Have you driven a 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class?  

User Reviews

View reviews where users commented on categories.

Clear selections

Displaying 11 - 17 of 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class 17 reviews.

2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK 230 Kompressor SuperchargedReview
Evans writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Kick Ass Girl's Sport Car — Love it! Didn't think can affort 2 MB in the garage. But it was a great deal, can't pass it up. Solid performance, runs like the ML on the highway. Considered the size of the car, great stuff. For a 5 feet wife, perfectly comfortable; for a 6 feet husband, takes a little adjustment on the seats. Who said a chick can't have a sport car. This is awsome for the fact that now chick can kick some asses with style and speed. It's definitely a fun car to drive. (Especially watching the top goes up and down. I can stand on the driveway and watch the top goes up and down...

Pros: Review across the board is 4.5 or more out of 5, need I say more?

Cons: If you are 6 feet or taller, go with the CLK...

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK 230 Kompressor SuperchargedReview
Joshua writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

The Batmobile — I first saw this car and the first thing that came to my head was Batmobile. That's what it looks like to me in my opinion. I can go on and on and on about how awesome the brakes on this car are and how much fun it is to drive. It saddens me that Mercedes Benz replaced the 4 cylinder supercharged engine with a V6 now.

Pros: Fun to drive. Awesome performance from entire car.

Cons: Can't put top down while car is in motion.

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK 230 Kompressor SuperchargedReview
Diane writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Slk 230 - Lil Ripper — Bought the best colour for resale - Silver; has a great set of Pirellis; could do with more grunt of course. Brakes ok, starting to pull a bit but needs it's service - and rego this week. Happy for the time being, until an SL 55 AMG comes along....(sorry baby- you didn't hear that). Great black leather interior. Don't drive it much now due to employment changes - take ferry instead; but is fair on fuel. Hard top over soft top anyday - especially with harsh sunlight. Handles well, I should know, after driving home 7 hours through central nsw! Great through Victoria Pass in Blue Mtns - just watch out for boys in blue waiting at Blackheath. Overall, still running like a demon and many clicks to go...

Pros: Colour, hard top, size, easy to park, zippy

Cons: small - for shopping, moving etc, and only one passenger.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32Review
Ethan writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Awesome, Stunning Convertible — A fully capable car that has plenty of speed, handling, and fuel efficiency. It is sleek and gorgeous.

Pros: fast, good looking, gas milage,

Cons: high insurance rates, high payments, lots of tickets

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32 Review
GuruWS3BV says:
vs2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32
2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32 winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
Back Seats Ranked 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32 better.
"n/a"
Would Buy Ranked 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32 better.
"n/a"
2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK 320 Review
GuruWS3BV says:
vs2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32
2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK 320 winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
Back Seats Ranked 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32 better.
"n/a"
Would Buy Ranked 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32 better.
"n/a"
2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32 Review
Guru5YGJ8 says:
vs2003 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32
2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32 winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
Back Seats Ranked 2003 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32 better.
"no back seats in SLK 32 AMG cars"
Value Ranked 2003 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class SLK AMG 32 better.
"less $$$"

Displaying 11 - 17 of 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class 17 reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2016 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Reviews

Review By Guru9D4HLN

Very nice Roadster! 3.5 L Engine has plenty of power and handles excellent in sport mode Read More

Review By Constantine

It has very good aceleration. However, there are three negative points for me: (1) terrible right blind spot, (3) absence of rear view camera or blind spot camera and (3) road noise was high. Read More

2015 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Reviews

Review By Guru9T9BND

Love it!! As described, in excellent shape and great value. Read More

Review By Guru9ZG9VK

it had everything i wanted, and i like the color. Read More

2014 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Reviews

Review By Guru9DR415

Great car! The SLK is not a gut-busting muscle car. It and its brother the SL are refined sports-cars for people of an age whose days of harsh rides, loud exhausts, marginal convenience features, an... Read More

Review By Heidi

Fun...peppy.. sexy...too cool for school. Dont miss a thing, doubt I will. Read More

2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Reviews

Review By Guru5M71B

If you’re looking for a roadster that handles the road well and the feels like a luxury car - this is a great choice. Read More

2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class Reviews

Review By Dav48kaz

New model year. Great features and good value Similar to a Boxter Read More

Review By Joe

The is what I have been looking 4 and the price was just Wright Read More

SLK-Class

Looking for a Used SLK-Class in your area?

CarGurus has 455 nationwide SLK-Class listings starting at $2,900.

ZIP:
Have you driven a 2004 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class?