1999 Nissan Pathfinder Reviews, Pricing & Specs
What owners say
"Overall, owners of the 1999 Nissan Pathfinder appreciate its reliability, strong performance, and spaciousness, making it a trusted companion for various driving conditions. Many liked how it handles well in adverse weather and off-road situations, highlighting its robust mechanics and power. However, some noted concerns regarding fuel economy and the interior quality, which felt somewhat cheap compared to newer models."
The engine is well powered for the car, with nice gears and a short final drive (4.35?) to compensate for the weight. The fit an finish of the interior is superb. No part of the car has failed on me. 150000 miles, no chronic problems, save for a mysterious vibration i cant seem to locate. The ride is comfortable, and the suspension take bumps and dings very well. Speed bumps and tables are no match for struts on all wheels. I hit a speed table, got a foot of air, and still didnt bottom out the suspension. Ride height is great. Body leans on tight turns, but its not a sports car.
September 14, 2009Not great gas mileage but acceptable. 99 was voted one of Nissan's best year for great mechanical reliability. Great handling in snow,rain and modest off road activity. Has a good set of running lights for fog and darkened wooded areas. Real roomy and spacious for trips: gear,sporting equipment and can easily carry or tow boats,campers,canoes, kyaaks,bikes, and trailers.
May 13, 2014My first Pathfinder was a '95, which I ran for ten years before the frame rusted out. Its replacement, a '99 early model, is much more car-like, albiet a large, heavy car. It is strong and well built, with no frame to rust. After a year and a half with the '99, and all maintenance completed, I would not hesitate to drive this vehicle cross country.
November 27, 2011What owners say
The engine is well powered for the car, with nice gears and a short final drive (4.35?) to compensate for the weight. The fit an finish of the interior is superb. No part of the car has failed on me. 150000 miles, no chronic problems, save for a mysterious vibration i cant seem to locate. The ride is comfortable, and the suspension take bumps and dings very well. Speed bumps and tables are no match for struts on all wheels. I hit a speed table, got a foot of air, and still didnt bottom out the suspension. Ride height is great. Body leans on tight turns, but its not a sports car.
September 14, 2009Not great gas mileage but acceptable. 99 was voted one of Nissan's best year for great mechanical reliability. Great handling in snow,rain and modest off road activity. Has a good set of running lights for fog and darkened wooded areas. Real roomy and spacious for trips: gear,sporting equipment and can easily carry or tow boats,campers,canoes, kyaaks,bikes, and trailers.
May 13, 2014My first Pathfinder was a '95, which I ran for ten years before the frame rusted out. Its replacement, a '99 early model, is much more car-like, albiet a large, heavy car. It is strong and well built, with no frame to rust. After a year and a half with the '99, and all maintenance completed, I would not hesitate to drive this vehicle cross country.
November 27, 2011It was as I would expect . A car that old is going to have some wear and tear . But it runs fine and that’s a plus . A little TLC and it will be a nice reliable vehicle for some time .
December 22, 2021the appearance is decent. headlights are efficent for the year it was made. 4X4 system is virtually bulletproof and a great family vehicle. inside build is a little plasticy wouldn't recommend towing a whole lot. fair power not so great fuel mileage i average 14MPG in the city
February 25, 2015Trims & specs
Base MSRP $31,719 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 38.0 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $29,719 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 38.0 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $31,069 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 38.0 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $24,669 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 38.0 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $26,669 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 38.0 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $26,819 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 38.0 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $28,819 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 38.0 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $33,469 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 38.0 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $29,769 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 38.0 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $27,769 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 38.0 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $29,769 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 38.0 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
