Have you driven a 1983 Ford Thunderbird?  
Rank This Car

User Reviews

View reviews where users commented on categories.

Clear selections

Displaying all 1983 Ford Thunderbird reviews reviews.

1983 Ford ThunderbirdReview
douge82 writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

This Car Is A 10 In My Book. — This was my first car 10 years ago, and I still have it. In highschool I built a carberated 302, and got rid of the 3.8. This small change really woke my car up. Then I added a limited slip rear end, and BF Goodrich 275/60/R15's out back. That gave it a muscle car stance. I still think Its cool, and most people tell me they think the same.

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: This car is super easy to work on

Cons: They didn't come with enough power

3 of 4 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
Thunderbird

Looking for a Used Thunderbird in your area?

CarGurus has 762 nationwide Thunderbird listings starting at $6,499.

ZIP:
1983 Ford ThunderbirdReview
Alex writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

I Like It — it handles great and his it own personality looks good and soundspretty cool and it is very soft seats inside but not alot of room in the back seat but who cares your driveing !!! and fun to drive

Pros: handleing

Cons: performince sometimes

1 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1983 Ford ThunderbirdReview
Carl writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Loved This Car — Car was a Turbo Coupe with the Koni suspension. Comfortable, fast, nimble, great on gas, very reliable.

Pros: Performance and fuel mileage

Cons: not a lot of room in car

1 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1983 Ford ThunderbirdReview
Latenitemechanic writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

One Of Ford's Better Cars For 1983 —

I have a 1983 Thunderbird with the 3.8 liter V6 and C5 automatic. It has alot the regular options commonly found on T-Birds: Cruise Control, AC, Tilt Wheel, Power Windows, Power Mirrors, Power Driver Seat, Rear Defroster, map lights. The interior trim is identical to the 'Heritage' edition Thunderbirds but without the decal trim. I believe 1983 was the only year for the vent windows, as I have seen many thunderbirds in the wrecking yards but rarely ever see the vent window that my Bird has. Also, after 1983 ford went to Central Fuel Injection on the 3.8 V6, so finding some parts for my 3.8 carbureted V6 are hard to come by. My T-Bird also came equipped with a vacuum assisted parking brake. I haven't seen it on any other thunderbird, so I think it is also a 1983 only item. Another perculiar item on my Bird is the intake manifold. It is an open plenum (single plane) manifold, not the standard dual plenum manifold found on so many Vee type engines. Because of this, my factory cold start idle is set to 2200 rpms according to the emissions sticker. I have never owned a car that revved so high at startup, and can take up to 10 minutes before the choke relaxes the engine down to 600 rpms. I own a mustang with the CFI equipped 3.8 and recommend the CFI setup over the carbureted version. However, aside from the quirky engine parts, the T-Bird rides so much nicer and is quieter than my mustang. They both share the same FOX body frame and parts, but you can tell Ford spent more time refining the Thunderbird than they did the mustang. The quality of the interior trim, seating, ride quality, and noise reduction make the Thunderbird a much nicer car to drive around in.

Owner for 3 years, 0 months

Miles Driven per Year:20,000

Pros: Quiet, comfortable ride, nice body lines, good interior features

Cons: Carbureted setup for this year is quirky. Central Fuel Injection is so much nicer.

4 of 4 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1983 Ford Thunderbird Heritage Coupe RWD Review
GuruTRQ2L says:
love the sport luxurary,verry relaxing
vs1971 Dodge Charger
1983 Ford Thunderbird Heritage Coupe RWD winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
Front Seats Ranked 1971 Dodge Charger worse.
"deeper cushen"
Would Buy Ranked 1971 Dodge Charger better.
" too close to make a choice"
1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying all 1983 Ford Thunderbird reviews reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2005 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

Review By Guru99B7H5

Fun quiet car to drive. Design is really great. Very comfortable interior. Ford should still make these! Read More

Review By taylor

The 05 T-Bird is as advertised. Fun to drive and in great condition. These Birds seem to keep their value. Read More

2004 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

Review By Guru39MFX

I wanted the late model Thunderbird for the engine features, overall the car was a very good value. It is not a drag racer, it is very fun to drive, top up or top down. It will merge and pass thru tr... Read More

Review By Guru7FLZG

Way over priced if over $10,000 dollars United States currency Read More

2003 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

Review By GuruGM7PC

Great car!! I like it very much. Thank you!! Ok Read More

Review By whitedogdaddy

Car provides excellent handling, comfort and looks. A great cruiser and good gas mileage too! The 280 hp motor comes on a little bit gradually but revs forever. Read More

2002 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

Review By Guru94LQTW

I Love It. It is truly an awesome car. Read More

Review By Guru51NSH

Love the look. It may seem old to most but to me its the car of my dreams! Read More

1997 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

Great Car By Vwags

This car is a joy to drive. The style is very nice and it has the power and handling to support the style. The car gets surprisingly good gas mileage for a V8. I would think long and hard about get... Read More

Impressive By 97TBirdOwner

The Ford Thunderbird in this generation is a very nice mix of performance, luxury, and style. They can be relatively inexpensive if you look around and get lucky. I drive this one daily, and as mentio... Read More

Have you driven a 1983 Ford Thunderbird?  
Rank Your Car →