|
LesAlbin writes:
2011 Volvo XC60 3.2 Review
ProsNice looks and good handling for an SUV. Plenty of room. Quiet and relatively smooth ride. Good turning radius. ConsFuel economy is good for an SUV, but it is still an SUV. 
75
Excellent All Round Suv — Compared Kia, Subaru, Audi, and MB before buying the Volvo. CX60 had the best combination of quality, price, and performance of any we saw. Zero maintenance costs have been nice and there has been no reason to take it back for anything other than routine service. Handling, braking, and acceleration are more than adequate. Interior and exterior are attractive design, material quality is excellent, and workmanship is at least as good as any other, better than most. Very comfortable and feels safe under pretty much all conditions. Primary Use: Family transportation
| ||
|
WL27 writes:
2011 Volvo XC60 T6 Review
Pros~18-19mi to the gallon in mostly city (suburban) driving ~30%+ better than our XC90. ConsOff-black interior gets really hot in the summer. 
25
Has Been Good To Me So Far... — Did a lot of research (Highlander, Enclave, as well as American-brand crossovers) and when it came down to it, I was deciding between the XC60 vs. the Audi Q5. Liked both in terms of options, luxury & price vs the others in the class. Was on the lookout for a pre-owned Q5 2.0 given the reviews that said it was more fuel efficient than the 3.2 but couldn't find one in my desired timeframe. Car feels very solid and safe when driving. It has good to great acceleration when getting on the highway, but I don't really use the T6 engine to its full capability as I prioritize fuel efficiency. Primary Use: Family transportation |
