1992 Saturn S-Series Reviews, Pricing & Specs
Overview
Saturn decided to keep things simple as it updated the Saturn S-Series for 1992. Noteworthy changes included a new mounting system for the...
Saturn decided to keep things simple as it updated the Saturn S-Series for 1992. Noteworthy changes included a new mounting system for the engine and transmission to cut down on noise, redesigned wheels, revised seat belts and climate control, and extra insulation for the passenger compartments. In addition the SC and SL2 trims received new 135 mph odometers. Saturn also added leather seat upholstery as an option. Otherwise, everything remained the same. The SL, SL1, SL2, and SC represent the 4 trims. In addition, the 4 trims still come in 2 general tiers, with the SL and SL1 using a 1.9 L, 85 hp 4 cylinder engine while the SL2 and SC have a 1.9 L, 124 hp engine. The trims retain their general dimensions and standard features, including AM/FM audio, power brakes, and remote trunk release. The SL and SL1 give you the best gas mileage with figures ranging from 28 mpg in city, 38 mpg on the highway in manual to 26 mpg in the city, 35 on the highway in automatic. Air conditioning comes as an option in all trims. Overall, reviewers appreciate the '92 S-Series' durability. Individuals have put up to 250,000 miles on their cars and report few serious problems. While aesthetics could stand some improvement, the low price tag made this model appealing to just about anyone on a budget. If you don't mind some of the outdated features, plan to pick up your used model as soon as you can before it becomes a true relic.
What owners say
"Overall, owners of the 1992 Saturn S-Series appreciate its dependability, fuel efficiency, and fun driving experience. They love the low maintenance costs and good handling, especially around corners. However, many drivers mention issues with aging, build quality, and the appearance of the car, noting problems with rust and outdated interior styling."
doesnt look that great because the previous owner mucked it up. performance is ok. its not super fast or anything, come on, its got less than 200hp. handles beautifully (for FWD) and can really carve some corners. and it is TONS of fun to drive just put in a new motor (along with a fidanza flywheel/exedy clutch combo), no thanks to chris, since he blew my motor! btw chris, since you didnt pay for the motor, you get to help in my next project build. oh yeah, its got a couple of grand in mods, nothing super crazy though. some are: custom HKS Ti exhaust (cat back), EBC/Brembo brake setup, KYB struts/Sprint springs, custom CNC machined strut tower bars(fully adjustable), MSD ignition, AEM/HKS induction, and so on..
January 4, 2009Performance- can do 2 wheel burn out, have beaten v8s, handling is not the best its very front heavey Build Quality- due to poor design its rusting out bad Appearance- Sporty for a 4 door and not over complicated COA- $300 3 years ago and about $500-$1000 every year Fun- 5 speed tire burning fun
August 24, 2009The car is very compact and does not require much gas. It has a large trunk and plenty of leg room. Overall, it is a great little car!
July 25, 2007What owners say
doesnt look that great because the previous owner mucked it up. performance is ok. its not super fast or anything, come on, its got less than 200hp. handles beautifully (for FWD) and can really carve some corners. and it is TONS of fun to drive just put in a new motor (along with a fidanza flywheel/exedy clutch combo), no thanks to chris, since he blew my motor! btw chris, since you didnt pay for the motor, you get to help in my next project build. oh yeah, its got a couple of grand in mods, nothing super crazy though. some are: custom HKS Ti exhaust (cat back), EBC/Brembo brake setup, KYB struts/Sprint springs, custom CNC machined strut tower bars(fully adjustable), MSD ignition, AEM/HKS induction, and so on..
January 4, 2009Performance- can do 2 wheel burn out, have beaten v8s, handling is not the best its very front heavey Build Quality- due to poor design its rusting out bad Appearance- Sporty for a 4 door and not over complicated COA- $300 3 years ago and about $500-$1000 every year Fun- 5 speed tire burning fun
August 24, 2009The car is very compact and does not require much gas. It has a large trunk and plenty of leg room. Overall, it is a great little car!
July 25, 2007Preformance wise the car has a solid feel at the wheel. It accelerates quickly, brakes were good, but were replaced with new ones. Handling was all there where you point the wheel the car went. It needed a lot of repairs, but that comes with older cars. Never had any other problems. The car for its year was a a good look for it, interior was clean and comfy. Amazing on gas mainance was easy could do it your self. The car was fun to drive and you could take it any where. For a family sedan, the car was great.
December 1, 2008Is this car fun to drive? yes! Cost of ownership? really low, you can save a lot on gas, maintenance, and more on this car. Interior styling looks could be a little better, but older saturns are known for their plastic body parts. Acceleration is good, braking is great and handling is wonderful. !!!
November 18, 2009it was a good car it could hit 120 but i thorw a rod and a pistion on the highway and put a big i mean big hole in the side of the block you could fit 3 fist in the hole lol it was bad but it was a fun car to drive
April 11, 2008I like the style and the fact that Honda civic Rims fit perfectly, also very easy to work on for me. i dislike that they stopped making it and parts for it so most of my hard to find parts come from the mourge.
May 21, 2012The car was small and had a small gas tank. Easy to chuck around corners, hard to drift. Exterior had lots of dents, while the interior was very ugly.
March 6, 2008it is a good car, good gas milage, but it aged quickly, i've had to put alot of money into fixing random things. and the brakes always have something wrong with them. it is a very fun car to drive though, it is almost impossible to roll even going sideways down a gravel road at 70 mph
December 10, 2009its pretty quick for a saturn it probly helps that the car is made outta plastic also ha. i payed 200 bucks for the car it just needed a motor its not bad car it gets 30mpg, good trunk space.
July 24, 2010
