1972 Chevrolet C/K 10 User Reviews

1972 Chevrolet C/K 10 Top Comparisons

Users ranked 1972 Chevrolet C/K 10 against other cars which they drove/owned. Each ranking was based on 9 categories. Here is the summary of top rankings.

1972 Chevrolet C/K 10 vs:

    Have you driven a 1972 Chevrolet C/K 10?  
    Rank This Car

    User Reviews

    View reviews where users commented on categories.

    Clear selections

    Displaying 1 - 10 of 15 1972 Chevrolet C/K 10 reviews.

    1972 Chevrolet C/K 10 Review
    says:
    vs1972 Ford F-100
    1972 Chevrolet C/K 10 winning categories:
    • Power
    • Handling
    • Looks/Style
    • Front Seats
    • Back Seats
    • Cargo Capacity
    • Family Car
    • Value
    • Would Buy
    Back Seats Ranked 1972 Ford F-100 better.
    "there are none just said ford"
    Family Car Ranked 1972 Ford F-100 better.
    "is pickup just said ford"
    1972 Chevrolet C/K 10Review
    Cargo Capacity:
    Fuel Economy:
    Front Seats:
    Handling:
    Maintenance Cost:
    Price:
    Power:
    Reliability:
    Looks/Style:
    Towing:
    Overall:

    Typical Good Looking Truck — My dad bought me this truck when I was 16. When I moved out of the house he kept it in the garage and drove it every so often. I have had it for the last 3 years. I am planning on putting a new 350 GM crate motor in it soon.

    Primary Use: Family transportation

    Pros: Looks good, Have had it for 20 years

    Cons: Always having motor issues.

    Is this review helpful? Yes | No
    1972 Chevrolet C/K 10Review
    Accessories:
    Brakes:
    Cargo Capacity:
    Daily Commute:
    Fuel Economy:
    Front Seats:
    Handling:
    Interior Noise:
    Long Trips:
    Maintenance Cost:
    Off-Road:
    Parking:
    Price:
    Power:
    Reliability:
    Ride Comfort:
    Looks/Style:
    Towing:
    Visibility:
    Weight:
    Overall:

    Good Solid Truck, Just Know Its Slow And Old And Loud And Bad On Gas. But Thats What Makes It Cool! — This truck is so customiseable its not even funny. the no smog title just adds to this even more. with my 6in,. lift I can conquer virtually and obstacle, add to that the 4wd with transfer case and front locking hubs this is truelly a irresistible offroad crawler. No electronics makes tuning and troubleshooting non-existent. set it and it goes or it doesn't. not half-in-between FI bs.

    Primary Use: Utility (towing boats, transporting cargo, etc.)

    Pros: Great truck, original SUV ( before they became over glorified soccer mom vans), chevy motor simple, powerful, and reliable, every part easily available, TH350 and 350-v8 make for a powerful package good for 250K before a rebuild. Can fit anything(cargo) except fridge due to low ceiling height from dual a/c unit in back. Camping and outdoors vehicle.

    Cons: Gas mileage get about 8mpg, handling not great and breaking is even worse. Interior rattling is really bad.

    Is this review helpful? Yes | No
    1972 Chevrolet C/K 10Review
    Cargo Capacity:
    Fuel Economy:
    Front Seats:
    Handling:
    Maintenance Cost:
    Price:
    Power:
    Reliability:
    Looks/Style:
    Towing:
    Overall:

    Looks Like It Can Handle The Weight Of The World — gas is a pain, gets only 10 mpg ( city ), has a 355 chevi big block in it, putting a 454 big block in it soon, but its been with my dad for about 15 years, he loves it more than me

    Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

    Pros: good handling

    Cons: not the best gas mileage

    Is this review helpful? Yes | No
    1972 Chevrolet C/K 10Review
    Appearance:
    Performance:
    Quality:
    Overall:

    Iit Can Be Worth A Lot Of Money. — They are perty rare now in days. They have different types of motors and customs. They start from a staight 6 all the way up to a big block v-8. Not much at l this was when stuff was built right. One of the most best body styles that cheverolet has ever adfore a truck. This is the only thing i dont like now in days is gas mileage, well the v-8's, but the small block v-8's aint that bad. This truck is very fun to drive its like driven a cadilac.

    Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

    Pros: Its a classic

    Cons: The gas mileage but isnt really that bad for a small block 350

    Is this review helpful? Yes | No
    1972 Chevrolet C/K 10Review
    Appearance:
    Performance:
    Quality:
    Overall:

    I Don't Recommend This Vehicle To Anyone Else! Cause It's Mine!, And You Can't Have It! — Performance: 0-60 in just over 6 seconds and 1 center support bearing, maybe a universal or two. Braking, (original manual brakes) 60-0 in 124 ft, 2 Toyotas and a Honda. Build Quality: Unmatched in 39 years! Appearance: Love the Classic truck look, Work in progress. Cost of Ownership: Working on tuning since new engine, I have reached 16 mpg once or twice. (It's hard to do that when you love the sound of a good 4-bbl!)

    Pros: I Love my truck,  Would never concider owning anything else!

    Cons: Hard to find good 8-Tracks!

    Is this review helpful? Yes | No
    1972 Chevrolet C/K 10Review
    Appearance:
    Performance:
    Quality:
    Overall:

    New Heart For An Old Chevy — I love my baby but she is kicking my ass right now they are alot of work but if you get it done right it works great if its stock with the 350 and the 350 turbo transmission not alot of get off but drop a 454 in it it is basicly a cold air inducted beast

    Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

    Pros: AWESOME

    Cons: Ton of work

    Is this review helpful? Yes | No
    1972 Chevrolet C/K 10Review
    Appearance:
    Performance:
    Quality:
    Overall:

    Its Cool — I like it for a first vehicle. It has a few things wrong with it but nothing that cant be fixed. I think its fun to drive, but im not going to drive it until its fixed up fairly well.

    Primary Use: Commuting to work

    Pros: it looks nice

    Cons: it needs work

    Is this review helpful? Yes | No
    1972 Chevrolet C/K 10Review
    Appearance:
    Performance:
    Quality:
    Overall:

    Fun! — its really my dad's, it was jus my first vehicle to drive....it's pretty badass, gets up and goes! it needs some work and new tires, has some rust, but its fun as hell to drive around since its so loud lol

    Primary Use: Commuting to work

    Pros: its a classic

    Cons: got 8 miles to the gallon

    Is this review helpful? Yes | No
    1972 Chevrolet C/K 10Review
    Appearance:
    Performance:
    Quality:
    Overall:

    Kick Ass Truck — it's not done but it would be a prize after in done already fast and it is just unique and pretty much awesome. power plant is a 350 small block which is stock for the truck and everything that has been done to it was done by me and my dad

    Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

    Pros: it is a 72 chevy

    Cons: nothing

    Is this review helpful? Yes | No

    Displaying 1 - 10 of 15 1972 Chevrolet C/K 10 reviews.

    Reviews From Other Years

    1987 Chevrolet C/K 10 Reviews

    1987 Chevrolet V10(not K10/c10) '87 Was Vin Coded Differently.... By Christian

    got this truck from a guy that was hard up for money... the thing only cost me $150 and with the minor repair work that i have done to it i only have $1200 into the truck. the mileage is terrible bu... Read More

    Great Recreational Vehicle ! By JacKOozy

    This Chevy K-10 P/U is white with black brush guard, blk roll bar and blk nurf bars. This vehicle now has Rancho six inch lift with 35 x 12.5 x 17 AT tires. Also has an upgraded 350 cu vs the origina... Read More

    1986 Chevrolet C/K 10 Reviews

    1986 Chevy K10 By UnexpectedK10

    I got this truck to help me learn the ins and outs of a real mans truck. And Ive learned so much, and would love all the input and help I can get? Lets talk trucks and share experiences about this tru... Read More

    Gorgeous By John

    Previous owner kept this truck in amazing condition, $1250 and needs about $250 in parts. Its a GM can't ask for better quality. Going to add the dual headlight grill, replace the rear view mirror wit... Read More

    1985 Chevrolet C/K 10 Reviews

    Comfortable, Good Looking, Reliable Old Truck. By andrew_bergh

    There are no blind spots, which is one of my favorite things about it. You can see everything in the mirrors and just by looking. It's comfortable to drive, but you really can't take more than 1 perso... Read More

    Too Fun By Andy

    preformace is good with the ledgendary chevy 350 small block built like a tank cause well its all sheet metal apperace is very classic square body truck not great gas mileage but that's not what yo... Read More

    1984 Chevrolet C/K 10 Reviews

    Offroad Machine By Hutch998

    Truck is very very nice offroad. I bought it for a grand, It requires hundreds upon hundreds of dollars in DIY repairs (to a well trained mechanic) Rusts very fast, but very workable. Almost/ if not a... Read More

    Ehhh It Is What It Is. By Don

    Gutless 305. A 350 would be better. The body on these truck rust out and the look is old. This truck never gets stuck and hauls whatever I need. The brakes are awesome and its fun in the winter. It ... Read More

    1983 Chevrolet C/K 10 Reviews

    A Cruise Night Ride By James

    owned many enjoyable rods ,this became a good one ,, handling, power,comfort,sound,and the style of a 5 inch chopped top,would have no less, didn;t build this one myself, just a few mods. for myself, ... Read More

    Great Toy By Kyle

    My truck was great! i beat the tar out of it!!! got it stuck 2 times in some pretty nasty stuff! suspension sucked! 6in of leaf springs is a rough ride... did great in hill climbs and could pull any... Read More

    Cars compared to 1972 Chevrolet C/K 10People researching a 1972 Chevrolet C/K 10 contacted a dealer about

    C/K 10

    Looking for a Used C/K 10 in your area?

    CarGurus has 284 nationwide C/K 10 listings and the tools to find you a great deal.

    ZIP:
    Have you driven a 1972 Chevrolet C/K 10?  
    Rank Your Car →