Used 2010 Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring for SaleNationwide
Shop with transparent pricing.
Only show listings that include dealer fees- Year:
- 2010
- Make:
- Mazda
- Model:
- CX-9
- Body type:
- SUV / Crossover
- Doors:
- 4 doors
- Drivetrain:
- Front-Wheel Drive
- Engine:
- 273 hp 3.7L V6
- Exterior color:
- Brilliant Black Clearcoat
- Combined gas mileage:
- 19 MPG
- Fuel type:
- Gasoline
- Interior color:
- Sand
- Transmission:
- 6-Speed Automatic
- Mileage:
- 233,971
- Stock #:
- B00008
- VIN:
- JM3TB2MAXA0221698
2010 Mazda CX-9
Grand Touring
233,971 mi
$3,800
- Year:
- 2010
- Make:
- Mazda
- Model:
- CX-9
- Body type:
- SUV / Crossover
- Doors:
- 4 doors
- Drivetrain:
- Front-Wheel Drive
- Engine:
- 273 hp 3.7L V6
- Exterior color:
- White
- Combined gas mileage:
- 19 MPG
- Fuel type:
- Gasoline
- Interior color:
- Brown (Tan)
- Transmission:
- Automatic
- Mileage:
- 125,035
- Stock #:
- 3358O
- VIN:
- JM3TB2MV4A0235776
2010 Mazda CX-9
Grand Touring
125,035 mi
$9,598
- Year:
- 2010
- Make:
- Mazda
- Model:
- CX-9
- Body type:
- SUV / Crossover
- Doors:
- 4 doors
- Drivetrain:
- Front-Wheel Drive
- Engine:
- 273 hp 3.7L V6
- Exterior color:
- Gray
- Combined gas mileage:
- 19 MPG
- Fuel type:
- Gasoline
- Interior color:
- Black
- Transmission:
- 6-Speed Automatic
- Mileage:
- 145,701
- Stock #:
- 5567
- VIN:
- JM3TB2MA5A0233449
2010 Mazda CX-9
Grand Touring
145,701 mi
$5,298
- Year:
- 2010
- Make:
- Mazda
- Model:
- CX-9
- Body type:
- SUV / Crossover
- Doors:
- 4 doors
- Drivetrain:
- Front-Wheel Drive
- Engine:
- 273 hp 3.7L V6
- Exterior color:
- Gray
- Combined gas mileage:
- 19 MPG
- Fuel type:
- Gasoline
- Interior color:
- Gray
- Transmission:
- 6-Speed Automatic
- Mileage:
- 109,568
- Stock #:
- 7583C
- VIN:
- JM3TB2MA0A0207583
2010 Mazda CX-9
Grand Touring
109,568 mi
$6,598
- Year:
- 2010
- Make:
- Mazda
- Model:
- CX-9
- Body type:
- SUV / Crossover
- Doors:
- 4 doors
- Drivetrain:
- Front-Wheel Drive
- Engine:
- 273 hp 3.7L V6
- Exterior color:
- Black
- Fuel type:
- Gasoline
- Interior color:
- No Color
- Transmission:
- 6-Speed Automatic Overdrive
- Mileage:
- 131,784
- Stock #:
- 16432
- VIN:
- JM3TB2MA3A0220358
Preparing for a close up...
Photos coming soon
2010 Mazda CX-9
Grand Touring
131,784 mi
$8,823
- Year:
- 2010
- Make:
- Mazda
- Model:
- CX-9
- Body type:
- SUV / Crossover
- Doors:
- 4 doors
- Drivetrain:
- Front-Wheel Drive
- Engine:
- 273 hp 3.7L V6
- Exterior color:
- Blue
- Fuel type:
- Gasoline
- Transmission:
- 6-Speed Automatic Overdrive
- Mileage:
- 197,410
- Stock #:
- 945
- VIN:
- JM3TB2MV5A0230019
2010 Mazda CX-9
Grand Touring
197,410 mi
$5,888
There are no more results from the filters selected.
Check out these similar matches for you.
Fetching additional listings...
5.0 Overall rating
Filter by rating
James T
Reviewed a 2010 Mazda Grand Touring on Aug 2, 2012
Acceleration: Okay, due to the size of the vehicle Braking: great Handling: great Build Quality: No repairs so far, maintenance cost is low. Appearance: Great exterior, ok interior (but it's not a luxury vehicle) Cost of ownership: Good mileage on highway, local is quite horrible. Fun to drive!!!
FAQs
How much does the Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring cost?
How many Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring vehicles have no reported accidents or damage?
What is the fuel economy of the Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring?
What fuel types are available?
Relevant articles
The Best Used Midsize SUVs in 2026
Family-friendly SUVs are more expensive than ever, but you can still find good deals if you know where to look. Here, we’ve got used midsize SUV recommendations at four price points under $40,000.
Who Makes Mazda Cars?
Mazda is a Japanese automaker that sells a lineup of cars and SUVs. Though not technically a luxury brand, many Mazda vehicles punch well above their weight and offer premium interiors and athletic driving dynamics to rival that of some luxury cars.
2022 Toyota Highlander vs 2022 Mazda CX-9: Three-Row Crossovers Compared
The 2022 Toyota Highlander and the 2022 Mazda CX-9 are both three-row crossovers, but these popular models have a few distinguishing features. We compare the two, from design to performance and from practicality to cost-effectiveness, to determine which one is the better buy.
