1996 Suzuki Esteem Reviews, Pricing & Specs
Write a reviewOur experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
User reviews for 1996 Suzuki Esteem
Write a reviewUser rating:
by Reuben J
Feb 07, 2010
excellent for daily commuting, and good for short distances,
good performance for the price, and weighs only 950 odd
kilos. very easy to drive, easy on the money, interiors are
boring, quality of plastics are bad, and switches are not good
enoughFeb 07, 2010
by Anonymous
Dec 10, 2009
Performance=not too good underpowered
build quality=very reliable
appearance=pleasing to the eye
cost of ownership=low
fun factor=6 out of 10
go in for it if budjets are low and milage is the requirement..go for itDec 10, 2009
by Anonymous
Jun 30, 2009
I find it sometimes unnecessarily complicated for service of
some of the typical home mechanical repairs. Oil changes
are easy enough, changing the passenger side headlight is a
1/2 day adventure since so many pieces of the airbox behind
it must be removed. It is the 1.6 liter 1996 with auto trans
not quick off the line at all I find it could not even get out of
its own way. Build quality as I mentioned as of service the
things that break are things you never expect to-window
cranks, heater control buttons that fall off. Appearance,
looks like a Honda or any small mid '90's car. I expected
better milage, my Corolla gives me 48mpg HWY and 28 CTY
and this is about 38 HWY and 25 CTY. Fun Factor - ZERO.
Parts are hard to come by. If I had to do over I would have
kept my old Tercel.Jun 30, 2009
User rating:
by Reuben J
Feb 07, 2010
excellent for daily commuting, and good for short distances,
good performance for the price, and weighs only 950 odd
kilos. very easy to drive, easy on the money, interiors are
boring, quality of plastics are bad, and switches are not good
enoughFeb 07, 2010
by Anonymous
Dec 10, 2009
Performance=not too good underpowered
build quality=very reliable
appearance=pleasing to the eye
cost of ownership=low
fun factor=6 out of 10
go in for it if budjets are low and milage is the requirement..go for itDec 10, 2009
by Anonymous
Jun 30, 2009
I find it sometimes unnecessarily complicated for service of
some of the typical home mechanical repairs. Oil changes
are easy enough, changing the passenger side headlight is a
1/2 day adventure since so many pieces of the airbox behind
it must be removed. It is the 1.6 liter 1996 with auto trans
not quick off the line at all I find it could not even get out of
its own way. Build quality as I mentioned as of service the
things that break are things you never expect to-window
cranks, heater control buttons that fall off. Appearance,
looks like a Honda or any small mid '90's car. I expected
better milage, my Corolla gives me 48mpg HWY and 28 CTY
and this is about 38 HWY and 25 CTY. Fun Factor - ZERO.
Parts are hard to come by. If I had to do over I would have
kept my old Tercel.Jun 30, 2009
by Jonathan Y
Nov 05, 2007
1996 Suzuki Baleno (as it was known locally) 1.8l 3dr Hatch, nice drive, nothing fancy, I always felt I should have gone for the Suzuki GTi instead.Nov 05, 2007
What users have asked
No questions found.Have a question?
Top Comparisons
Have you driven a 1996 Suzuki Esteem?Compare this car
1996 Suzuki Esteem Pricing
Original MSRP
$11,989 to $13,289Price range
N/AAverage price on CG
N/AYoY price change
N/ATrims & specs
Airbags
Dual front airbags
Audio System
AM/FM radio
Convenience Features
Multi-function remote: trunk release
Seats
Front seat type: bucket · Upholstery: cloth
Windows
Front wipers: intermittent
Airbags
Dual front airbags
Audio System
AM/FM radio
Brakes
ABS: 4-wheel
Convenience Features
Multi-function remote: trunk release
Mirrors
Exterior mirrors: power
Seats
Front seat type: bucket · Upholstery: cloth
Windows
Front wipers: intermittent