1997 Ford Explorer Reviews, Pricing & Specs































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Overview
New options on the 1997 Ford Explorer offered buyers of America's most popular SUV more choices under the hood. In addition to the 4.9...
New options on the 1997 Ford Explorer offered buyers of America's most popular SUV more choices under the hood. In addition to the 4.9 liter, 210-horsepower V-8 engine introduced in 1996, the '97 Explorer also came off the line with an optional single overhead cam 4.0 liter V-6 which delivered 205 horsepower.
Agility was also a selling point for the '97 Ford Explorer: real all-wheel drive was available for the first time on the Eddie Bauer and Limited trims. In addition to those higher-end trim selections, the 1997 Explorer was offered in Sport, XL, and XLT trims, with a choice of two-door and four-door body styles.
Fuel efficiency wasn't bad by sport-utility vehicle standards: 14 to 18 mpg city, 17 to 23 mpg highway, depending on model, engine, and bodystyle, were the EPA's estimates. The Ford Explorer continued to outsell other vehicles in its class because of its affordability, durability, and superior cargo capacity.
Some drivers love this workhorse for toting the family around; others like to take the four-wheel drive or all-wheel drive versions on off-road adventures. Either way, the 1997 Ford Explorer has lasting appeal.
What owners say
"Overall, drivers appreciate the 1997 Ford Explorer for its reliability and fun driving experience, despite some complaints about gas mileage and performance issues. Many enjoy its spacious interior and comfort, especially for taller individuals. On the downside, several drivers note that it's a gas guzzler and can be top-heavy, affecting handling on rough terrain."
Performance- Stock V6 is kinda ho' hum on acceleration, but then again a SUV is not a racing car. I am eventually gonna do a superchip, cold air intake, and exhaust to get another 20hp or so. Build Quality- The used 97 I got is pretty damn good overall. I need to do a couple minor things for the interior, but those I can find at the junk yard pretty cheap. As far as squeaks and rattles, just the normal on suspension, road noise is OK, but not really loud, and handling is pretty good for regular driving. I haven't done any off roading on it yet. Appearance- I would say the interior of the used 97 I got is a 9 out of 10. There are a couple of little things I need to do, but for a car that is over 10 years old it's very clean. Cost of Ownership- When I bought the car I knew I would have to put some money on top of what I paid for it. So far nothing unusual. It needed new brakes, Rea Sway Bar work, and some new lower ball joins. I have to point out that this rig has 122K on it, so over all not bad. Just normal wear and needing to replace a few things. Main thing is the eninge and transmission is still in tip top shape, running and idling like new. Cost of Ownership- I just got it, but I can allready say that gas milleage isn't that great. Maybe 14-15 city, around 20 hwy. Then again it's an SUV and a heavy rig to boot. So I didn't buy the rig expecting to get 20-30 mpg. Fun Factor- Car is awesome to drive. It handles well for city driving as long as you don't treat it like a wannabe race car, and I can't wait to see how it does with a bit of off roading when I stiffin up the suspension, and chasi next year.
August 26, 2010Enjoyed owning this truck. AWD rocks.
December 23, 2007i think it's a nice vehicle overall. but due to a high profile and narrow stance, it does like to lean on fast turns. it has a decent-sized 4.0 v6 which is pretty good on acceleration for a truck but requires quite a push going up steep hills. the interior has well placed switches and a good display of gauges.
June 25, 2008What owners say
Performance- Stock V6 is kinda ho' hum on acceleration, but then again a SUV is not a racing car. I am eventually gonna do a superchip, cold air intake, and exhaust to get another 20hp or so. Build Quality- The used 97 I got is pretty damn good overall. I need to do a couple minor things for the interior, but those I can find at the junk yard pretty cheap. As far as squeaks and rattles, just the normal on suspension, road noise is OK, but not really loud, and handling is pretty good for regular driving. I haven't done any off roading on it yet. Appearance- I would say the interior of the used 97 I got is a 9 out of 10. There are a couple of little things I need to do, but for a car that is over 10 years old it's very clean. Cost of Ownership- When I bought the car I knew I would have to put some money on top of what I paid for it. So far nothing unusual. It needed new brakes, Rea Sway Bar work, and some new lower ball joins. I have to point out that this rig has 122K on it, so over all not bad. Just normal wear and needing to replace a few things. Main thing is the eninge and transmission is still in tip top shape, running and idling like new. Cost of Ownership- I just got it, but I can allready say that gas milleage isn't that great. Maybe 14-15 city, around 20 hwy. Then again it's an SUV and a heavy rig to boot. So I didn't buy the rig expecting to get 20-30 mpg. Fun Factor- Car is awesome to drive. It handles well for city driving as long as you don't treat it like a wannabe race car, and I can't wait to see how it does with a bit of off roading when I stiffin up the suspension, and chasi next year.
August 26, 2010Enjoyed owning this truck. AWD rocks.
December 23, 2007i think it's a nice vehicle overall. but due to a high profile and narrow stance, it does like to lean on fast turns. it has a decent-sized 4.0 v6 which is pretty good on acceleration for a truck but requires quite a push going up steep hills. the interior has well placed switches and a good display of gauges.
June 25, 2008When I first bought this back in 2006, I purchased it with the intention of it being a short-lived solution for how I could get around until the end of high school. It turned out to be a love affair; throughout the years I have grown to love this Explorer so much that I dread the day where I must get rid of it. Sporting the legendary 5.0 liter V8, my Explorer, while not especially fast, does exhibit the typical torque grunt of an eight cylinder engine. The build quality I have found is not typical of what most people think of when they think Explorer; it has held up superbly over the years, even during my abusive teen phase. The best thing about it? Its great to drive. The steering is light and uncommunicative, the brakes suck, the drivetrain is coarse and jittery. But I don't care. I love driving my Explorer.
September 3, 2010I've had the pleasure of driving this vehicle for the past 2 years, and while it doesn't accelerate very fast or set new speed records, it handles quite well and carries a whole lot of stuff. A lot of people hate the Explorer, and I can't see why. It's a great car for the money, and very reliable.
April 27, 2008Not pretty, not fast, but oh so handy. We used this car asa hauler, a hotel and a people carrier.
April 25, 2008Not a problem with it other than seat degradation.
March 31, 2008I'm a tall guy and I fit in this truck better than any other suv of similar size, seats are comfy, easy to drive, simple gauge cluster, and I can see just about every where, no big blind spots.
January 7, 2008Repairs-invested some money into it, but it's good to go and has been very reliable! It's a fun, comfortable, safe, spacious car to drive! I need to downsize to a small car soon and will defiantly miss it, don't want to sell it!
March 14, 2011I love this car, I got it for removing my tongue ring and it has been the work horse of the family. It is the most reliable car I've ever owned and it gets me through winter every year. Slowly things are starting to go wrong but nothing that will ever need to be fixed like my cruise control for instance. All in all I love this truck.
March 4, 2008Trims & specs
Base MSRP $35,530 | Seating 6 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 42.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $35,195 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 42.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $23,620 | Seating 4 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 32.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $21,790 | Seating 4 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 32.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $24,745 | Seating 6 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 42.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $33,245 | Seating 6 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 42.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $26,750 | Seating 6 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 42.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $31,595 | Seating 6 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 42.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $26,750 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 42.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $31,255 | Seating 5 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 42.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $22,010 | Seating 6 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 42.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $20,610 | Seating 4 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 32.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $29,590 | Seating 6 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 42.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $23,930 | Seating 6 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 42.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP $22,575 | Seating 4 |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity 32.6 cu ft |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |






