Have you driven a 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo?  
Rank This Car

User Reviews

View reviews where users commented on categories.

Clear selections

Displaying 1 - 10 of 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 10 reviews.

1979 Chevrolet Monte CarloReview
Brittany Lyn writes:
Back Seats:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

Does What It Needs To — This is my show car so it doesn't go out other than for shows The acceleration, braking, and handling are all decent for the age of the car The interior is in the process of being redone and the exterior looks great for it's age The gas is decent since again it doesn't go out all that much

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: It is a great show car

Cons: it stalls when she first gets started only because she needs some work done on the carborator

6 of 6 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1979 Chevrolet Monte CarloReview
ruch writes:
Cargo Capacity:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:

A True Classic — Mostly is the classic styling and individuality that the car exudes. A secondary point is the extremly comfortable ride, whether you're driving it, or a passenger. The size of the car is also impressive, as the styling makes it look larger than it actually is. They just don't design cars like this anymore.

Pros: One of the best looking cars ever! Absolutly a head turner, they don't desigh cars like this anymore. The ride feels like your driving a sofa down the road. On a long trip you arrive without"road fatigue".

Cons: Harder to find parts...Not very goiod gas milage...People wanting to buy this car from you to make it into a "lowrider" (like the "Training Day" movie.

4 of 4 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1979 Chevrolet Monte CarloReview
Stacey writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

You Can Never Have Enough Of Them. — Love these cars this Is my 5th one, Ive had one with a moonroof, and three hard tops and this one with the t-tops. I personally feel that these are the best looking Monte Carlos ever built, cant understand why G.M. only produced them for three years. The short production run does mean less available parts, so you have to learn what interchanges with other G.M. models.

Pros: They are fun to drive, easy to modify for power, and with the later SS models selling so well ther are suspension kits to improve handling.

Cons: They can become an obsession.

4 of 4 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1979 Chevrolet Monte CarloReview
Jonathan writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Great Looking Classic — While built during a depressing time for automobile, this can is amazing. The original 140 hp 305 CID V8 is well underpowered. Even so, it is a fun car to drive being under 3100 pounds. This is one of the best looking cars of the time. Long swooping lines give this car a larger appearance than it really is. There is great style on all corners of the car. This car has been commonly used for low-riders so finding a solid Monte Carlo can be difficult. To add, finding replacement parts can get expensive if you can find them. The counter is you can pick up on of these fairly cheap.

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: Beautiful looks and fun to drive.

Cons: Under powered and difficult finding new parts

5 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1979 Chevrolet Monte CarloReview
John writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Wish I Still Had It And Hope To Rebuild Her Someday,just A Little More Updated. — She was my first,and best looking of any car i've owned.Handled like it was on rails and enough power to keep anyone pinned to the back of their seat.It had a decent ground effects package and was painted a metallic light brown with matching rims.Limo tint damn near on all windows,tinted headlight covers with heartbeat lines done in white pinstripping and the same across the rear window. The lines had only one beat showing cause she would stop your heart for a moment when she rolled by.

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: For me personally,there will be no other.

Cons: There is no reason to avoid it,but i'm biased.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1979 Chevrolet Monte CarloReview
Alex writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

'79 Monte Carlo — Well first off I'm only 16 so I basically use it to run to school, work, some car shows, and wherever else I need to go. Right now it has a small block chevy 350 with a rochester 4-barrel quadrajet carb and a superstock cam in it, otherwise its basically stock. Overall it runs great, sounds excellent with the true-dual exhaust and dual glasspacks, and is pretty reliable for an older car. It is a two tone car with black up top and silver below with an arcticat green flame lick separating the two. I do have some pictures but only from when my uncle Dean and I did the painting but hopefully I will get some more. I got it when I was 14 for $800. I have been working with Dean at my grandpa's repair shop, Dan's Repair, since I was 11 so I had a nice chunk of money in the bank. Across the cost of paint, rebuilding the engine, regular restoration parts, and aftermarket interior panels I've only spent about $5,400. Engiine runs great, puts out about 370 horsepower and 390 ft. lbs. of torque and will still get about 20-24 mpg.

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: fairly inexpensive to restore, can do pretty much anything to the engine and drivetrain since it doesn't have any of today's fancy computers

Cons: not really anything, I mean this car is a blast to drive and gets a lot of stares as I roll into the grocery store or gas station

5 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1979 Chevrolet Monte CarloReview
Jeremiah writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

My 79 Monte — loved the car was best i ever had and would buy another in blink of an eye. wasnt best looking when i got it but a few dollars later it was decent lookin peformance was great had a chevy smallblock 350 i had probs with the alternator and battery but i was pulling almost 4000 watts with my stereo system car handled great and was and is still my dream car.

Pros: great ride handles well

Cons: mine wasnt the best in terms of the body.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1979 Chevrolet Monte CarloReview
David writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Great Car — 305 engine with a 4 barrel carburetor, i upgraded the trans from a 200 to a 350turbo. It is a 2 tone blue. 190,000 miles. This car is in the process of being restored, the engine will be taken out and redone, and the interior will be redone. The car might end up black after all is said and done.

Pros: No rust on the car, the body is in great shape for a 79.

Cons: Needs some interior trim. with gas prices does not make for a good day to day car

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1979 Chevrolet Monte CarloReview
Robert writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Solid As A Rock — Beautiful exterior, spotless interior, great ride, lots of power, I'd recommend this car to anyone

Pros: Incredibly smooth ride, power everything

Cons: Automatic transmission shift shock

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1979 Chevrolet Monte CarloReview
ckobbs writes:
Overall:

I Loved It When I Had It As A Teenager. — My first car. It was great. I put Cragar rims with deep dish on the back. Only problem was the rims didn't fit due to the drum brake weight so the back end shaked violently over 65mph. It had a 287 V-8. It always started and was a warrior on road trips. It was a Landau Maroon with Maroon interior. Bench front seat.

Pros: The size was perfect.

Cons: None that I would admit

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying 1 - 10 of 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 10 reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Reviews

Review By Guru95JZ83

Car is as shown online. Seems to be an issue with the air conditioner that was not disclosed. Read More

Review By GuruJB98Z

Its an amazing car in general it grips turns at low and high speeds. The only downside is that you may run into some transmission issues with the vehicle. Id give it 5 stars but, fwd somewhat hurts ... Read More

2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Reviews

Review By mr.

I love this car , the way it feels when Im driving it Read More

Review By mcgpboo

This Mont e carl o is beautiful.. The ride is great and the look is great Read More

2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Reviews

Review By Rayland

The car runs and drives good but has slight body damage but overall it is a great car. Read More

Review By Cedric

Great car isnt missing anything.someone should buy it. Great price Read More

2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Reviews

Review By Beverly

Monte Carlos are great cars. They have enough room to be comfortable Read More

Average But Respectful Car To Have In You Driveway By cholo33

This car has never failed me once, little things here and there but nothing mechanically wrong. It has some style to it but lacks the power off the supercharged SS. It does however have a lot of the s... Read More

2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Reviews

Review By Guru3CZK8

Nice, clean, & great, a dream for me& probably all. Read More

Love It By Randyracer

just recently got the car and havent had too much time behind the wheel but being a GM driver this is one of their nicer mid range sports cars, doesnt compare to my 93 camaro but still love it none th... Read More

Monte Carlo

Looking for a Used Monte Carlo in your area?

CarGurus has 331 nationwide Monte Carlo listings starting at $2,995.

ZIP:
Have you driven a 1979 Chevrolet Monte Carlo?  
Rank Your Car →