2020 Nissan Kicks vs 2021 Honda CR-V
Overview | |
MSRP$19,070 | MSRP$25,350 |
Average price$17,196 | Average price$26,806 |
Listings941 | Listings3977 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews | Expert reviews7.8 out of 10 |
Pros
| |
2020 Nissan Kicks Reviews Summary | |
2021 Honda CR-V Reviews SummaryEven in a grim year, Honda is selling a staggering number of CR-Vs. The CR-V is the best-selling Honda by far. It’s also the second best-selling compact SUV, just behind the Toyota RAV4. And it's the fifth best-selling vehicle in the U.S., and if you take out all the commercial sales of full-size pickups it’s one of the two best-selling vehicles year in and year out. So it’s hard to argue against the CR-V formula. Honda’s been at this almost as long as crossovers have been a thing, launching the CR-V in 1997—a year after the RAV4 debuted. The funny thing is, aside from sales volume, there’s only one thing the CR-V particularly excels at. Aesthetics are subjective, but it would be hard to argue the CR-V is the best looking vehicle in its class. It’s not the cheapest. It’s not the best equipped, especially at the middle to lower trim levels. It’s not the fastest, nor is it the quietest, or the most fuel efficient. It’s not even the most reliable, showing up nowhere in J.D. Power's Most Reliable list. So what makes it so appealing to American consumers? Let’s see if we can figure that out. | |
No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine1.6L 122 hp I4 | Engine1.5L 190 hp I4 |
Drive TrainFWD | Drive TrainFWD |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Horsepower122 hp @ 6300 rpm | Horsepower190 hp @ 5600 rpm |
MPG City31 | MPG City28 |
MPG Highway36 | MPG Highway34 |
Engine | |
Engine Name1.6L 122 hp I4 | Engine Name1.5L 190 hp I4 |
Torque114 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | Torque179 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm |
Horsepower122 hp @ 6300 rpm | Horsepower190 hp @ 5600 rpm |
DrivetrainFWD | DrivetrainFWD |
Fuel Economy | |
MPG City31 | MPG City28 |
MPG Highway36 | MPG Highway34 |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall4 | Front Crash Overall5 |
Side Crash Overall5 | Side Crash Overall5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space25.3 cu ft | Cargo Space39.2 cu ft |
Curb Weight2691 lbs | Curb Weight3337 lbs |
Height62.4 in | Height66.1 in |
Length169.1 in | Length182.1 in |
Width69.3 in | Width73.0 in |
Wheelbase103.1 in | Wheelbase104.8 in |
Maximum Payload925 lbs | Maximum Payload1358 lbs |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | Maximum Towing Capacity1500 lbs |
Overview | ||
MSRP | $19,070 | $25,350 |
Average price | $17,196 | $26,806 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Expert reviews | 7.8 out of 10Read full review | |
Pros & cons | Pros
| |
Summary | Even in a grim year, Honda is selling a staggering number of CR-Vs. The CR-V is the best-selling Honda by far. It’s also the second best-selling compact SUV, just behind the Toyota RAV4. And it's the fifth best-selling vehicle in the U.S., and if you take out all the commercial sales of full-size pickups it’s one of the two best-selling vehicles year in and year out. So it’s hard to argue against the CR-V formula. Honda’s been at this almost as long as crossovers have been a thing, launching the CR-V in 1997—a year after the RAV4 debuted. The funny thing is, aside from sales volume, there’s only one thing the CR-V particularly excels at. Aesthetics are subjective, but it would be hard to argue the CR-V is the best looking vehicle in its class. It’s not the cheapest. It’s not the best equipped, especially at the middle to lower trim levels. It’s not the fastest, nor is it the quietest, or the most fuel efficient. It’s not even the most reliable, showing up nowhere in J.D. Power's Most Reliable list. So what makes it so appealing to American consumers? Let’s see if we can figure that out. | |
Video | No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 1.6L 122 hp I4 | 1.5L 190 hp I4 |
Drive Train | FWD | FWD |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Horsepower | 122 hp @ 6300 rpm | 190 hp @ 5600 rpm |
MPG City | 31 | 28 |
MPG Highway | 36 | 34 |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 1.6L 122 hp I4 | 1.5L 190 hp I4 |
Torque | 114 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | 179 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm |
Horsepower | 122 hp @ 6300 rpm | 190 hp @ 5600 rpm |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
Fuel Economy | ||
MPG City | 31 | 28 |
MPG Highway | 36 | 34 |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 4 | 5 |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | 5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 25.3 cu ft | 39.2 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 2691 lbs | 3337 lbs |
Height | 62.4 in | 66.1 in |
Length | 169.1 in | 182.1 in |
Width | 69.3 in | 73.0 in |
Wheelbase | 103.1 in | 104.8 in |
Maximum Payload | 925 lbs | 1358 lbs |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | 1500 lbs | |
By: CarGurus + AI
This car comparison has been created with using generative AI. It is based entirely on CarGurus expert review content, ratings and data, and leverages our extensive library of hands-on product tests to create thousands of unique comparisons to help shoppers choose the right car.