Have you driven a 1992 Chevrolet S-10?  

User Reviews

View reviews where users commented on categories.

Clear selections

Displaying 1 - 10 of 1992 Chevrolet S-10 10 reviews.

1992 Chevrolet S-10 Tahoe LB RWDReview
SWLR55 writes:
Cargo Capacity:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Towing:
Overall:

Solid High School Truck — I'm in high school it was really cheap and got me to work and school everyday. It started in sub zero temperatures and in extreme heat. The truck uses a lot of oil but thats because its an old truck.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: Small, quick truck

Cons: not a lot of power

5 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Chevrolet S-10 RWDReview
madmopar writes:
Cargo Capacity:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Towing:
Overall:

92 S-10 — i bought this truck new in 92. it was a great little truck. it got about 25mpg with the 4cyl and 5speed. handling was pretty good, 5speed shifter very easy to shift. good little run-around vehicle with decent cargo capacity.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: good fuel economy

Cons: 4cyl not very powerful

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Chevrolet S-10 RWDReview
Tim writes:
Cargo Capacity:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Towing:
Overall:

The Beast — 1992 S10 350ci V8, 2WD, 4sp automatic shift kit. Estimated 220hp, no clue on torque but its a monster (breaks loose in 3rd gear at 45mph). Absolute blast to drive besides the fact that it is slammed so every little bump radiates through the dash board!!!

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: Its a very light truck with a small block V8....need I say more?

Cons: Minor electrical issues.

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Chevrolet S-10 RWDReview
Sean writes:
Cargo Capacity:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Towing:
Overall:

Great Dependable Winter Truck — I thoroughly enjoyed this vehicle. b ought it for nearly nothing and it lasted me for a long time and never left me stranded. I was able to use this truck for anything that needed a truck for with no problems.

Primary Use: Utility (towing boats, transporting cargo, etc.)

Pros: this car was there for me everytime that I needed it

Cons: the rust

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Chevrolet S-10 Extended Cab RWDReview
Adam writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Reliable And Rusty:) — love the s-10 line of trucks. I am on my second one and though a little primitive, they have excellent power and are relativley problem free, on top of being cheap to fix. The 4.3 liter V6 is one of GM's best motors and is still in use to this day

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: 4.3 liter V6 kicks some booty!!

Cons: GM truck bodies in the earlyh 1990's sucked major donkey balls so my truck is pretty rusty.

4 of 4 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Chevrolet S-10 RWDReview
Dustin writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Stroked 92 Chevy S-10 — 383 storker 468hp, All new bushings and shocks front and rear, So far i have bout 6 grand in the truck total, It gets bout 7 miles to the gallon, This truck is a blast to drive, So far i have not needed to repair it and no rattles thank god

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: The power

Cons: The gas mileage

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Chevrolet S-10 RWDReview
Robby writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

It Runs — it runs well and is pretty easy to fix. looks kinda crappy but hey it's an old truck. it gets 25 MPG highway and maintainance is relatively cheap. it's a stick and has rear wheel drive so I can drift with it.

Pros: it runs

Cons: it doesn't run

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1992 Chevrolet S-10 Extended Cab 4WDReview
Matthew writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

You Love It Or You Don't —

For a 92 small pickup, its a decent truck. It is pretty solid, and can pull a lot more than I thought... its a little too light for serious pulling, it will spin and its hard to stop a load especially on gravel. Its has some decent torque as well. Personally, I really like the way it handles. I have drove some Rangers, and they feel very unresponsicve if you're wipping them around a corner. The s10, you can feel it in the wheel. Thats just my opinion. Mileage isn't great. I recently converted to an electric fan, and thats helped a bit. Maintence can really be a pain because everything is so tightly pack in. I always have to remove something or another to get at the problem. Age and MN roads will take their toll in the common areas, like the rear corners of the cab and work forward. Appearance, thats all in the eyes of you. Owners of them usually love them, other people are wonderin why you drive something like that. The look has grown on me foresure. I have always liked a truck with a street stance, and its not common to have that with a 4x4, and in rural MN 4x4 is a must. Fun factor, a little personalization, like a aftermarket muffler to give it a moddest zone, and any other mods to style it for you... and it can't be a fun little truck to cruise in. It also doesn't have cut out, so if you wanna get it up to 115 mph, go for it. Yes it will, atleast mine has...

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: Affordable, best of all worlds of small trucks

Cons: Rust, Maintence

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Chevrolet S-10 RWDReview
Kit writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

S-10 Toy — Great little truck. Faster than stock mustang gt's & Camaro's of the same time. Built like a rock. Bumper was dented from running into trees/rocks/hills, but frame was solid. Fun as hell. Cheap. would buy one again as a toy. But like i said, it was small. NOT a family man's truck.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: FUN

Cons: small

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1992 Chevrolet S-10 RWDReview
Garren writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Beginner — Good beginner car.. It is a nice lookin truck. Very slow tho. Dont expect to go any wehre fast. Owner ship was good not much to maintain or anything. Fun to drive if you have five speed manual. And 4.3 vortec

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: cheap

Cons: slow

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Displaying 1 - 10 of 1992 Chevrolet S-10 10 reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2004 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews

Review By Judith A.

Decided to wait. Selection in my commute area were limited. Read More

Great Overall Truck By Cakana

I got this truck for a daily driver and for the snow. It drives great and handles very good in the snow. Only things bad are the size of the truck bed and it eats through gas with its V6 engine. Read More

2003 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews

Review By david

could like forest hunters green have if 6 speed manual lower price and mileage with brown likeness in leather interior mush white paint and payment plain note or smaller white ram 2 door same as ta... Read More

Review By dwhisenhunt1016

Excellent good price nice pricegood looking truckexcellent value good gas mileage Read More

2002 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews

Review By Sharon

too many miler for my wishes or wants for purchase Read More

02 Huntin/fishin Truck By cannonguy

I'm very pleased with this as a Wi truck and would recommend this to anyone looking for an inexpensive yet reliable truck. Not for the Baja circuit but suits me just fine for the tank trails of FT McC... Read More

2001 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews

Review By Guru9YK3L8

I wanted a S-10 4WD used model 2001 or better. This fit the price I wanted. I was looking for price not run ability any repairs done my way by me. Read More

Review By Bo

I didnt view this vehicle but Ive had a few 2001 Chevy S-10s and I absolutely love them for what their built for.. daily drivers or throw some 20-22s on them custom stereo,or even a snug top when trav... Read More

2000 Chevrolet S-10 Reviews

Review By Richard

Not bad looking. But I like S10s especially Chevy Read More

Review By Richard

Very slow 118hp engine. I had to upshift to go up a medium hill Read More

S-10

Looking for a Used S-10 in your area?

CarGurus has 244 nationwide S-10 listings starting at $1,999.

ZIP:
Have you driven a 1992 Chevrolet S-10?