Have you driven a 1982 Volkswagen Polo?  
Rank This Car

User Reviews

Displaying all 2 1982 Volkswagen Polo reviews.

1982 Volkswagen PoloReview
Alastair writes:

Don't Even Go There — Performance - Acceleration was average, braking was very poor, handling was loose. Build Quality - Solid everywhere for a 26 year old car, plenty of squeaks and rattles Apperance - Rubbish 80's styling, got a few stares! Cost of ownership - 35 mpg was average, parts are cheap and easy to fit Fun factor - funny how terrible it was!

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: Cheapest thing with wheels - bought for £150

Cons: It's obvious it only cost £150

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Looking for a Used Polo in your area?

CarGurus has thousands of nationwide listings and the tools to find you a great deal.

1982 Volkswagen PoloReview
James writes:

First Car Fun — My first car. the poor thing. it was abused and tortured. But it too loads of stick that it was neevr designed to do. Boot space was ample and there was nothing really i could complain about. I'd buy another tomorrow. best car ever really. poor old girl.

Pros: Cheap and fun

Cons: none

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Displaying all 2 1982 Volkswagen Polo reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2008 Volkswagen Polo Reviews

Polo 1.6 By Gurbinder

Overall performance of the car is great, it looks nice, handles very good , build quality is excellent, Interiors are not bad, milage is bit on lower side and maintenance cost is bit on higher side ... Read More

Overall Good Car By Paul

No electric windows and i realy wish the car could have a bit more power. The power lack is only low range where you cruise and it has no power to overtake. the car has all the extras but no electri... Read More

2007 Volkswagen Polo Reviews

Good Safe Little Car, Reliable, Just Wish It Was A Bit More Powerful By Martyn

Brakes are good, acceleration not so much. Decent build, usual german car standard with a bit more plastic as it's small. Looks alright, definately not ugly, and interior is clean and well thought o... Read More

Awesome Polo By Rudi

Good car all around. What it lacks in performance it sure makes up in character. Reliable and also economical. Value for money you wont get better. Services are not expensive and the dealerships are u... Read More

2006 Volkswagen Polo Reviews

Vw Build Quality And Great Performance By Shaun

Fantastic mixture of performance and fuel efficiency. The power is incredible, driving up a hill at 130kph in 6th gear and still got plenty torque. Simple car with all features needed, Power Sterring,... Read More

Awsome Car By Jacques

Best in its class, good performance for a 1.6, fast acceleration, great braking, outstanding handling. Very strong build, no squeks or ratteling. Interior is a little plain, but still nice. Exterior i... Read More

2005 Volkswagen Polo Reviews

Vw You Can't Go Wrong By Frans En

•Performance - acceleration is very good, braking is excelent, handling is verygood •Build Quality - is excelent no squeaks or rattles for a car with almost 200000km on the odo •Appearance - both int... Read More

Reliability By Reandré

Performes well for a 1.6i. The build quality is acceptable. The styling is not as pretty as the hatchback, but it is practical. It is very light on fuel, I had an average consumption of 13.5 kilometer... Read More

2004 Volkswagen Polo Reviews

U Should'v Heared It. . . By Nelson

Polo Classic 1.6!! I used to call it the White Bullet because of it's exclusive preformances, this car made wonders, it may sound scary but true - the Golf 5 GTI, Beemer 330i as well as the Merc Komp... Read More

Very Nice Car! By Cp

Awsome student car, great fuel consumption yet the performance is still respectable! When I bought the car, I had to change the clutch, cam belt, control arm bushes and had to service it, because the ... Read More

Cars compared to 1982 Volkswagen Polo

Have you driven a 1982 Volkswagen Polo?  
Rank Your Car →