Have you driven a 2003 Jaguar S-TYPE?  

User Reviews

View reviews where users commented on categories.

Clear selections

Displaying 1 - 10 of 2003 Jaguar S-TYPE 10 reviews.

2003 Jaguar S-TYPEReview
Jim writes:
Overall:

It’s a very nice clean car, well taken care of.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
2003 Jaguar S-TYPEReview
Michael writes:
Overall:

I was told that the transmission is not in good condition

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
2003 Jaguar S-TYPEReview
manuel writes:
Overall:

Good model good stable car I have a 2004 like it

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Jaguar S-TYPEReview
Guru6FTC9 writes:
Overall:

Love the car from the time made need to come up with a up to date version

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Jaguar S-TYPEReview
Maurice writes:
Overall:

Nice car looks good its worth the money

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
2003 Jaguar S-TYPE 4.2L V8 RWD Review
Cenk says:
In one word it is a really cool and stable car. Even it was older 10 years, people on the street were keeping me saying that my car was so elegant and cool...
vs2000 BMW 5 Series
2003 Jaguar S-TYPE 4.2L V8 RWD winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
Looks/Style Ranked 2000 BMW 5 Series worse.
"Actually both of these cars look really good but Jaguar looks more elegant and I think its style will always be classical..."
Family Car Ranked 2000 BMW 5 Series worse.
"I felt more safe in Jaguar."
7 of 9 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Jaguar S-TYPE Review
JedTaylor777 says:
The car is a better all round car, the only consideration that the 300 has is the cost efficiency for repairs. It cost less to maintain the Chrysler 300 than the jaguar
vs2004 Chrysler 300M
2003 Jaguar S-TYPE winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
4 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Jaguar S-TYPE Review
jag2003 says:
Nice car V8 has super quick pick up
vs2003 Mercedes-Benz E-Class
2003 Jaguar S-TYPE winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
Looks/Style Ranked 2003 Mercedes-Benz E-Class better.
"It looks bigger from the outside"
Family Car Ranked 2003 Mercedes-Benz E-Class better.
"The back seat have more room"
2 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Jaguar S-TYPE 3.0L V6 RWDReview
KJohn423 writes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

Stylish Sport Vehicle — Just acquired this vehicle less than 2wks ago. It took me a half day just 2 locate the low side port 4 the AC, but other than that, I'm enjoying the experience. I can't wait 2 really open it up on the highway.

Pros: Elegant

Cons: Plastic gaskets

5 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Jaguar S-TYPE 3.0L V6 RWDReview
sklaszky writes:
Accessories:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Interior Noise:
Long Trips:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Ride Comfort:
Safety:
Looks/Style:
Visibility:
Overall:

Fabulous Touring Car. — I love almost everything about this car. It has put the joy back into driving again, especially on long distance trips. At 70 mph I can have a quiet conversation with a passenger without having to speak loudly, as I did in my '96 Avalon.

Primary Use: Family transportation

Pros: Lots of luxury, feels like you're piloting a small rocket ship. Uses many Ford / Lincoln components (less expensive than Jag branded parts). Good highway gas mileage. Extremely quiet inside. Classic Jaguar good looks.

Cons: Small trunk. Parts and repairs can be expensive just because it's a Jag. Mediocre gas mileage around town.

5 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying 1 - 10 of 2003 Jaguar S-TYPE 10 reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2008 Jaguar S-TYPE Reviews

Review By sol

I like it but a few cosmetic things the front panel the wood is in bad condition Read More

Review By Edward

The Jaguar S-type for is a great car as long you keep up the maintenance such as tune-ups, oil changes with top grade oil, Mobile One, wheel alignments, transmission service and all basic check list f... Read More

2007 Jaguar S-TYPE Reviews

Review By Guru8JFZQ

Its just a car that I like a lot. Parts are easy to get because this car was owned by Ford at the time. Maybe other folks prefer some other model, good for them, everyone cant like the same thing, tha... Read More

2006 Jaguar S-TYPE Reviews

Review By Guru9PBLK4

As long as it’s the 3.0 engine this is a fine car. Read More

Review By Patsy

Jaguar S has a smooth look and I love driving them. Its sweet and classy Read More

2005 Jaguar S-TYPE Reviews

Review By Guru9KVRHF

The car is not value! For $7.995. Missing CD-CHANGER, under hood crack plastic covering, dirty all over the car, engine dirty, interior dirty, no one know if the blue-tooth or GPS work. The car seems ... Read More

Review By Adam

I love the look. I also really like the handling and the color as well. Read More

2004 Jaguar S-TYPE Reviews

Review By Dexter

Good car ,nothing is missing, except me behind the wheel Read More

Review By Gary

I have driven a 2004 S type for 9 years now with relatively few problems and a minimum of maintenance costs. Granted I do not commute to work and use it for occasional trips to the supermarket and ma... Read More

S-TYPE

Looking for a Used S-TYPE in your area?

CarGurus has 99 nationwide S-TYPE listings starting at $1,500.

ZIP:
Have you driven a 2003 Jaguar S-TYPE?