Have you driven a 2001 Volvo S60?  
Rank This Car

User Reviews

Displaying 1 - 10 of 2001 Volvo S60 10 reviews.

2001 Volvo S60 2.4Review
nfredsell writes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

This Year And Model Is A Real Gamble. — We bought this car at 135k less than a year ago, and we've now spent as much on repairs as we did on the purchase, including AAMCO transmission, radiator ($670). brake booster ($657) and spare key ($171). Now facing air bag ($800) and emission (100's) problems. This car seems to be falling apart mechanically. It had a clean CarFax report. We've owned earlier generation Volvos for years and have had an excellent experience. I assumed initial repairs would stabilize the car, but new problems keep surfacing. Maybe this isn't a 200,000 + mile car like the older ones... We aren't even addressing the engine mount problem that makes it handle roughly and noisily, because that doesn't relate to the mechanical integrity.

Primary Use: Family transportation

Pros: Nice looks, leather seats, attractive color, good gas mileage (compared to our Subaru),

Cons: Ceaseless mechanical problems and computer faults, very expensive parts.

16 of 18 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2001 Volvo S60 T5 TurboReview
Emil writes:
Brakes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Long Trips:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Ride Comfort:
Snow/Ice:
Looks/Style:
Weight:
Overall:

Volvo S60 T5 (standard Car With K&n Drop Air Filter) — Acceleration.. too slow for a normal boost (0.8 bar) Braking- excellent Handling - well, its volvo, wat do u expect?? Build quality is fine, except there is squeaking sound below the glove-box, something very common for S60 cars No problem about the appearance, I Like! Gas mileage is ok, for a 247hp car, you would expect the gas consumption like one. But the maintenance is quite costly, every few months there will be something to be repaired or replaced. However, considering the age of the car (11 years), it is widely expected. FUN FACTOR: It depends. For highway, I'll rate the car at 8 out of 10. For A road and B road type, I will say 7 out of 10.

Primary Use: Family transportation

Pros: An excellent family car with highest safety equipment..

Cons: 1. It breakdown quite frequently during first year owns
2. Suspension not that comfortable as expected.
3. Acceleration sucks from still. But once on the move, beware mate!
4. No Xenon light
5. Gearbox sucks BIG TIME

15 of 16 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2001 Volvo S60 2.4T TurboReview
Jerry writes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

Good Car — nice car. Handles well, Have had very little problems with it. The only thing that I do not like is the back seat. It is a little cramppy. This car is enjoyable to drive, has a nice stereo system in it.

Pros: most everything

Cons: back seat

3 of 4 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2001 Volvo S60 T5 TurboReview
Andrew writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Some People Are Ford Freaks, Some People Are Chevy Freaks. Me? I'm A Volvo Freak. — Solid, well designed. Pininfarina Design. Safe, and rides quiet. It's 10 yrs old and it rides like it's on air. A luxury sedan with the bones of a sports car, quick and fun. The seat are by far the most comfortable seats Ive ever seen. STC, WTC, 4 wheel disc, 5cyl Turbo. Tiptronic transmission, sport mode is a total different machine. very fun!

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: Quality, Both in feel and looks.  Solid and well engineered.

Cons: Not for you if you need an off road vehicle - low clearance

4 of 4 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2001 Volvo S60 2.4Review
Asanka writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

A Great And Fun Car To Have — Have a 2.0L Turbo. Great car. Handles really great. Great performance and can easily over cars here in LKA. Has clocked 145,000 kms and still drives like a champ. No troubles. Make sure to regularly do the services. Also check the bushes as they don't last very long

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: Prestige, great performance. safety.

Cons: Ground clearance. bushes don't last long.

6 of 7 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2001 Volvo S60 2.4T TurboReview
Michael writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

2001 Volvo S60 2.4t Lethally Injected Turbo Edition — Performance-factory performance is poor. Installed aftermarket exhaust. Acceleration is much better. Build quality-no problems with factory parts. Appearance- don't like factory appearance. I installed a black mesh grill. Painted wheels black. Blacked out head and tail lights. Cost of ownership- gas mileage is good after exhaust kit. I haven't had too many problems with the car. Fun Factor- stock the car is alright. It's a lot faster with exhaust kit. Very tight feel. Handles great. I'm waiting on a programmer and air box.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: It's a very well built car.

Cons: I would avoid the car if you are going to leave it stock.

6 of 10 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2001 Volvo S60 2.4Review
Stephen writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Volvo S60 — This car has been an awesome car, I treat my cars rather harsh and this car handles all I throw at it! I travel up to 70,000km a year, the breaks are astounding with great handling! The only problem I have had is a bolt came loose on the tappet cover (random) which then covered the top of the motor with engine oi in the process cracking all 5 coils, I replaced said coils with new ones ($120 each) myself and since have had no more problems over the 4 years of ownership and can not wait to buy another! The only over cars I would consider to replace this car would be a S40, S80,Volvo's or a Citroen C6.

Primary Use: Family transportation

Pros: Awesome fuel econamy , Reliable, Great handling ,very responsive and good performance

Cons: To many light bulb Failures  (park bulb and low beam bulbs)

4 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2001 Volvo S60 T5 TurboReview
Malcolm writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Good Value — Tons of air bags; did the european delivery program with it and that was awesome! One of a few cars with a manual transmission that is quick. Very comfortable inside. For a volvo the styling is exception, particularly the seats.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: Safety

Cons: Not as fast or quick as it should be....

4 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2001 Volvo S60 T5 TurboReview
George writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Freaking Amazing — The Performance is staggering. The tiptronic transmittion puts you in control while making quicker shifts than you possible could with a manual. The appearance is exellent. I have the Volvo performance version which has 17" alloy wheels, fully leather interior, performance suspension, and one of the most powerful turbocharged 5 cylinder engines that has ever been put into a car. The traction control is amazing. You can go around any corner at any desirable speed. The sound of the car can not be described by any words. The sound of the turbo and the exhaust is exactly what you would expect from an European performance car.

Pros: engine, sun roof, leather interior, tranny, turbocharger, handling, performance, the 12 speakers it comes with, and everything else imaginable.

Cons: the bumps on the road are extremely painful with the sports suspension.

8 of 10 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2001 Volvo S60 2.4T TurboReview
Ralf writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

My First Volvo — I like the car and think it looks pretty good. But still it's no sportscar. Good torque from the engine and nice comfort. Breakes are good and fuel ecomomi not bad. I can recomend this engine over the T5. Not very fun to drive compared to smaller cars but ok.

Pros: It's pretty good at everything

Cons: Is rather boring though.

6 of 8 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying 1 - 10 of 2001 Volvo S60 10 reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2019 Volvo S60 Reviews

Review By GuruHTHQG

I am a Volvo owner and I love them all. They are nice, reliable and great looking cars. Read More

Review By Thomas

Absolutely love it! I have owned BMWs until now! Read More

2017 Volvo S60 Reviews

Review By GuruGB1P4

Strong design lines. Excellent drive nice suspension and handling Read More

Review By krisamr

Yes great value but needs interior upgrade . Read More

2016 Volvo S60 Reviews

Review By Guru3WM1X

This makes my 3rd Volvo and had a 2009 Model a few years back, so when looking for a replacement vehicle, it was a simple choice based on safety as the leading cause for choosing Volvo. Read More

2015 Volvo S60 Reviews

Review By GuruJ5LF8

Overall I was pleased with the process and car. Read More

Review By GuruNBLT2

It was in better than expected condition. Solid car Read More

2014 Volvo S60 Reviews

Review By Lourdes

This car is wonderful. It runs almost new. It was kept very clean and together. This car is a good value. I am very satisfied. Read More

S60

Looking for a Used S60 in your area?

CarGurus has 6,198 nationwide S60 listings starting at $1,995.

ZIP:
Have you driven a 2001 Volvo S60?  
Rank Your Car →