2020 GMC Acadia vs 2019 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport
Overview | |
MSRP$20,945 | MSRP$29,800 |
Listings157 | Listings763 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews | Expert reviews7.0 out of 10 |
Pros
Cons
| |
2019 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport Reviews Summary | |
2020 GMC Acadia Reviews SummaryLong story short, as a friend of mine likes to say, GMC screwed up. This is just my opinion, of course, but when GMC redesigned the Acadia for the 2017 model year, the SUV shrank in size and switched to a softer look in order to plug a huge hole in the Buick-GMC SUV lineup. Fast-forward to 2020, and GMC may have decided this move was a bad idea. As part of a refresh, the new Acadia adopts bolder styling and adds a new AT4 trim level with greater off-roading capability. Additional changes include the availability of a new turbocharged four-cylinder engine, a new nine-speed automatic transmission, and new and updated technology. These revisions do help the Acadia to better stand out in what is now an ocean of midsize SUVs, from Hyundai to Kia and Honda to Toyota, and everything in between, but it’s up to GMC to make people aware of this fundamentally good, but oh-so-vanilla SUV. And the company must also address the Acadia’s questionable value. | |
No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine2.0L 148 hp I4 | Engine2.5L 193 hp I4 |
Drive TrainFWD | Drive TrainFWD |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity7 |
Horsepower148 hp @ 6000 rpm | Horsepower193 hp @ 6300 rpm |
MPG City24 | MPG City21 |
MPG Highway30 | MPG Highway27 |
Engine | |
Engine Name2.0L 148 hp I4 | Engine Name2.5L 193 hp I4 |
Torque145 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm | Torque188 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm |
Horsepower148 hp @ 6000 rpm | Horsepower193 hp @ 6300 rpm |
DrivetrainFWD | DrivetrainFWD |
Fuel Economy | |
MPG City24 | MPG City21 |
MPG Highway30 | MPG Highway27 |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity7 |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall4 | Front Crash Overall5 |
Side Crash Overall5 | Side Crash Overall5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space21.7 cu ft | Cargo Space12.8 cu ft |
Curb Weight3109 lbs | Curb Weight3923 lbs |
Height64.8 in | Height66.7 in |
Length171.9 in | Length193.4 in |
Width71.3 in | Width75.4 in |
Wheelbase105.1 in | Wheelbase112.5 in |
Maximum Payload1234 lbs | Maximum Payload2078 lbs |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Overview | ||
MSRP | $20,945 | $29,800 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | ||
Expert reviews | 7.0 out of 10Read full review | |
Pros & cons | Pros
Cons
| |
Summary | Long story short, as a friend of mine likes to say, GMC screwed up. This is just my opinion, of course, but when GMC redesigned the Acadia for the 2017 model year, the SUV shrank in size and switched to a softer look in order to plug a huge hole in the Buick-GMC SUV lineup. Fast-forward to 2020, and GMC may have decided this move was a bad idea. As part of a refresh, the new Acadia adopts bolder styling and adds a new AT4 trim level with greater off-roading capability. Additional changes include the availability of a new turbocharged four-cylinder engine, a new nine-speed automatic transmission, and new and updated technology. These revisions do help the Acadia to better stand out in what is now an ocean of midsize SUVs, from Hyundai to Kia and Honda to Toyota, and everything in between, but it’s up to GMC to make people aware of this fundamentally good, but oh-so-vanilla SUV. And the company must also address the Acadia’s questionable value. | |
Video | No video found | No video found |
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 2.0L 148 hp I4 | 2.5L 193 hp I4 |
Drive Train | FWD | FWD |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 7 |
Horsepower | 148 hp @ 6000 rpm | 193 hp @ 6300 rpm |
MPG City | 24 | 21 |
MPG Highway | 30 | 27 |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 2.0L 148 hp I4 | 2.5L 193 hp I4 |
Torque | 145 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm | 188 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm |
Horsepower | 148 hp @ 6000 rpm | 193 hp @ 6300 rpm |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
Fuel Economy | ||
MPG City | 24 | 21 |
MPG Highway | 30 | 27 |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 5 | 7 |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 4 | 5 |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | 5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 21.7 cu ft | 12.8 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 3109 lbs | 3923 lbs |
Height | 64.8 in | 66.7 in |
Length | 171.9 in | 193.4 in |
Width | 71.3 in | 75.4 in |
Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 112.5 in |
Maximum Payload | 1234 lbs | 2078 lbs |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
By: CarGurus + AI
At CarGurus, our team of experienced automotive writers remain at the heart of our content operation, conducting hands-on car tests and writing insightful guides that are backed by years of industry experience. To complement this, we are harnessing AI to make our content offering more diverse and more helpful to shoppers than ever. To achieve this, our AI systems are based exclusively on CarGurus content, ratings and data, so that what we produce is both unique to CarGurus, and uniquely helpful to car shoppers.