1982 Volkswagen Polo User Reviews

Have you driven a 1982 Volkswagen Polo?

Rank This Car

Displaying all 1982 Volkswagen Polo reviews reviews.

1982 Volkswagen PoloReview

Alastair writes:

Appearance:

Performance:

Quality:

Overall:

Don't Even Go There — Performance - Acceleration was average, braking was very poor, handling was loose. Build Quality - Solid everywhere for a 26 year old car, plenty of squeaks and rattles Apperance - Rubbish 80's styling, got a few stares! Cost of ownership - 35 mpg was average, parts are cheap and easy to fit Fun factor - funny how terrible it was!

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: Cheapest thing with wheels - bought for £150

Cons: It's obvious it only cost £150

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Looking for a Used Polo in your area?

CarGurus has thousands of nationwide listings and the tools to find you a great deal.

1982 Volkswagen PoloReview

James writes:

Appearance:

Performance:

Quality:

Overall:

First Car Fun — My first car. the poor thing. it was abused and tortured. But it too loads of stick that it was neevr designed to do. Boot space was ample and there was nothing really i could complain about. I'd buy another tomorrow. best car ever really. poor old girl.

Pros: Cheap and fun

Cons: none

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Displaying all 1982 Volkswagen Polo reviews reviews.

2008 Volkswagen Polo Reviews

Review By Guru9L7QPF

The car is good value and is easy maintaining Read More

Polo 1.6 By Gurbinder

Overall performance of the car is great, it looks nice, handles very good , build quality is excellent, Interiors are not bad, milage is bit on lower side and maintenance cost is bit on higher side ... Read More

Read all 8 2008 Volkswagen Polo reviews

1995 Volkswagen Polo Reviews

Want Something Eco And Cheap Reliability Look No Further Nothing In Its Class Matches It. By Andy

This was a 3 year old car when I brought it on 27,000 miles, it wasnt quick but it was for a little 1.3L it was quite involving as it had no power steering u felt the road which gave it a fun sporty f... Read More

G40 By Karim

This car was just brilliant. It drove and handled very well. It was very stable and solid. It wasn't very fast but it looked very sporty. The interior wasn't stylish. But it was definitely very fun to... Read More

Read all 6 1995 Volkswagen Polo reviews

1994 Volkswagen Polo Reviews

Cheap Runabout By Max

1994 Volkswagen Polo CL 1.05 Power - Small engine with very little torque, meaning with passengers, speed decreases and engine demand increases. Looks/Style - Boxy, the headlights were alright. Maint... Read More

Cant Buy Anything That Well Build And Cheap To Run For The Money By Andy

A really mint little car on 65,000 miles for £300 so what more can I say, cheap reliable car for no real money so with that in mind it was a great little car for the short time I owned it. Read More

Read all 5 1994 Volkswagen Polo reviews

1993 Volkswagen Polo Reviews

Polo Gt Coupe By Chris

There's is nothing that I can fault on this car, only that I cant drive it enough!! Can get well over 300 miles to a tank of fuel which is about Â£50 The breaks can be a little bit unresponsive at... Read More

1.3 Metalic Satin Silver Polo Genesis By Katie

was my first car so will always have a soft spot for this hatch. was really nippy and left quite a few fiesta chavs gobsmacked at traffic lights! which was always fun! was the cleanest model i've ever... Read More

Read all 4 1993 Volkswagen Polo reviews

1992 Volkswagen Polo Reviews

Can Put A Vr6 Engine In There Nicely By James

I loved everything about it, Its retro look, its power for what it had, its super lightweight and the fact that anywhere i went i was the only one, I loved my custom Zender sideskirts and it was cheap... Read More

Wolf In Sheeps Clothing By Daniel

0-60 in about 4 seconds top speed of 145 mpph out accelerates most things, especially lotus elise ok handling good breaks big supercharger stealthy as fook, wouldnt look much and sooooo much fun pr... Read More

Read all 3 1992 Volkswagen Polo reviews