1992 Saturn S-Series User Reviews

Have you driven a 1992 Saturn S-Series?  
Rank This Car

User Reviews

Displaying 11 - 19 of 19 1992 Saturn S-Series reviews.

1992 Saturn S-Series 4 Dr SL2 Sedan Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
85

Saturn Sl2 Sedan — Preformance wise the car has a solid feel at the wheel. It accelerates quickly, brakes were good, but were replaced with new ones. Handling was all there where you point the wheel the car went. It needed a lot of repairs, but that comes with older cars. Never had any other problems. The car for its year was a a good look for it, interior was clean and comfy. Amazing on gas mainance was easy could do it your self. The car was fun to drive and you could take it any where. For a family sedan, the car was great.

Pros: Easy first car, taught a lot about maintence

Cons: Age caught up to it.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1992 Saturn S-Series 4 Dr SL1 Sedan Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
25

Saturns — i like my little saturn, its so sexy! and kernic looks real manly driving it too. the performance is great for such an old car, the body is in excellent condition and they said it was one of the best etests they had ever seen when we put it on the road. hurray for saturns!

Pros: great on gas, good condition, good performance

Cons: too small for a family of five

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1992 Saturn S-Series 4 Dr SL2 Sedan Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
45

Saturn Sl-2 — love the gas mileage, love the get up and go of the car, but I hate that its sat for two years and there are a few problems associated with that. I like the new stereo that I put in it, I've put alot into this car and I know that it will treat me good for a long time to come.

Pros: Reliability and gas mileage

Cons: the fact that mine sat for two years.

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Saturn S-Series 2 Dr SC Coupe Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
35

Thumbs Up For The Plastic Car — Well this car was not to bad to me for awhile. was pretty quick had a dohc motor that was pretty tourqey and sounded amazing with the magna flow muffler that i had on it. But it was made of plastic verything wanted to rattle off of it in the inside but it was a fun car.

Pros: It was pretty darn fast for a saturn.

Cons: there made of plastic and they dont last that long

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1992 Saturn S-Series Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
35

For $400. It's Great. — The body needs a paint job, the clear coat is peeling, but other than that the car is very dependable.

Pros: 28 mpg. And thats needing a tune up.

Cons: Slight hesitation accelerating.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1992 Saturn S-Series 4 Dr SL2 Sedan Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
35

Tupperware Car — The body panels are made from plastic, which is very durable. No need to worry about dents or dings, the fenders keep their shape surprisingly well. With 200,000+ miles, it burns a little oil, but I have never had a problem with it mechanicaly.

Pros: Decent gas mileage
Hit shopping carts with no fear of damage

Cons: Hedliner fell down
Sunroof leaks/ doesn't work
Underpowered

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Saturn S-Series 4 Dr SL2 Sedan Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
35

The Silver Bullet — Miss my little car

Pros: Super Fast, Drove through anything

Cons: Being smoked by a 5 tonne, while parked

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1992 Saturn S-Series 4 Dr SL2 Sedan Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
75

Great Car For A First Car — The car was small and had a small gas tank. Easy to chuck around corners, hard to drift. Exterior had lots of dents, while the interior was very ugly.

Pros: Great gas milage

Cons: No power

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1992 Saturn S-Series 4 Dr SL Sedan Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
25

Reliable Until 164,000 Miles........at Least In My Case — The car is very compact and does not require much gas. It has a large trunk and plenty of leg room. Overall, it is a great little car!

Owner for 4 years, 5 months

Miles Driven per Year:20,000

Pros: Compact, low gas use, sleek looking

Cons: Problems with oil usage, major engine problems after 164,000 miles

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Displaying 11 - 19 of 19 1992 Saturn S-Series reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2002 Saturn S-Series Reviews

Although The Car Has Some Issues, It Has More Positives Than Negatives. By NRL

Why you chose your car? I purchased my car because at the time my son was 10 years old. This made it a great car for me because the third door to the rear bench seat does not open unless the driver’... Read More

A Car To Have Faith In By otakugirl

Car is sleek on the outside and comfortable inside, even if it is a bit cramped. Great for cruising in town and on highway, but lacks a fast take off. I was hoping for more room in the trunk as we ten... Read More

2001 Saturn S-Series Reviews

Gas Saver With A 3rd Door! By Paul

Great car for the most part, good build quality but they used some cheaper parts to build it with. Its kinda rough on the transmission shifts sometimes but pretty smooth for an entry level car etc. Bo... Read More

Great Little Car By bamendt

goes through a lot of oil (not a leak), can kick when going from drive to reverse (have heard others with this issue with the same model, handling is not that great... overall i am very please with th... Read More

2000 Saturn S-Series Reviews

Great Gas Mileage Car!!! By topsecretauto

This Car gets great gas mileage!!!! There's not a whole lot of room for tall people. But with that said, this really is a great car!! The gas mileage alone makes up for the lack of room in the back fo... Read More

Very Good Car Everyone Should Have One On The Track By patbrown

good on the track. needs a littel more speed. only running 5500 rpm's on the straight a way. great quailty car, doors are hard to destroy. lots of saturns on the track. good moters and easy to get par... Read More

1999 Saturn S-Series Reviews

Great And Cheap By Lana

Had my saturn S for 7 yrs, 4th owner, paid 2000. replaced tranny and clutch, and did about 1500 bucks worth of repairs including that in those 7yrs. Since I bought it, horn doesn't work, and no one ca... Read More

I Dont Like Any Car That Isnt Reliable By billybobisbillybob

its hard to write a 40 word survey about a unrelaiable car but I might be able to make it to forty words if I keep writing about this unreliable car that's been sitting in my drive for a month. wait h... Read More

1998 Saturn S-Series Reviews

Wonder Full Car.... By Teresa

This is a great car for communing. It handles well and cruses like a jewel. Trunk space is ample and it is very reliable. This car is such an under-appreciated and over looked car. It has been very i... Read More

Great Car! By microWaves

I like everything about the car in general, nothing wrong with it um just a few little things need to be replaced. honestly I would recommend this car for a first timer, great for college and people w... Read More

Cars compared to 1992 Saturn S-SeriesPeople researching a 1992 Saturn S-Series contacted a dealer about

S-Series

Looking for a Used S-Series in your area?

CarGurus has 988 nationwide S-Series listings starting at $1,850.

ZIP:
Have you driven a 1992 Saturn S-Series?  
Rank Your Car →