CarGurus Header

Used 2004 Jaguar XK-Series for SaleNationwide

Filters (3)

Location:

Include delivery listings?

25 vehicles found

Shop with transparent pricing.

Only show listings that include dealer fees
Year:
2005
Make:
Jaguar
Model:
XK-Series
Body type:
Convertible
Doors:
2 doors
Drivetrain:
Rear-Wheel Drive
Engine:
390 hp 4.2L V8
Exterior color:
Silver
Combined gas mileage:
17 MPG
Fuel type:
Gasoline
Interior color:
Gray
Transmission:
Automatic
Mileage:
107,101
Stock #:
D5408
VIN:
SAJDA42B453A42248
Silver 2005 Jaguar XK-Series Convertible Rear-Wheel Drive Automatic
Price drop

-$500

 

2005 Jaguar XK-Series

XKR Convertible RWD

107,101 mi

Northborough, MA
No Rating

$14,890

$14,390

About 2004 Jaguar XK-Series
4.5 Overall rating(4 reviews)
Daniel C says...
May 11, 2015
the has beautiful style and looks great at every angle. runs smooth and has plenty of pickup especially when you put it into sports mode. I wouldn't change anything about this car. my wife calls sports mode Beast mode.. Awesome
Harold W says...
Aug 11, 2022
The car was fantastic it looks like a brand new car out of the showcase the inside is immaculate the outside is immaculate the mileage was so low it was ridiculous and the car dropped out of heaven for me what a remarkable car
Maria L says...
Feb 22, 2022
With regard ro the XK8, the 2003-2006 models have the reliable 4.2 liter engine, Naturally aspirated and super charged. The earlier 4.0 liter engine is known to have timing chain tensioner issues (plastic) and requires an upgrade or you risk the chain snapping and fatal damage to the engine. The 4.2 NA has 300hp but feels more quick than fast. The xKR adds a supercharger for over 400hp. The interior quality is typical historical Jaguar with walnut veneer, wooden steering wheel, leather and nice carpet (not Wilton). Reliability is pretty good for the 4.2 litre cars, but it’s not a Toyota in terms of being trouble free. Rust is a big issue and mine merely had nuisance items go bad prematurely like a wheel bearing. But it has mostly been very reliable. In 2007 the X150 Alumimum cars came out looking quite a bit more modern. Quicker than the earlier steel cars, the x150s nevertheless lack the quality of materials of the xk8. In 2009 the 4.2 litre engine was superseded by a 5.0 litre motor which is quite a bit more powerful with 385 hp NA and eventually over 500 SC horses. Sadly the 5.0 litre cars renewed the Jaguar AJ8 engine’s timing chain tensioners. This was allegedly ironed out by 2013. In my opinion, as an owner and having driven all versions, the 4.2 engine cars are most desirable and have modest running costs. Any pre-2013 5.0 litre or 4.0 litre car should have timing chain tensioner upgrades verified or use it to get a discount. The xk8 has more quality to the interior and comfort. It also looks more like the E-Type if that is important to you. The X150 in my opinion is a bit better looking, quicker and feels more eager with less weight. Both in 4.2 are good cars. It’s your call.
chas c says...
Feb 20, 2014
Love the shape, prefer the Coupe though. This is my 8th or 9th XK. Preference is the XKR but could not find many in the US that were the 'old' shape Drives great Never lacks power Would buy this model again and again but at some point am going to have to go to the new shape.

 

Year:
2003
Make:
Jaguar
Model:
XK-Series
Body type:
Convertible
Doors:
2 doors
Drivetrain:
Rear-Wheel Drive
Engine:
390 hp 4.2L V8
Exterior color:
Carnival Red
Combined gas mileage:
17 MPG
Fuel type:
Gasoline
Interior color:
Brown (Heritage Tan)
Transmission:
Automatic
Mileage:
64,768
Stock #:
21894
VIN:
SAJDA42BX33A31204
Vehicle photo unavailable

Preparing for a close up...

Photos coming soon

 

2003 Jaguar XK-Series

XKR Convertible RWD

64,768 mi

Downers Grove, IL
No Rating

$15,412

4.5 Overall rating

(4 reviews)

Filter by rating


Daniel C

5.0

Reviewed a 2004 Jaguar XK8 Convertible RWD on May 11, 2015

the has beautiful style and looks great at every angle. runs smooth and has plenty of pickup especially when you put it into sports mode. I wouldn't change anything about this car. my wife calls sports mode Beast mode.. Awesome

Is this review helpful?
Harold W

5.0

Reviewed a 2004 Jaguar XK-Series on Aug 11, 2022

The car was fantastic it looks like a brand new car out of the showcase the inside is immaculate the outside is immaculate the mileage was so low it was ridiculous and the car dropped out of heaven for me what a remarkable car

Is this review helpful?
Maria L

4.0

Reviewed a 2004 Jaguar XK-Series on Feb 22, 2022

With regard ro the XK8, the 2003-2006 models have the reliable 4.2 liter engine, Naturally aspirated and super charged. The earlier 4.0 liter engine is known to have timing chain tensioner issues (plastic) and requires an upgrade or you risk the chain snapping and fatal damage to the engine. The 4.2 NA has 300hp but feels more quick than fast. The xKR adds a supercharger for over 400hp. The interior quality is typical historical Jaguar with walnut veneer, wooden steering wheel, leather and nice carpet (not Wilton). Reliability is pretty good for the 4.2 litre cars, but it’s not a Toyota in terms of being trouble free. Rust is a big issue and mine merely had nuisance items go bad prematurely like a wheel bearing. But it has mostly been very reliable. In 2007 the X150 Alumimum cars came out looking quite a bit more modern. Quicker than the earlier steel cars, the x150s nevertheless lack the quality of materials of the xk8. In 2009 the 4.2 litre engine was superseded by a 5.0 litre motor which is quite a bit more powerful with 385 hp NA and eventually over 500 SC horses. Sadly the 5.0 litre cars renewed the Jaguar AJ8 engine’s timing chain tensioners. This was allegedly ironed out by 2013. In my opinion, as an owner and having driven all versions, the 4.2 engine cars are most desirable and have modest running costs. Any pre-2013 5.0 litre or 4.0 litre car should have timing chain tensioner upgrades verified or use it to get a discount. The xk8 has more quality to the interior and comfort. It also looks more like the E-Type if that is important to you. The X150 in my opinion is a bit better looking, quicker and feels more eager with less weight. Both in 4.2 are good cars. It’s your call.

Is this review helpful?
chas c

5.0

Reviewed a 2004 Jaguar XK8 Convertible RWD on Feb 20, 2014

Love the shape, prefer the Coupe though. This is my 8th or 9th XK. Preference is the XKR but could not find many in the US that were the 'old' shape Drives great Never lacks power Would buy this model again and again but at some point am going to have to go to the new shape.

Is this review helpful?

A better way to discover your best deal

Let us help you find a car you’ll love.

CarGurus Footer