1969 Plymouth Road Runner User Reviews

1969 Plymouth Road Runner Top Comparisons

Users ranked 1969 Plymouth Road Runner against other cars which they drove/owned. Each ranking was based on 9 categories. Here is the summary of top rankings.

1969 Plymouth Road Runner vs:

    Have you driven a 1969 Plymouth Road Runner?  
    Rank This Car

    User Reviews

    View reviews where users commented on categories.

    Clear selections

    Displaying all 10 1969 Plymouth Road Runner reviews.

    1969 Plymouth Road Runner Review
    says:
    5
    Roadrunner cartoon birds and beep,beep horn give this one lots of appeal. large production numbers make it easier to find and buy.
    Power Ranked 1969 Dodge Super Bee better.
    "Both are equal."
    Handling Ranked 1969 Dodge Super Bee better.
    "Both are equal."
    Looks/Style Ranked 1969 Dodge Super Bee better.
    "More aggressive styling."
    Front Seats Ranked 1969 Dodge Super Bee better.
    "Both are equal."
    Back Seats Ranked 1969 Dodge Super Bee better.
    "Both have sofa sized back seats."
    Cargo Capacity Ranked 1969 Dodge Super Bee better.
    "Both have massive trunks."
    Family Car Ranked 1969 Dodge Super Bee better.
    "Both have huge cabins and cavernous trunks."
    Value Ranked 1969 Dodge Super Bee better.
    "Lower production numbers."
    Would Buy Ranked 1969 Dodge Super Bee better.
    "Lower production numbers. More aggressive styling."
    1969 Plymouth Road Runner Review
    says:
    I owned a total of four (4) Road Runners in my life. I enjoyed them all. My first one was a share car between my mother and me. It was a B5 blue 383 automatic with 3:23 gears. Bench seat. An aftermarket A/C was add later. I relinquished my half to her when I purchased a Dodge Charger 500 Hemi. It was Forest Green. When I found the second Road Runner I fell hard. It was a 1969 1/2 440 six pack with the glasshood. 4 speed transmission and 4:10 Dana rearend. It was also B5 blue with bench seats. I kept both of these car until I joined the Air Force in 1972. At the time I had these two cars my Wife had a loaded Dodge Super Bee. It also was B5 blue. I bought the third Roadrunner used in 1975 after returning from my 2nd tour to S.E.A. it had a custom paint job of Silver, Red, and maroon. It was a 383 automatic with a black interior. I drove it for two years before I was sent to Europe. The four one was a field find. I purchased it for $400 in 1982 and never completed it. I sold it running to a nice young man. And lost track of what happened with it. I enjoyed all my Mopar cars greatly and to drive a 1969 Roadrunner is on my bucket list.
    Looks/Style Ranked 1969 Dodge Charger better.
    "It did not share its body style with any other Chrysler. I was unique."
    Back Seats Ranked 1969 Dodge Charger worse.
    "They were comfortable and they were where my first child was conceived."
    1969 Plymouth Road Runner Review
    Back Seats:
    Cargo Capacity:
    Family Car:
    Fuel Economy:
    Front Seats:
    Handling:
    Maintenance Cost:
    Price:
    Power:
    Reliability:
    Looks/Style:
    Overall:
    35

    69 Beep Beep — The car has a radio however, the music that the 440 make is all the radio I need. This car has the Trac-Pak which makes highway driving a little difficult. Other than that and the drum brakes she's a beaut.

    Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

    Pros: Everything.......Basically ownership.

    Cons: Drum Brakes and gas mileage.

    1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
    Is this helpful? Yes | No
    1969 Plymouth Road Runner Review
    Cargo Capacity:
    Family Car:
    Fuel Economy:
    Front Seats:
    Handling:
    Maintenance Cost:
    Price:
    Power:
    Reliability:
    Looks/Style:
    Overall:
    45

    The Good The Bad And The Ugly — fast exiting fun terrible and good looking. the 69 is the bomb. yes the roadrunner is faster then most muscle cars but lacks that proper feel. for me the road runner is one of he best but its costly and corners like a pig

    Pros: speed

    Cons: handling

    2 of 3 people found this review helpful.
    Is this helpful? Yes | No
    1969 Plymouth Road Runner Review
    Appearance:
    Performance:
    Quality:
    Overall:
    65

    The Roadrunner. — Big car, not very aerodynamic, plenty of torque. Spacious interior, enough to hold 6 people. Expensive on gas, to power a high performance 383cu engine. It was a good and fun car to drive. The name says it all....very fast

    Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

    Pros: Performance

    Cons: HARD ON GAS

    4 of 5 people found this review helpful.
    Is this helpful? Yes | No
    1969 Plymouth Road Runner Review
    Appearance:
    Performance:
    Quality:
    Overall:
    55

    1969 Road Runner — 1969 Plymouth Road Runner / B5 Blue / 383 - 4 speed / 8.75 Rear - 4.11 Ratio What can I say? The car definitely speaks for itself. It's a hell of a muscle car. Nothing sounds like a Mopar Big Block. Mine's got a 383 4bbl.

    Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

    Pros: Everything

    Cons: Nothing

    1 of 2 people found this review helpful.
    Is this helpful? Yes | No
    1969 Plymouth Road Runner Review
    Appearance:
    Performance:
    Quality:
    Overall:
    35

    1969-1/2 Plymouth Road Runner — 1969-1/2 Plymouth Road Runner, 440, 6 BBL, 4-speed, 4:10 Dana rear, Fiberglass Lift-off Hood. Black 15X6 H.D. wheels, No hub caps. Original R4 Performance Red. Very rare, released Spring of 1969. Dodge had their version in the Six Pack Super Bee.

    Pros: Lots of Horses

    Cons: Nothing really

    Is this review helpful? Yes | No
    1969 Plymouth Road Runner Review
    Appearance:
    Performance:
    Quality:
    Overall:
    35

    A Roadrunner Used To Be My Dream Car — It is a great care with alot of power. Mine has a 440 and I love the 4-speed.

    Pros: There is alot of power and it is a fun car to drive!

    Cons: Very heavy vehicle and not the best with sharp corners.

    1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
    Is this helpful? Yes | No
    1969 Plymouth Road Runner Review
    Appearance:
    Performance:
    Quality:
    Overall:
    45

    69 Plymouth Road Runner — huge 7.2 litre v8, triple holley carburettas ( 6 pack) lots of torque and horsepower. amazing acceleration, does not handle very good round corners fantastic for drag racing. brakes are rubbish, soon to be uprated. the huge engine causes alot of vibration and rattles, interior pretty basic but does the job, exterior looks like a proper muscle car, sleak n sporty. cost of ownership is very expensive, average 10mpg and parts expensive and hard to find. amazing experience to drive, driving a muscle car is an opportunity that must be taken by everyone.

    Pros: amazing power and acceleration, great muscle car image and motoring history

    Cons: dated brakes, terrible fuel economy, hard to source parts

    1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
    Is this helpful? Yes | No
    1969 Plymouth Road Runner Review
    Appearance:
    Performance:
    Quality:
    Overall:
    55

    Going To Be Awesome! — It runs and drives. Added plus...It's LOUD!!! This car has a 383 under the hood. Used to be a drag car, now being restored back to original form. Has manual transmission, but will be back to automatic.

    Pros: Runs, Drives, and is LOUD!

    Cons: Not restored.

    1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
    Is this helpful? Yes | No

    Displaying all 10 1969 Plymouth Road Runner reviews.

    Reviews From Other Years

    1980 Plymouth Road Runner Reviews

    Pro Street Road Runner By Steve1180

    340 stroker with 2 stages of nitrous... runs mid 9's on bottle and 10.60's on motor. Fully streetable and daily driven... Read More

    1977 Plymouth Road Runner Reviews

    Beep Beep By Paul

    when restored be a beautiful car.. fun to drive only 318 4 bbl so not a real powerhouse but respectable. insurance really cheap summer driver only and not to work. good solid car. brings me memorie... Read More

    1975 Plymouth Road Runner Reviews

    Good-bad Car By Joe

    Thi car was a car that wasn't fr looks or performane really just a car to play around with and learn some new things on. Overall a good car a rare find only madeone year hard to fndwith sun roof. Read More

    1973 Plymouth Road Runner Reviews

    Mopar By Scott

    when i could keep it running it was a fun car. electrical nightmare sold it to a friend of mines dad he was much more mellow then me about working on it. it was a solid car red with white interior Read More

    Great Car We Just Need To Get The Larger Moter In It. By Kevin

    This is one of the classic american cars that has that muscle look/feel but isnt the same car your neighbor has. This is a fairly rare car but great performance and fun to drive. Ours only has a 318 i... Read More

    1972 Plymouth Road Runner Reviews

    Its Mine And I Love It By Dustin

    400 big block, 6 mpg, 3rd owner when dad sign title over, 0-150 speedomitor, tack on hood, was supposed to be a 440 but a serial number got switched, bench seat, hemi orange- had bucket seats in it. r... Read More

    It Goes Beep Beep While Leaving Anything In It's Dust By Matt

    As far as old muscle cars go, this car is a performance and luxury king. It has a 340 c.i. V8 that will torch the tires. The looks are second to none and the interior feels very luxurious. The ... Read More

    Cars compared to 1969 Plymouth Road RunnerPeople researching a 1969 Plymouth Road Runner contacted a dealer about

    Road Runner

    Looking for a Used Road Runner in your area?

    CarGurus has 42 nationwide Road Runner listings and the tools to find you a great deal.

    ZIP:
    Have you driven a 1969 Plymouth Road Runner?  
    Rank Your Car →