on car tests and writing insightful guides that are backed by years of industry experience. To complement this, we are harnessing AI to make our content offering more diverse and more helpful to shoppers than ever. To achieve this, our AI systems are based exclusively on CarGurus content, ratings and data, so that what we produce is both unique to CarGurus, and uniquely helpful to car shoppers.






































