Have you driven a 1995 Volvo 460?  

User Reviews

Displaying all 1995 Volvo 460 reviews reviews.

1995 Volvo 460Review
Ulrik writes:

Good Car But Don't Expect It To Be A Sportscar. — Performance is virtually non existing. It is kind of slow, the braking is acceptable and the handling is horrible (I have to mount a rear roll bar.) I made quite a lot of repairs on the car, intake gasket changed, changed the brakes all the way around. had to change both left wheel bearings. Changed the left driveshaft boot. The appearance. Well it's a Volvo, It is designed like a brick. One really good thing about it is that it is a very practical car, the boot is huge for the size of the car and you can fit 5 grown up men in it. Cost of ownership. The spare parts are quite expensive but it does around 13km/l so that is alright. Fun Factor. Non existing, it almost killed my enthusiasm for cars.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: very roomy, cheap to buy, quite good mileage

Cons: Slow, expensive spare parts.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Looking for a Used 460 in your area?

CarGurus has thousands of nationwide listings and the tools to find you a great deal.

1995 Volvo 460Review
Sauli writes:

Solid Basics — - Performance: Nothing surprising in it's performance; about 8-9s 0-100km/h, nothing wrong with brakes.. Handling is precise, even too precise when driving 60km/h or faster. - Build Quality: Only some minor repairs; right front door's footlist detached, left side mirror's adjustment plug snaped. Ofcourse there's been some normal repairs for a car this old, such as dampers, engine seals, gearbox was replaced some while ago, etc.. - Appearance: I'd say this looks better from outside than inside, though both interior and exterior are very basic looking. - Cost of Ownership: Eats oil as any older car, and consumes about 6-7l/100km on highway speeds. - Fun Factor: Not really; this car is for old people, who enjoy calm (slow) and easy rides. Only have this as temporary vehicle at the moment.

Pros: Cheap to maintain, good build quality, very good in low temperatures areas (no troubles in starting the engine, and warms up quickly).

Cons: Too sloppy handling at speeds greater than city limit, lack of performance.

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying all 1995 Volvo 460 reviews reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

1994 Volvo 460 Reviews

Car For A Lifetime... Can't Sell It. By RGK

Good looking, confortable car, relatively good driving. Slow acceleration response, low mileage (no more than 6 Km/liter), rather squeaky for my taste. Worst part: forward train b/c the terminals have... Read More

1992 Volvo 460 Reviews

Most Bang For Buck If You Want A Car From Price Between 500-1000€. By Juha

Lovely feeling of acceleration when the turbocharger charges from low (1750->) revs. Acceleration from 80kmh to 120kmh is excellent for its displacement. in other words the car has good low rpm torque... Read More

Good, Cheap To Buy And Compared To It's Price It Has Good Performance. By Juha

I like its performance, high mileage, driveability, looks, equipment, seats, low revs on highway. etc. What I dislike in it is that the quality is not comparable to other Volvos. I don't like its chas... Read More

1991 Volvo 460 Reviews

French Volvo. By Danger-Dan

Cheap, crappy car. Not a Volvo in it's means but was reliable the time I had to drive it. Worked fine and ran fine. Quite good fuel economy for such a old car with 1.7l engine. On the inside everythi... Read More

Most Surprising Car I Have Owned... By John

This car was a Volvo 460 Turbo, with a 1.7 litre petrol engine. 0-60 in around 7 seconds and top end of (in excess of) 135MPH. Very solid with handling and taught me alot about aggresive driving. It a... Read More

1990 Volvo 460 Reviews

An Underestimated One By Philippe

I should have gone for the turbocharged version, if budget had only permitted. But the 460 GLE I owned was real fun to drive around, and easy to handle. Read More

Have you driven a 1995 Volvo 460?