Have you driven a 2003 Volvo S60?  

User Reviews

Displaying 1 - 10 of 2003 Volvo S60 10 reviews.

2003 Volvo S60 2.4T TurboReview
flying2013 writes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

Love It — I would buy another s60 but for the Maine winters I am looking for a Volvo xc60 awd for I would like to be a little higher and we also have two dogs so I like the cargo area for them

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: all around a great car the awd is super in snow

Cons: n/a

5 of 6 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Volvo S60 2.4T TurboReview
Jared writes:
Brakes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Interior Noise:
Long Trips:
Maintenance Cost:
Parking:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Snow/Ice:
Looks/Style:
Visibility:
Overall:

2003 Volvo S60 2.4t —

This car is a Volvo, so it definitely has the safety thing going for it. I would say that the best thing about this car is its passing ability. The turbo really kicks into action around 45mph. The car will leap up to 85mph in the blink of an eye which is very useful when you need to get around that old lady on a backroad. You have to run 93 octane which can be expensive, but it's not bad on the mileage ( I average 23mpg ). The back seat does not have an abundance of space, but the seats are comfortable enough that you don't mind all that much. The cargo space in the trunk is sufficient and it even has a grocery organizer that flips up from the floor. I am not crazy about the looks personally, but it is better than plenty of cars on the road. I have had issues with the AC, suspension wearing out prematurely, and some minor engine issues. There are trim strips that run the length of drip rails and down both the front and rear windscreens that are poorly made. I have replaced them twice because they crack and chip away. the worst thing about this car is its turning radius. I can pull a Uy in less space in my 97 F-150 than I can this car. I frequently have to adjust when pulling into parking spots and the tires, which are not fractory size rub in the wheel wells when I make a sharp turn.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: This car is fun in a straight line, but the turning radius could use some help. I got this car when I needed a reliable ride, and it has been reliable, but I would not buy another.

Cons: Parking is the worst thing about driving it.

7 of 7 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Volvo S60 T5 TurboReview
Ruuti writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Sedan With A Turbo — This car has great quality and you rarely have to take it in to the shop. The turbo makes the car seem so extremely fast for a reasonable price. This car is extremely fun to drive, especially with the turbo

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: Turbo Speed Fun

Cons: Just a standard sedan, WITH A TURBO!!!! And that's a good thing by the way.

2 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Volvo S60Review
Martin writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Good Looks — Volvo s60 5-cyl 170hp 1993 Strong engine, yet no turbo and therefore a bit weak when pushed. Extremly good comfort, especially due to the fine chairs. Smooth and elegant design. Fun to drive if you like comfort more then sport. No repairs, only normal service. Light brown interior, fully equiped. 0,75L/mil - 1,1L/mil (city)

Primary Use: Family transportation

Pros: Comfort, design, safety

Cons: Tight rearseat

3 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Volvo S60 T5 TurboReview
Milan197 writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Great Car — Performance - great, best acceleration, speed, much faster than many other stronger cars Build Quality - one of the best in class Appearance - very good Cost of Ownership - much economic than a lot of other smaller cars, good consumption Fun Factor - of course

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: Acceleration, speed, economy, build quality, confort...

Cons: lack of 4x4, torque steer with tc off

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Volvo S60Review
Alex writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Good Car — It is a nice car, has good pick up. its more of a luxury car than a performance car, and it handles like it. The turning radius could be tighter, and more acceleration would be nice, once it get going, it goes great.

Primary Use: Family transportation

Pros: Handles well

Cons: none

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Volvo S60 T5 TurboReview
Stu writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

My Rod! — Best car i ever had, very quick and handled like it was on rails, kickin dolby surround sound 13 speaker stereo. Never broke down an fully loaded with every extra. Wolf in sheeps clothing with performance air filter and a bailey dump valve.

Pros: Wolf in sheeps clothing

Cons: Are'nt any.

2 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Volvo S60Review
Daniel writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Meeeep — Fast acc but not too high top speed. Very good brakes, handling is also good, the car behaves very stable. Build quality is very good. Gearbox is not as new at 20kkm. It's a fun car, the diesel engine really has a lot of power for quick overtaking.

Pros: meep

Cons: meeep

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Volvo S60 2.5T Turbo AWDReview
Terje writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Great Overall! — Love the AWD. Turbo motor is strong. Comfortable on the highway and nimble on twisty roads.

Pros: Turbo motor. AWD. Fully loaded.

Cons: Fairly small car inside.

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2003 Volvo S60 2.4T TurboReview
Edwin writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

... — Love the car but the next car i get is gonna b a vdub.Most probably the new GLI

Pros: Fast. Never had major problems. Not alot of people have um

Cons: Expensive as hell to get parts.Aftermarket parts on this car DO NOT WORK

2 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying 1 - 10 of 2003 Volvo S60 10 reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2022 Volvo S60 Reviews

Review By Guru9SCHKD

Thank you very happy with my new volvo Read More

2020 Volvo S60 Reviews

Review By GuruN5ZBC

Very good acceleration with the T-6 package, and handles well. Smooth ride, and quiet cabin. Interior nicely laid out. Plenty of leg room for tall drivers. Read More

Review By GuruHTHQG

My 2020 volvo S60 is exceptional and I love it, I have no complaints im very happy with it. Read More

2019 Volvo S60 Reviews

Review By Rviles300

Test drive a 2019 S60. If I were a shorter person I think it would be a good car. Couldn’t purchase as the cabin was just too small Read More

Review By Stamo

Great interior and nice handling, fun to drive. Comfortable seats Read More

2018 Volvo S60 Reviews

Review By Guru912CFK

Lots of miles and dent in drivers door detract from an otherwise nice 1 owner car with new tires. Read More

Review By Glenn

Fantastic car! I work for Enterprise car rental I drive all sorts of cars.. this is by far the most comfortable safest well handling machine on the road Read More

2017 Volvo S60 Reviews

Review By Jmrl17

Luxury meets sporty. Handles great. Would purchase again Read More

Review By Guru9PQCQF

way over priced with Hight miles. its better to just go to the auction Read More

S60

Looking for a Used S60 in your area?

CarGurus has 2,443 nationwide S60 listings starting at $2,995.

ZIP:
Have you driven a 2003 Volvo S60?