Lexus RX vs BMW X3
Overview | |
Years produced2004-Present | Years produced1999-Present |
MSRP$50,900 | MSRP$48,600 |
Listings9282 | Listings9705 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews6.7 out of 10 | Expert reviews6.2 out of 10 |
Pros
Cons
| Pros
Cons
|
Reviews SummaryBMW offers the 2026 X3 in two flavors: 30 xDrive and M50. The latter is tuned for performance, but the base X3 30 xDrive is so good that you might be happy trading the M50’s outright speed and sheer capability for significant savings. BMW redesigned this compact luxury crossover in 2025, and the only tweaks for 2026 make the base model look and feel a little more upscale inside. Verdict: For this review, we evaluated the BMW X3 M50. It was terrific, but with a sticker price more than $15,000 higher than the rewarding X3 30 xDrive, it’s hard to justify the extra money. | |
Reviews SummaryThe Lexus RX crossover SUV sticks to its core strengths by delivering an abundance of comfort and luxury while returning impressive fuel economy figures. While it may not be as exciting to drive as its rivals and its styling leaves some puzzled, it's a solid pick for those looking to reduce their carbon footprint. Verdict: The RX comes up short on performance and driver engagement, but should appeal to those who prioritize comfort and refinement. | |
No video found | |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine2.0L 255 hp I4 | Engine2.4L 275 hp I4 |
Drive TrainAWD | Drive TrainFWD |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Horsepower255 hp @ 4700 rpm | Horsepower275 hp @ 6000 rpm |
MPG City27 | MPG City22 |
MPG Highway33 | MPG Highway29 |
Engine | |
Engine Name2.0L 255 hp I4 | Engine Name2.4L 275 hp I4 |
Torque295 lb-ft @ 1600 rpm | Torque317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm |
Horsepower255 hp @ 4700 rpm | Horsepower275 hp @ 6000 rpm |
DrivetrainAWD | DrivetrainFWD |
Fuel Economy | |
MPG City27 | MPG City22 |
MPG Highway33 | MPG Highway29 |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Key Features | |
Navigation SystemStandard | Navigation SystemStandard |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall4 | Front Crash Overall4 |
Side Crash Overall5 | Side Crash Overall5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space31.5 cu ft | Cargo Space29.6 cu ft |
Curb Weight4176 lbs | Curb Weight4155 lbs |
Height65.4 in | Height67.3 in |
Length187.2 in | Length192.5 in |
Width83.9 in | Width75.6 in |
Wheelbase112.8 in | Wheelbase112.2 in |
Maximum Payload1107 lbs | Maximum Payload |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity4001 lbs | Maximum Towing Capacity3494 lbs |
Overview | ||
Years produced | 2004-Present | 1999-Present |
MSRP | $50,900 | $48,600 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | ||
Expert reviews | 6.7 out of 10Read full review | 6.2 out of 10Read full review |
Pros & cons | Pros
Cons
| Pros
Cons
|
Summary | BMW offers the 2026 X3 in two flavors: 30 xDrive and M50. The latter is tuned for performance, but the base X3 30 xDrive is so good that you might be happy trading the M50’s outright speed and sheer capability for significant savings. BMW redesigned this compact luxury crossover in 2025, and the only tweaks for 2026 make the base model look and feel a little more upscale inside. Verdict: For this review, we evaluated the BMW X3 M50. It was terrific, but with a sticker price more than $15,000 higher than the rewarding X3 30 xDrive, it’s hard to justify the extra money. | The Lexus RX crossover SUV sticks to its core strengths by delivering an abundance of comfort and luxury while returning impressive fuel economy figures. While it may not be as exciting to drive as its rivals and its styling leaves some puzzled, it's a solid pick for those looking to reduce their carbon footprint. Verdict: The RX comes up short on performance and driver engagement, but should appeal to those who prioritize comfort and refinement. |
Video | No video found | |
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 2.0L 255 hp I4 | 2.4L 275 hp I4 |
Drive Train | AWD | FWD |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Horsepower | 255 hp @ 4700 rpm | 275 hp @ 6000 rpm |
MPG City | 27 | 22 |
MPG Highway | 33 | 29 |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 2.0L 255 hp I4 | 2.4L 275 hp I4 |
Torque | 295 lb-ft @ 1600 rpm | 317 lb-ft @ 1700 rpm |
Horsepower | 255 hp @ 4700 rpm | 275 hp @ 6000 rpm |
Drivetrain | AWD | FWD |
Fuel Economy | ||
MPG City | 27 | 22 |
MPG Highway | 33 | 29 |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Key Features | ||
Navigation System | Standard | Standard |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 4 | 4 |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | 5 |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 31.5 cu ft | 29.6 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 4176 lbs | 4155 lbs |
Height | 65.4 in | 67.3 in |
Length | 187.2 in | 192.5 in |
Width | 83.9 in | 75.6 in |
Wheelbase | 112.8 in | 112.2 in |
Maximum Payload | 1107 lbs | |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | 4001 lbs | 3494 lbs |
By: CarGurus + AI
At CarGurus, our team of experienced automotive writers remain at the heart of our content operation, conducting hands-on car tests and writing insightful guides that are backed by years of industry experience. To complement this, we are harnessing AI to make our content offering more diverse and more helpful to shoppers than ever. To achieve this, our AI systems are based exclusively on CarGurus content, ratings and data, so that what we produce is both unique to CarGurus, and uniquely helpful to car shoppers.