Have you driven a 1992 Ford Taurus?  

User Reviews

Displaying 1 - 10 of 1992 Ford Taurus 10 reviews.

1992 Ford Taurus SHOReview
bgf18 writes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

Great Engine, Terrible Everything Else... — As a teen in the 90's, I fell in love with sports sedans (I don't know why). Saw the SHO brand-new as a kid and had to get one as soon as I finished college. I found a red, five-speed manual with about 70K on the odometer. I put another 72K on it and sold it to help defray the cost of an engagement ring. This car was fun. Great, great engine. Nice intake sounds, wonderful engine to look at. ***More to follow***

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: Yamaha-built DOHC 24V V-6. Just beautiful to look at and wring out.

Cons: Everything supplied by Ford, which was everything but the engine.

4 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Ford Taurus GLReview
Steve writes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Snow/Ice:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

Good Runner! — its ok, needs piant, head liner, head lights! got the car with 38k miles now its got 112k and a trip from texas under its belt! i love this car cuz its quick and its ugly! i cant wait to get a new truck tho!!

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: need new car

Cons: paint

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Ford Taurus SHOReview
Eric writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Different,and Cool — -stock performance was good,but the car really took to performance mods well,let that 3.0L breathe better really wakes it up! -the stock brakes leave alot to be desired,but the '96 SHO brake upgrade made a huge difference -it does rattle,but then again it is 18 years old -interior styling is a little dated in my opinion,so an upgrade is sorely needed,exterior styling is better ,and only differs slightly than the regular taurus,but helps in the whole sleeper vibe that the car eminates -not very costly to own one of these,if the car was taken care of,and you are able to handle the bulk of the repairs your self,or have a mechanic as a good friend(discount) -The car is loads of fun to drive...I love shocking people in "better" cars,and I also love it when people say "what kind of car is that",and "oh I didnt know that they made a stick shift taurus"

Primary Use: Family transportation

Pros: fast,and roomy,makes all the right noises

Cons: motor parts can be expensive

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Ford Taurus SHOReview
Richard writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Bad Ass And A Sleeper — this car is very quick with a beefed up 3.2L v6. a little sluggish in handling but it will make up for it in the straight away. the car came stock with a premium 7 speaker sound system that sounded amazing. leather interior and power everything including heated seats and sun roof. climate control and this car was very fun to drive

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: waxes the little hondas out there in style

Cons: i dont know

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1992 Ford Taurus LReview
Samuel Decimus writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Have Fun In It. These Days It's Likely To Be A Starter Car For A Punk Teen Like Myself — rides like a 35 year old mule. everything needs replacing except the door handles. usta be pretty slick, then 1994 ended. still gets 17+ mpg. constantly needs new brake lines and headlights. All in all, i've had fun in this car. it's a bit junky so i don't mind taking it for a spin in a cornfield...

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: cheap, cheap, cheap, thousands of em, parts everywhere.

Cons: POS

1 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Ford Taurus GLReview
Natalli writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Awesome Tank! — It was a great car, the seats were comfortable. LOL. The car only had 85MPH on the speedometer so when it comes to being fast (it's not). There were some transmission problems but maybe the car just couldn't handle my crazy ass driving? Maybe it wasn't built for it? Who am I kidding of course it was made for crazy driving. It's a ford. LMAO!

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: Hard to wreck.

Cons: Slow.

1 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Ford TaurusReview
Annalise writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Sucks — none theres nothing much good to say about this car except it lasted approx 17 years and now it stalls out whenever it feels like it so it is not running well anymore. theres longevity to the car, but i dont like it.

Primary Use: Family transportation

Pros: nothing

Cons: everything

2 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Ford Taurus LXReview
Jordan writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

A Crappy Engine From Ford — This car was a mistake on my part. The reason why is I opted for the 3.8 liter V-6 instead of the way more reliable 3.0 V-6. With the larger engine with this car gives you the same amount of horsepower, but with a substantial amount of more torque, that's about it. The negatives when you get this engine. Bad transmissions, head gaskets that need to be replaced about every 50,00 miles, bad motor mounts, pretty much getting the larger V-6 ruins the car. They only used the 3.8 V-6 from 1988 to 1995 in the Ford Taurus. Opt for the smaller 3.0 V-6.

Pros: Good torque....... thinking.

Cons: Mechanical, most major factory parts were intended to last only about 60,000 miles

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Ford Taurus SHOReview
Dillon writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Balla — its nasty. it go fast, which i like. its stop fast too, but who cares about that. pretty all around balla car to have, but only the most balla of ballas like me can drive it, so stay away please

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: cuz i drive it

Cons: cuz i wanna be the only one to drive it

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Ford Taurus SHOReview
James writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

I Love This Car, And I Hope It Never Dies!!!! — Screaming yamaha engine, 5spd manual, Police dont notice you, insurance and taxes are almost nothing. Although its rated at 220hp, and weighs 3300 lbs, you can still whoop a wrx, 9-3 viggen, 3 series bmw, Si civic, and just about any other ricer car or older mustang/camaro out there. did I mention 25-28 mpg hwy? Hope your a mechanic if you own one, as I am. maintenance is very expensive and pretty technical compared to other cars.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: Hauls ass!!

Cons: Costly keep up

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying 1 - 10 of 1992 Ford Taurus 10 reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2019 Ford Taurus Reviews

Review By Guru9WQ6V8

We love our Taurus! Very spacious inside and stunning exterior-stands out from other models. Read More

Review By Collin

The 2019 Ford Taurus Limited comes with every option plus some. It handles great on slick roads. Hard acceleration is impressive. Meaning 0-60 is quick. Only draw back for me is my seat adjustment co... Read More

2018 Ford Taurus Reviews

Review By Gmancoorslt20

Best driving sedan Ive ever owned. The Limited Taurus comes with just about every feature you could want. Read More

Review By jcarlton60

Its a nice looking viechle, and I might would like it more if I could have viewed it from different angle. Read More

2017 Ford Taurus Reviews

Review By Peace942

Love it. Bought it. Tons of features. Lincoln features at a Ford price. SHO is a super nice luxury sports sedan. Read More

Review By Guru9TSQXQ

A bit much. Fair price. Decent car for the price. Read More

2016 Ford Taurus Reviews

Review By Brianna

The car is very sleek & has extremely smooth steering & responsive acceleration. No complaints. Read More

Review By JasonPort

With all the bigger cars going to a 4 cylinder engine this car is is more quiet and smoother. Drove one with 100k still tight and no rattles. Just felt solid well made. All bigger cars should have v8s... Read More

2015 Ford Taurus Reviews

Review By dave

Seemed high in price, not enough pictures of the car Read More

Review By Nick

Car is in the exact condition as described and dealer provided all details on it. Read More

Taurus

Looking for a Used Taurus in your area?

CarGurus has 4,017 nationwide Taurus listings starting at $699.

ZIP:
Have you driven a 1992 Ford Taurus?