Cadillac CTS vs Chrysler 200
Overview | |
MSRP$45,560 | MSRP$21,995 |
Average price$14,546 | Average price$9,783 |
Listings1315 | Listings2104 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews8.3 out of 10 | Expert reviews8.2 out of 10 |
Reviews SummaryEvery brand needs to undergo occasional makeovers to keep its product portfolio relevant. Brands like Lexus and Jaguar have been doing this the last 5 to 10 years, but the brand that took it upon itself to reinvent its image, and the car that started it all, was the CTS. It arrived in 2002 and was the first truly modern Cadillac. Unlike its big land-barge predecessors, the CTS was taut and featured angular styling and forward-looking engines and technology. Each successive generation of the CTS has seen an evolution of the angles, the powertrains, and the tech, culminating with this car: the 2016 Cadillac CTS. The third generation of the CTS is the largest, most refined, and most high-tech version of the car to date. The third generation of the CTS debuted for the 2015 model year, and is largely carried over to 2016, save for a few key updates. | |
Reviews SummaryThe 2015 Chrysler 200 looks and feels terrific. While small rear seats and poor outward visibility might give some potential buyers pause, and though a few tweaks might be necessary to make the driving experience a little more satisfying, Chrysler’s effort to make the 200 into a world-class family sedan is an overall success. | |
No video found | |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine2.0L 268 hp I4 | Engine2.4L 184 hp I4 |
Drive TrainRWD | Drive TrainFWD |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Horsepower268 hp @ 5600 rpm | Horsepower184 hp @ 6250 rpm |
MPG City21 | MPG City23 |
MPG Highway31 | MPG Highway36 |
Engine | |
Engine Name2.0L 268 hp I4 | Engine Name2.4L 184 hp I4 |
Torque295 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm | Torque173 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm |
Horsepower268 hp @ 5600 rpm | Horsepower184 hp @ 6250 rpm |
DrivetrainRWD | DrivetrainFWD |
Fuel Economy | |
MPG City21 | MPG City23 |
MPG Highway31 | MPG Highway36 |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall5 | Front Crash Overall5 |
Side Crash Overall5 | Side Crash Overall5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space13.7 cu ft | Cargo Space16.0 cu ft |
Curb Weight3646 lbs | Curb Weight3473 lbs |
Height57.2 in | Height54.9 in |
Length195.5 in | Length192.3 in |
Width80.8 in | Width73.6 in |
Wheelbase114.6 in | Wheelbase108.9 in |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity1000 lbs | Maximum Towing Capacity |
Overview | ||
MSRP | $45,560 | $21,995 |
Average price | $14,546 | $9,783 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Expert reviews | 8.3 out of 10Read full review | 8.2 out of 10Read full review |
Pros & cons | ||
Summary | Every brand needs to undergo occasional makeovers to keep its product portfolio relevant. Brands like Lexus and Jaguar have been doing this the last 5 to 10 years, but the brand that took it upon itself to reinvent its image, and the car that started it all, was the CTS. It arrived in 2002 and was the first truly modern Cadillac. Unlike its big land-barge predecessors, the CTS was taut and featured angular styling and forward-looking engines and technology. Each successive generation of the CTS has seen an evolution of the angles, the powertrains, and the tech, culminating with this car: the 2016 Cadillac CTS. The third generation of the CTS is the largest, most refined, and most high-tech version of the car to date. The third generation of the CTS debuted for the 2015 model year, and is largely carried over to 2016, save for a few key updates. | The 2015 Chrysler 200 looks and feels terrific. While small rear seats and poor outward visibility might give some potential buyers pause, and though a few tweaks might be necessary to make the driving experience a little more satisfying, Chrysler’s effort to make the 200 into a world-class family sedan is an overall success. |
Video | No video found | |
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 2.0L 268 hp I4 | 2.4L 184 hp I4 |
Drive Train | RWD | FWD |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Horsepower | 268 hp @ 5600 rpm | 184 hp @ 6250 rpm |
MPG City | 21 | 23 |
MPG Highway | 31 | 36 |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 2.0L 268 hp I4 | 2.4L 184 hp I4 |
Torque | 295 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm | 173 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm |
Horsepower | 268 hp @ 5600 rpm | 184 hp @ 6250 rpm |
Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
Fuel Economy | ||
MPG City | 21 | 23 |
MPG Highway | 31 | 36 |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 5 | 5 |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | 5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 13.7 cu ft | 16.0 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 3646 lbs | 3473 lbs |
Height | 57.2 in | 54.9 in |
Length | 195.5 in | 192.3 in |
Width | 80.8 in | 73.6 in |
Wheelbase | 114.6 in | 108.9 in |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | 1000 lbs | |
By: CarGurus + AI
This car comparison has been created with using generative AI. It is based entirely on CarGurus expert review content, ratings and data, and leverages our extensive library of hands-on product tests to create thousands of unique comparisons to help shoppers choose the right car.