Have you driven a 1965 Ford Thunderbird?  
Rank This Car

User Reviews

View reviews where users commented on categories.

Clear selections

Displaying 1 - 10 of 1965 Ford Thunderbird 10 reviews.

1965 Ford Thunderbird Review
Larry says:
Had one when they were new and always regretted getting rid of it. Great cruiser. Comfortable, roomy, and maintenance is not too bad. Parts readily available in most cases.
vs1965 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class
1965 Ford Thunderbird winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
Family Car Ranked 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class worse.
"As I said, it is roomy with a VERY large trunk for family luggage."
Would Buy Ranked 1965 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class worse.
"Much easier to get parts and service for the Thunderbird."
10 of 10 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1965 Ford ThunderbirdReview
maxfli writes:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

My Dream Car — I love this car and am looking forward to finishing the restoration and getting back to driving it..My Thunderbird has always given me smile each time I take it out for a spin. I have been using the Thunderbird again on a regular basis and as long as the sun is shining and no chance of rain I can be spotted in Sunset Beach.

Pros: The Thunderbird has been in our family for 48 years. I have always enjoyed driving it. The car is now over 95% restored and am looking forward to the final touches so I can be done.

Cons: Trouble finding someone who can get the hydraulic trunk working.  Over the years it has been a problem area. Would love to fix it once and for all.

13 of 13 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1965 Ford ThunderbirdReview
barneuma writes:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

I Love It — It sits very low.has smooth shift,heater is hot a/c is cold & clock works,total rebuild in 2001 & no rust at all.Brakes are good but needs a dual chamber master cylinder & porportioning valve.All electrical items work.I have a little problem of loosing vacume,I may need new hoses in doors.

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: Rides very smooth & has great torque

Cons: Uses a lot of fuel & convertible is tempermental

7 of 7 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1965 Ford ThunderbirdReview
hills101803 writes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

Classic T-bird, Little Tlc To Get Perfect — I like the exhaust note of the 390 V8, doesn't compare to modern cars. Easy handling, great stopping power. Wish the paint wasn't faded, it would be a great cruiser with fresh paint, or a future hot rod candidate, or rat rod.

Pros: Classic style, new carpet, new tires, registered as a classic through 2018, street legal

Cons: Needs paint

4 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1965 Ford ThunderbirdReview
Joseph writes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

A Beautiful And Classy Looking Car, That Gets Better With Age. — I like the comfort, and the power of the 390 C.I. The styling is beautiful. When these cars were new and a few years after, they were basically good cars. The construction and fit of the car was better build quality than the Mustang another Ford product. It's competitor at the time was the Buick Riviera, which was a very well made car at the time. I think the Ford Thunderbird Hdtp. is under-rated and under-valued!

Pros: A comfortable riding car. The rear seat is like seating on a couch.

Cons: The gas mileage, but again you are not buying this car for the gas mileage.

10 of 11 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1965 Ford ThunderbirdReview
Larry writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

I Am A Happy Old Camper — This was a real jewel when it came out in 65. Front disk brakes, sequential tail lights and more. I had one when they were new and always regretted getting rid of it. I had always collected foreign cars and lost a 67 Jaguar XKE and a 87 Jaguar XJ6 in Katrina and said I would not ever buy another classic. Well, I lied. When this came up, I couldn't resist so here it is. It is a road car, very comfortable, not real fast (0 to 60 in about 12 seconds) lousy gas mileage (7-10mpg) but gas was about 40 cents a gal in 65 and we never thought about it. I think it is one of the best body designs to come out of Detroit in the last fifty years. I have not had to do much to it but I am getting ready to re-chrome the bumpers and replace all the rubber bushings. We, (my wife and I) enjoy cruising and car shows with it.

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: Looks, Looks, Looks

Cons: Only if you can't afford it.

8 of 8 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1965 Ford ThunderbirdReview
T_birdman65 writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

The Head Turner — Got me one of the 65 "jet birds". She's beautiful. She's my first car and I got her for only $3,200 with only 62,000 original miles! Not a thing wrong with her except the need for some new heads. I love the black leather interior, the swing away steering wheel, the big backseat and trunk. I like the 390 big block under the hood but the speed and acceleration it puts out leave alot to be desired. Im sure this is due to the sheer weight of the big car though. She rides smooth with a little wiggle to the steering thanks again to the size but there's not much else to really dislike. The fuel economy aint great but that's a small price to pay for such a beautiful classic and will probably improve with some new heads. Real tight car with no rattle and a nice roar when you rev her up. Turns heads and drops jaws with her baby blue paint.

Pros: Style and luxury

Cons: High fuel consumption

11 of 11 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1965 Ford ThunderbirdReview
Eric writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Funky Fresh — The Ford 390 engine block is large by today's standards but can't compete with the Chevy blocks of the same vintage. Nonetheless, unmodified stock this car is a ton of fun to drive and is the safest two-door detroit steel you can be in these days!

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: style

Cons: if you are a gas miser

4 of 4 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1965 Ford ThunderbirdReview
Eamonn writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Ahead Of Its Time — Big block ford engine provided enough performance, but fuel economy was not good lol, but again its not the kind of car you buy for good mpg, Stunning looks, most parts still available, and a fun 60s luxury muscle car

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: Great looking futuristic car

Cons: MPG lol

4 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1965 Ford ThunderbirdReview
Mike writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

6t5 Bird — Wish I had it running! Was purchased in 1983 by my dad. He told me if I made it through basic training the car was mine. Car is originally from Cali. He found in Florida. Has about 120K on it. Car turns over but needs a full engine overhaul. No rust. Im planning on doing a full restoration but the $ for parts for these cars are not cheap! 390c, rated @ 315hp. has the swing away steering wheel.1st year for the famous sequential taillights. Fell free to contact Chip Foose for me and tell him I could use some help!!

Pros: Will have it forever.

Cons: Not running!

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying 1 - 10 of 1965 Ford Thunderbird 10 reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2005 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

Review By Guru99B7H5

Fun quiet car to drive. Design is really great. Very comfortable interior. Ford should still make these! Read More

Review By taylor

The 05 T-Bird is as advertised. Fun to drive and in great condition. These Birds seem to keep their value. Read More

2004 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

Review By Guru39MFX

I wanted the late model Thunderbird for the engine features, overall the car was a very good value. It is not a drag racer, it is very fun to drive, top up or top down. It will merge and pass thru tr... Read More

Review By Guru7FLZG

Way over priced if over $10,000 dollars United States currency Read More

2003 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

Review By GuruGM7PC

Great car!! I like it very much. Thank you!! Ok Read More

Review By whitedogdaddy

Car provides excellent handling, comfort and looks. A great cruiser and good gas mileage too! The 280 hp motor comes on a little bit gradually but revs forever. Read More

2002 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

Review By Guru94LQTW

I Love It. It is truly an awesome car. Read More

Review By Guru51NSH

Love the look. It may seem old to most but to me its the car of my dreams! Read More

1997 Ford Thunderbird Reviews

Great Car By Vwags

This car is a joy to drive. The style is very nice and it has the power and handling to support the style. The car gets surprisingly good gas mileage for a V8. I would think long and hard about get... Read More

Impressive By 97TBirdOwner

The Ford Thunderbird in this generation is a very nice mix of performance, luxury, and style. They can be relatively inexpensive if you look around and get lucky. I drive this one daily, and as mentio... Read More

Cars compared to 1965 Ford Thunderbird

Thunderbird

Looking for a Used Thunderbird in your area?

CarGurus has 762 nationwide Thunderbird listings starting at $6,499.

ZIP:
Have you driven a 1965 Ford Thunderbird?  
Rank Your Car →