1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Reviews, Pricing & Specs
Overview
The 1996 Monte Carlo was available in two trims: the LS coupe and the sporty Z34. Each had a GM Hydra-matic four-speed electric automatic...
The 1996 Monte Carlo was available in two trims: the LS coupe and the sporty Z34. Each had a GM Hydra-matic four-speed electric automatic transmission with powertrain control.
The LS came standard with a 3.1-liter V6 rated at 160 horsepower, while the Z34 had a 210-horsepower V6. Drivers of this car love the peppy engine, especially on the Z34, as well as the sleek look and such luxuries as leather power seats. Gas mileage does not suffer much for the power: the LS gets 20 mpg city/29 mpg highway, and the Z34 is rated at 17/26.
What owners say
"Overall, drivers have a positive view of the 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, appreciating its reliability, classic style, and decent gas mileage. Many enjoy its performance, especially when fitted with the right enhancements. However, some feel it lacks power and speed, and a few have noted issues with parts and engine performance as these cars age."
this car is a very reliable car, black 3.4DOHC bout 220hp, 230lbs torque. rocker panels rot before the engine goes, very reliable transportation. very easy to customize interior. this is not a persons first car, needs to be taken care of in order to save her. :)
June 15, 2009Customized with a Brickyard 400 package. I was the original owner and drove it for over 8 years before it started to nickel and dime me to death. Unfortunately I had to get rid of it. This was one of the best cars I ever owned or drove.
January 27, 2009The Car drives good up to about 85k, then the check engine light comes on that it's misfiring, and almost every sensor goes bad.
February 23, 2008What owners say
this car is a very reliable car, black 3.4DOHC bout 220hp, 230lbs torque. rocker panels rot before the engine goes, very reliable transportation. very easy to customize interior. this is not a persons first car, needs to be taken care of in order to save her. :)
June 15, 2009Customized with a Brickyard 400 package. I was the original owner and drove it for over 8 years before it started to nickel and dime me to death. Unfortunately I had to get rid of it. This was one of the best cars I ever owned or drove.
January 27, 2009The Car drives good up to about 85k, then the check engine light comes on that it's misfiring, and almost every sensor goes bad.
February 23, 2008This vehicle does ok on MPG but lacks the horse power. Other than it needs more horse power it's a very good and reliable vehicle. The ride is nice and smooth. At high speed it might need to be a little tighter. It like to start floating at about 110 MPA.
September 1, 2011very nice vehicle thatll last for ever. just right for the right person. thought i could find a better car ,but when i found this car with low mileage. i said its a winner. hope whoever gets a monte keeps it
January 30, 2011Great Car. I havent had a problem with it since ive had it. Great on gas, cheap parts, is able to go when floored in cases. Since it is a older car it needs struts for a comfort ride. Hope this car lasts for many years.
July 8, 2009The 1996 Chevy Monte Carlo Z-34 is a racy, NASCAR-inspired two-door sport coupe. The vehicle has ample power from the 3.4L engine, and the available exterior and interior accessory options make for a very personalized vehicle. The LS coupe came with a 3.1L V-6 engine, which is known for blowing head gaskets (same engine as the Chevy Cavalier). The Z-34 is an excellent powerhouse which is hard to work on, based on how it is sandwiched into the engine compartment, but which on the whole will not spend too much time being worked on anyway, as it is a driver, not a trailer queen. The interior on these is large enough that a tall guy can drive the car comfortably (a problem for me with newer cars). This is what drew me to the vehicle.
July 27, 2007it's my baby, my first car. Granted it's an older car but it runs very well for its age. It's needed very few repairs and they were cheap. No unwanted noise. I like the overall look of the car, esp. the tint (: gas mileage is what is expected, and it's a nice car to drive overall because you really don't see many of these anymore... especially this well-taken-care-of.
September 20, 2009Amazing car, never had a better one.. its fast, sleek, and stylish.. power up the ying-yang.. few upgrades just put in it. no backseat less weight.. acceleration could be a bit faster but the body style makes up for it. it handles like a dream from 0-60. cant beat it
December 2, 2008First new car I owned after graduating from college. Was a MC fan since I owned a '79 MC and my dad owned/owns several others ('72, '96, '00, '06). Bad part about the car - the gaskets leaked and went out about 65K miles.
September 14, 2010
