2024 Ford Ranger vs 2023 Ford F-150 Lightning
Overview | |
MSRP$49,995 | MSRP$32,720 |
Average price$52,699 | Average price$46,356 |
Listings525 | Listings9023 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews | Expert reviews7.2 out of 10 |
Pros
| |
2023 Ford F-150 Lightning Reviews Summary | |
2024 Ford Ranger Reviews SummaryWhile Ford outsells all other brands with its full-size pickup trucks, it's dead last in the midsize class. The Ranger, once the king of small trucks, sold terribly after Ford relaunched it for the 2019 model year. The smaller Maverick outsold the Ranger by three to one in 2023. For 2024, the new Ranger brings more of everything—power, tech, refinement, space, and most importantly, choice. Is it too late for Ford to catch up? We tested a Ranger XLT to find out. Verdict: With new V6 engines and a Raptor trim, the 2024 Ford Ranger offers greater choice and capability to finally match the Chevrolet Colorado, GMC Canyon, Nissan Frontier, and Toyota Tacoma. | |
No video found | |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine452 hp Electric | Engine2.3L 270 hp I4 |
Drive TrainAWD | Drive Train4X2 |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
EV Battery Capacity98 kWh | EV Battery Capacity |
MPG City76 | MPG City21 |
MPG Highway61 | MPG Highway25 |
Battery Charge Time (120V)95 hours | Battery Charge Time (120V) |
Battery Charge Time (240V)15 hours | Battery Charge Time (240V) |
Engine | |
Engine Name452 hp Electric | Engine Name2.3L 270 hp I4 |
Battery Charge Time (120V)95 hours | Battery Charge Time (120V) |
Battery Charge Time (240V)15 hours | Battery Charge Time (240V) |
DrivetrainAWD | Drivetrain4X2 |
Fuel Economy | |
EV Battery Capacity98 kWh | EV Battery Capacity |
EV Battery Capacity131 kWh | EV Battery Capacity |
research.car_comparison.comparison_table.title.battery_range320 Miles | research.car_comparison.comparison_table.title.battery_range |
MPG City76 | MPG City21 |
MPG Highway61 | MPG Highway25 |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Key Features | |
Navigation SystemStandard | Navigation System |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall4 | Front Crash Overall |
Side Crash Overall5 | Side Crash Overall |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Bed Length67.1 in | Bed Length59.6 in |
Cargo Space14.1 cu ft | Cargo Space |
Curb Weight6015 lbs | Curb Weight4203 lbs |
Height78.3 in | Height74.0 in |
Length232.7 in | Length210.6 in |
Width96.0 in | Width86.7 in |
Wheelbase145.5 in | Wheelbase128.7 in |
Maximum Payload2235 lbs | Maximum Payload1805 lbs |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity10000 lbs | Maximum Towing Capacity7500 lbs |
Standard Towing Capacity5000 lbs | Standard Towing Capacity3500 lbs |
Overview | ||
MSRP | $49,995 | $32,720 |
Average price | $52,699 | $46,356 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Expert reviews | 7.2 out of 10Read full review | |
Pros & cons | Pros
| |
Summary | While Ford outsells all other brands with its full-size pickup trucks, it's dead last in the midsize class. The Ranger, once the king of small trucks, sold terribly after Ford relaunched it for the 2019 model year. The smaller Maverick outsold the Ranger by three to one in 2023. For 2024, the new Ranger brings more of everything—power, tech, refinement, space, and most importantly, choice. Is it too late for Ford to catch up? We tested a Ranger XLT to find out. Verdict: With new V6 engines and a Raptor trim, the 2024 Ford Ranger offers greater choice and capability to finally match the Chevrolet Colorado, GMC Canyon, Nissan Frontier, and Toyota Tacoma. | |
Video | No video found | |
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 452 hp Electric | 2.3L 270 hp I4 |
Drive Train | AWD | 4X2 |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
EV Battery Capacity | 98 kWh | |
MPG City | 76 | 21 |
MPG Highway | 61 | 25 |
Battery Charge Time (120V) | 95 hours | |
Battery Charge Time (240V) | 15 hours | |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 452 hp Electric | 2.3L 270 hp I4 |
Battery Charge Time (120V) | 95 hours | |
Battery Charge Time (240V) | 15 hours | |
Drivetrain | AWD | 4X2 |
Fuel Economy | ||
EV Battery Capacity | 98 kWh | |
EV Battery Capacity | 131 kWh | |
research.car_comparison.comparison_table.title.battery_range | 320 Miles | |
MPG City | 76 | 21 |
MPG Highway | 61 | 25 |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Key Features | ||
Navigation System | Standard | |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 4 | |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Bed Length | 67.1 in | 59.6 in |
Cargo Space | 14.1 cu ft | |
Curb Weight | 6015 lbs | 4203 lbs |
Height | 78.3 in | 74.0 in |
Length | 232.7 in | 210.6 in |
Width | 96.0 in | 86.7 in |
Wheelbase | 145.5 in | 128.7 in |
Maximum Payload | 2235 lbs | 1805 lbs |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | 10000 lbs | 7500 lbs |
Standard Towing Capacity | 5000 lbs | 3500 lbs |
By: CarGurus + AI
At CarGurus, our team of experienced automotive writers remain at the heart of our content operation, conducting hands-on car tests and writing insightful guides that are backed by years of industry experience. To complement this, we are harnessing AI to make our content offering more diverse and more helpful to shoppers than ever. To achieve this, our AI systems are based exclusively on CarGurus content, ratings and data, so that what we produce is both unique to CarGurus, and uniquely helpful to car shoppers.