Have you driven a 2002 Land Rover Range Rover?  

User Reviews

View reviews where users commented on categories.

Clear selections

Displaying all 2002 Land Rover Range Rover reviews reviews.

2002 Land Rover Range Rover Review
range1rover2 says:
This car is fantastic i have the big 4.4 v8 petrol which produces 360bhp and is very pleasuring and 0-60 in 6.5 secs. This car is the real deal as if you try to punch the car you would probably break your hand as the car is so strong and heavy that is the point its so strong. I have had a few suspension problems but not so much of a big problem as it was the compressor that needed replacing and i had payed £150.00 . when you sit in this big boy you feel so massive and you feel you are the king of the world when you drive one! when i put my foot on the gas it will just fly. It might be 13 years old but i still get so many good looks. The seats are so comfortable i could just fall asleep for years! For 3.5 tonnes you get a lot of car and when i say a lot i mean so much! The only one downfall would have to be the fuel economy as mine will get 14.6mpg and but no real damage caused, what can you say its really heavy so that says it all, but this is the best car i own and the best i have drove, so if you havnt got one of these you better get one because you will be the happiest person in the world:) I LOVE THIS CAR!!! :)
vs2016 Land Rover Range Rover
2002 Land Rover Range Rover winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
Looks/Style Ranked 2016 Land Rover Range Rover better.
"The car looks more style because of the new lights."
Value Ranked 2016 Land Rover Range Rover worse.
"Now lets get this straight im a rich bugger and i brought the range rover brand new the l322 in 2002 for £70,000 and since then i have loved it all my life no matter what other car i brought i just love it! The sat nav is way easier to use and the voice control and other things. If i be honest i thing the engine is more of a real deal and feels more natural!"
7 of 9 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE 4WDReview
GQHOOD writes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

Luxurious,excellent, Capable, Great Classic Modern Design Suv — It has pretty good Overall acceleration, if you want that extra power just switch to sport mode & smash the pedal. Once the car is moving it quickly accelerates. Braking is surprisingly great for a large SUV. I manage to get 17 MPG highway driving at 70 MPH and between 13-15 city driving, not bad at all for this full time 4x4 gas guzzler! Gets better mileage than a Lincoln Navigator. I've owned this Range Rover for a few months and it hasn't given me any problems. The Rover has been serviced at the dealership for the past 11 years by the previous owner. These Rovers need to be looked after constantly to make sure nothing breaks or it will cost a hefty price to fix.

Primary Use: Family transportation

Pros: Stylish, luxurious, roomy, extremely capable. No matter where you're at, this Classic P38 Range Rover turns heads. Maintained this beauty & it'll last you a lifetime.

Cons: Gas guzzler.

5 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE 4WDReview
Mike writes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

Classy, Elegant, Uniquely Stylish And Handsomely Rugged — I love the unique color and look of this Range Rover. It is loaded with all of Land Rover's options for 2002 including NAV, multiplay CD, Airbag shocks for automatic leveling, stainless steel exhaust and specially stitched interior with just the right amount of wood trim to make it feel warm and comfy. Since I don't put many miles on my cars, it should hold it's value well and gas prices/fuel economy don't really affect me much. The usual British gremlins are sure to make themselves known but since I have worked through most of them with my '01 it shouldn't be a problem to keep up with them

Primary Use: Family transportation

Pros: A beutiful, elegant yet rugged vehicle. Only 100 made.

Cons: Gas mileage suffers due to AWD SUV. Maintainence and repairs can be costly.

6 of 6 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE 4WDReview
RRlover writes:
Accessories:
Battery Life:
Brakes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Daily Commute:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Interior Noise:
Interior Space:
Long Trips:
Maintenance Cost:
Off-Road:
Parking:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Ride Comfort:
Safety:
Looks/Style:
Visibility:
Warranty:
Weight:
Overall:

Uk At Its Finest Hour — I wish the fuel economy was better especially since other suvs have been able to make engines with better fuel milage. Over all I believe that the 2002 P38 was the last of the RR that are flawless in looks and electrical problems that the ones before it and after it have come to experience. This one/year was the flagship!

Primary Use: Family transportation

Pros: Reliable, comfortable, and looks are timeless.

Cons: Fuel economy and the cargo area could have been larger, but it would not allow me to climb mountains due to the incline degree needed for off road expeditions.

6 of 6 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE 4WDReview
Dan writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Range Rovers Break Alot — It breaks alot but looks fantastic and gives a sense of occasion each time you get in it, is horrendously uneconomical, costs a fortune to service and even more when it breaks down, which it does really rather alot! The dog likes it though and I can look down on all the poor people!

Pros: image

Cons: everything else

2 of 6 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE 4WDReview
Mohammad364 writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Terrible In Every Aspect — I have drove alot of cars and this is by far one of the worst cars I have ever driven, the onboard computer beeps and complains on almost anything, it was my first try for Range Rover and it was by far the worst impression I was able to get from it.

Pros: Maybe it's a little spacious....

Cons: - Complains alot
- Very lazy torque
- Feels very loose
- Smells funny

3 of 4 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2002 Land Rover Range RoverReview
Smuj writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

44i Java Black Vogue With Oxford Tan Leather — All round crazy looking ride, 20" Supercharged alloys, Supercharged extras all around.

Pros: Looks amazing, comands respect on the road.

Cons: Juicy, a bit of a pain to park, costly to maintain.

0 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE 4WD Review
rweston777 says:
Great ride but lacks the stye and sporty feeling.
vs2002 BMW X5 4.6is AWD
2002 Land Rover Range Rover 4.6 HSE 4WD winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
Family Car Ranked 2002 BMW X5 4.6is AWD better.
"Safest car ever made!"
Would Buy Ranked 2002 BMW X5 4.6is AWD better.
"Dependability is the cornerstone. Style is unmatched."
2 of 4 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying all 2002 Land Rover Range Rover reviews reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2019 Land Rover Range Rover Reviews

Review By JRSchenker

5th Range Rover- love these cars. Fit and finish is unmatched in the industry… BMWs, Mercedes, Maserati, Audi suvs… none hold a candle to the quality Read More

Review By krogers136

Everything about this car is awesome! Great ride and interior Read More

2018 Land Rover Range Rover Reviews

Review By Guru9TDNCH

Love them all luxury finest - I did not buy this vehicle but know them very well! Read More

Review By Seifa1

Great vehicle with updated features that will turn any rider into great frenzy! All around this ride is for a class type of individuals that love good time when on wheel.. Read More

2017 Land Rover Range Rover Reviews

Review By Guru9YCLDP

Great truck enjoy riding good thanks carGurus see you one day again Read More

Review By Annemarie

Low mileage, clean car . Drives easily, handles well on the road Read More

2016 Land Rover Range Rover Reviews

Review By Guru99RGB5

The features are ok. But the car was over valued . The asking price way high , and yet the car was worth $49000. But the asking price is $61 000 Read More

Review By manar

Lexury Car manufacturers should take notes when it comes to range rover its the best out there for what you get Read More

2015 Land Rover Range Rover Reviews

Review By Jonathan

Too expensive for its rivals , decided to go with a 2013 QX-56. This time with low miles loaded for half the price with more room , great off road performance and higher towing ability. 0-60. IN 6.3.... Read More

Review By GuruC7Y4M

When going to see the Land Rover they change the price 10,000 over the original price Read More

Range Rover

Looking for a Used Range Rover in your area?

CarGurus has 3,996 nationwide Range Rover listings starting at $5,999.

ZIP:
Have you driven a 2002 Land Rover Range Rover?