View reviews where users commented on categories.
Clear selectionsDisplaying 1 - 10 of 30 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser reviews.
|
2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Review
I had this car for a year nice 80000 miles. Soon after I bought it, a check engine light came on. My power steering fuel pump needed to be replaced. (Had troubles even going around a curve) I had to replace 3 motor mounts and my radiator. After all that, not even a month later my head gasket was shot. It shut off on me WHILE DRIVING! Out of nowhere. I had to fight to get $300 out of it. I bought it for $3500. Do not buy this car it is just going to hurt you later down the road. I had it for about 6 months... vs2000 Ford Ranger
2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser winning categories:
Handling
Ranked 2000 Ford Ranger better.
"The steering didnt go out."
Looks/Style
Ranked 2000 Ford Ranger better.
"The ranger just looks better to me. The style of the cruiser is a little bit older."
Front Seats
Ranked 2000 Ford Ranger worse.
"They are separate. Both were equally comfy."
Back Seats
Ranked 2000 Ford Ranger worse.
"The PT cruiser had more room for legs. The seats in the truck are sideways."
Cargo Capacity
Ranked 2000 Ford Ranger better.
"The truck has a bed which can be used for groceries with out taking up so much space like the car had a limited before it was by our feets."
Family Car
Ranked 2000 Ford Ranger worse.
"Not very much to in the cab of a truck."
Value
Ranked 2000 Ford Ranger better.
"Although its more miles, it has had less problems than the cruiser" Looking for a Used PT Cruiser in your area?CarGurus has 1,284 nationwide PT Cruiser listings starting at $1,595. |
|
2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT Wagon FWDReview
Very Good. — I've had the car about 3 years. Bought it with about 81000 on it and it now has 91000. Haven't had any problems whatsoever with this car. Just change the oil every 3000, changed the plugs and plug wires and the air cleaner. Oh yeah, a volo chip for performance and one size larger tires(215x50x17). That's about it and it handles well with plenty of power. This thing would outrun most V8s I've owned over the years, and some were fairly fast. 69 Camero 327, 73 Gran Sport 350, 72 Torino 351, 5.0 Mustang, and many more. It just moves pretty good with the tubo spooled up. Pros: Very fast for a four cylinder and handles well. Cons: Changing the timing belt at specified interval was difficult. |
|
2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Touring Wagon FWDReview
Over All I Am Very Happy With The Style Quality And Performance — Alignment never seems to be right. even after new tires, new brakes, the works. This car is still despite any flaws one of my favorites to drive. fits my life style perfect.for hauling children, taking trips. Garage sales, shopping . Easy to load fun to drive very good handling in winter weather even without snow tires. Primary Use: Family transportation Pros: I love the cargo space I can fit 1/2 sheet plywood 10' boards dressers, chairs you name it I've most likely transported it with in reason people ! Cons: door locks have locked me out. safety nice auto lock annoying |
|
2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Wagon FWDReview
Not Lovin' It. — It was fun for the first couple of years. Now I drive it because it's paid off. I will (Lord willing) NEVER own another Chrysler product again. My Toyota Truck - 138,000 trouble-free miles. Had the clutch replaced at about 135,000 miles. Never leaked oil. Never was low. Never had transmission leak. Never had to top off fluids or even add coolant. Reservoirs were always full. Fluid always clean. Jump to PT Cruiser with Mercedes at the helm. This car is a giant bag of suck. It drinks oil like a drunken sailor on shore leave. No oil leaks - it just gets consumed by the car. No blue smoke. Passed 100% of emissions tests every year for 12 years. Where is the oil going??? My theory is my car is hoarding the motor oil in case of some emergency, for when the cars all become sentient and kill us off; that way it'll have what it needs. Rear tire alignment - the car is "off" from the factory and is fixed in this position - they cannot be aligned. Thanks for that, Chrysler. Because of this, I need tires more often than and was informed by the tech that shims could be installed but they wouldn't really fix the issue. Performance - Maybe most other drivers don't know how to squeeze anything out of an engine smaller than 5.7L but the 2.4L does an okay job, given how tiny it is in relation to the weight and non-aerodynamic shape of the vehicle. Non-turbo does just fine. Has good torque and is fast for what it is if I want to lean on the pedal in the lower gears. Manual transmission probably helps with performance. Fuel economy is horrible in the city - like 18-19 MPG, which would be okay if the engine was more powerful... If I'm on the freeway driving to San Antonio, it'll pull 30 MPG. If I'm doing mixed commuting/ city driving, then average of about 24MPG. With good tires, the car handles great. I've had 10 years out of the replacement brakes. Still no chirping, squealing or issues with discs. No uneven wear, no warping (but then I don't brake like a maniac, either). It's not the worst car I've owned (that goes to a 1996 Pontiac Grand Am) but it's definitely not the best. Can't wait to retire this vehicle. Primary Use: Family transportation
Pros:
Reliable, if you keep getting it repaired.
Cons:
Repairs. Frequent and costly. Engine compartment is ridiculously small. Had to pay an obscene amount of money to have belts and timing chain replaced. |
|
2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Wagon FWDReview
Great Little Family Car Or Perfect For College Student. — I loved this car but realized after I purchased it I needed an automatic. No other problems or complaints about this car at all. I would recommend this car for any small family, student, elderly person or anyone wanting a great little sporty and peppy ride. So much fun to drive. Thank you, D.Lodge Primary Use: Family transportation Pros: This little 5-speed was the best car on gas I have ever owned. I could not believe the difference in power and fuel economy compared to my 2002 automatic Limited Edition Cons: I just could not handle shifting gears due to a medical problem with my foot and leg but no cons with the car. |
|
2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Wagon FWDReview
Great Value In A Basic Transportation, Yet Cool Auto — The only problem encountered to date was a broken timing belt at 91,000. Other than that, I keep it well maintained, and it keeps running!! Not only reliable, but it's a cool ride!! I need 6 more words, there we go. Primary Use: Commuting to work Pros: Low maintenance...only need to be kind and generous to your fluids Cons: Not a lot of power, headlights tend to be aimed low due to the vehicle slant |
|
2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Touring Wagon FWDReview
Decent Car, But Chrysler's Quality Or Lack Of Shines Through — We've owned this car for just over 5 years, it has been pretty dependable. It had a few issues that were fixed under warranty but the service departments at the two dealers made me wonder if they knew what they were doing. While I can't speak for every dealer the 2 I've dealt with weren't very helpful. I had better luck doing it myself. Pros: It drives pretty good, interior styling is kinda cool with the two tone black and red leather and color matched dash. Cons: Under powered, tight engine bay which makes it hard to work on. Dealers service departments not very helpful. |
|
2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT Wagon FWDReview
Project Car — It still needs some improvements and upgrades. I just sold my Mitsubishi Eclipse GT and this bug is my new project. I hope to make a little monster out of it. The clutch just gave out, but I thinks the previous owner did not really know how to drive the manual transmission. I plan to lower the car and improve its stability by installing stability bars (sway bars). Then I want to install a Magnaflow exhaust system and improved downpipe and cat. The electrical system also requires a serious stabilization. I have a voltage stabilizer from my Eclipse. I will install it soon when I receive additional ground wires. I already installed new rotors and new ceramic pads. All in all, it should be a nice ride when I am done with it. Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) Pros: Size, US made, Turbo Cons: Stability |
|
2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Touring Wagon FWDReview
Nice Looking — pretty peppy for a 4 cylinder Love the color and the interior wish the gas milage was better nice wheels but would like newer rims fun to drive would like to drive the turbo version of this car that would be fun Primary Use: Commuting to work Pros: Nice Interior Cons: havent figured out whats wrong with it |
|
2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT Wagon FWDReview
Umm It's Awesome — I love this car, saw it on the lot and decided not to test drive and just buy and I was not let down. AWESOME!!!!!! It has it all performance, appearance (black, sleek, and sexy with the perfect flames of coarse). Turbo, don't want anything less than that. gas mileage is great. And it very fast. Primary Use: Commuting to work Pros: Everything is awesome about my car Cons: I cannot think of anything that sucks about my car. |
Displaying 1 - 10 of 30 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser reviews.
Cars compared to 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser
Looking for a Used PT Cruiser in your area?
CarGurus has 1,284 nationwide PT Cruiser listings starting at $1,595.