Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack Widebody RWD vs Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Coupe RWD

The Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Coupe RWD showcases its engineering prowess with a Supercharged 6.2-liter V8 delivering a robust 650 hp and 650 lb-ft of torque. This sheer power situates it as a powerhouse among muscle cars. In contrast, the Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack Widebody RWD offers a compelling 485hp from its 392 Hemi V-8, with a torque output of 475 lb-ft. While its output is somewhat moderate compared to the ZL1, the Scat Pack Widebody upholds a strong performance ethos within its range. Weight considerations reveal that the Camaro ZL1 has a curb weight ranging from 3,907 to 4,120 pounds, whereas the Challenger R/T Scat Pack Widebody tilts the scales at 4,298 pounds, reflecting its bulkier stance.

Beneath the hood of the Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Coupe RWD lies a Supercharged 6.2-liter V8 engine. Matched with either a six-speed manual or a 10-speed automatic transmission, this robust setup propels the ZL1 from 0 to 60 mph in just 3.5 seconds, adding substantial clout to its racing credentials. Comparable yet distinct is the Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack Widebody RWD, which houses a 485hp 6.4-liter 392 Hemi V-8 engine. This powertrain, coupled with a standard six-speed manual transmission and rear-wheel drive, achieves a spirited 0-60 mph time of approximately 4.2 seconds. Despite the difference in acceleration prowess, both models exemplify classic American muscle with their dedicated rear-wheel drive layouts.

The Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Coupe RWD brings a sporty silhouette with dimensions measuring 190.2 inches in length and a wheelbase of 110.7 inches. This contrasts with the Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack Widebody RWD, which presents a markedly longer body at 197.9 inches, supported by a 116.0-inch wheelbase. Width-wise, the Camaro sits at 75 inches, whereas the Challenger extends to 78.3 inches. Height measurements further differentiate the two with the Camaro ZL1 standing at 52.9 inches compared to the Challenger's taller 57.7 inches. These dimensional differences shape their respective road presence and design ethos.