Average Ratings from 18 reviews
- Performance:
- Appearance:
- Build Quality:
- Overall:
Review Highlights Click to filter reviews below
|
Kenneth writes:
2002 Land Rover Freelander Review
Proscomfort & ellegance Consnot a great deal of boot space
45
My Car — this vehicle drives well it also looks good. the seats are very comfortable and supports the back well,the roof bar idea is an excellent one,with the electric windows,cruise control and air con it is luxury on wheels,its 2.5 v6 engine is powerful but very quiet and efficient
| ||
|
Charlotte writes:
2002 Land Rover Freelander 4 Dr S AWD SUV Review
ProsIf you want a pretty suv that will do a little bit of non serious offroading and towing then it has to be the freddy! ConsGo for the diesel unless u like checking oil and water every couple days.
35
Cool Wee Beastie Thats Also Good For Rougher Work. — Its the 1.8i model and accelerates really well. For a landy the build quality aint bad but the interioir cud do wiv a few screws tightening. Like the look of it but nowhere near as nice as a disco or 90. Nae bad on fuel for wot it is apx 30mpg. Loads of fun to drive and will evem get me out of muddy fields when i ask it too. Primary Use: Commuting to work | ||
|
Rob writes:
2002 Land Rover Freelander Review
ProsBest car I've Had and i've had some... ConsNo Heated Fron Screen like the TD4 versions have
45
My Freelander — MPG returs are pritty good for a permanent 4wd normal use im getting between 37 to 40 mpg obvisly depends if im towing. Best i've had was 44.5 Run down to Poole. With 3 adults and cases. And the Air con on (its on all the time actually by choice).. engine is 2lt Tubo Diesel the Rover engine not the BMW TD4 version Primary Use: Utility (towing boats, transporting cargo, etc.) | ||
|
Salvador writes:
2002 Land Rover Freelander 4 Dr SE AWD SUV Review
ProsExotic Consconfort =/
25
Electric Sunroof — Good acceleration, good handling Good plastics, good appearence low cost, so funny to drive, excelent performance, middle confort, good 4wd performance, confortable seats, versatility and high capacity to be viewed by all, well xD xD xD xD xD xD xD Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) | ||
|
Kashif writes:
2002 Land Rover Freelander 4 Dr S AWD SUV Review
ProsIt is fun, fast, and best off roading car ConsToo expensive, too much engine and electrical work, and shock replacement!!
25
Beautiful, See It As It Goes, And Expensive — The performance of this car is nice with a little supercharger built into it. The handling of this car is outstanding. The build quality is strong and put together well and. The car is okay in the interior nothing special. The cost of this car would be about $20-$35 to fill up the tank and about $50.00 for maintenance. But if you want to take it to the dealer then it goes from $50.00 to at least $200.00. The fun factor of this car is it goes off-road and also that it is prietty fast. The whole car costs about $6000-15000. Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) | ||
|
Jayy writes:
2002 Land Rover Freelander Review
ProsWell built ConsThe performance
35
Land Rover Freelander — The acceleration, braking, handling are all good points in a freelander. The build quality well it is well made. The appearance the interior is nicer than the exterior but you might like it the other way round i enjoy diving this car. Primary Use: Commuting to work | ||
|
Sergio writes:
2002 Land Rover Freelander 4 Dr SE AWD SUV Review
Prosdevelop driving skills Consrepairs
25
....looks... — good offroad performance, nice torque and what we in spanish call pique. long brakes and not so good handling. Build quality, no so good for the mid latitudes, bad gas pump. squeaks, sevral since it has many removable parts. great loooks, everyone has to do with this car on the streets the interior and exterior design are on the otp of sports suv's expensive car, though it doesn't consume much gasoline to be a good 4x4 at offroad conditions. fun factor..... it's a show off... Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) | ||
|
Andrea writes:
2002 Land Rover Freelander 4 Dr SE AWD SUV Review
Prosfun, pretty, AWD ConsEXPENSIVE
35
I Love Her — It's a great car - love it, but very expensive to fix if anything goes wrong with it - I'm torn between getting something else & just driving her until she just won't go any further & hoping it's later rather than sooner. We shall see. Primary Use: Family transportation | ||
|
Neil writes:
2002 Land Rover Freelander Review
ProsGood off-road ConsPoor mechanical build quality
45
Land Rover Freelander Mk1 — This was one of the first Freelanders on the road in June 1998. I had the 3 door 'softback' I had always wanted a land rover and oved owing it but being the first of a new batch it was beset by problems. This combined with the fact that the 'softback' was the most complicated convertible roof i've ever seen meant it was a bit difficult to live with. It was surprisingly good off-road and I tested this on several occasions | ||
|
Chris writes:
2002 Land Rover Freelander 4 Dr HSE AWD SUV Review
Prosgood looks great growl from engine Conssore on fuel expensive to fix
25
|
|
Looking for a Used Freelander in your area?
CarGurus has 173 nationwide Freelander listings
starting at $3,450.
|