1997 Volvo V40 User Reviews

1997 Volvo V40 Review Ratings

  • Review your car

Average Ratings from 1 reviews

  • Performance:4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars 4 / 5
  • Appearance:4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars 4 / 5
  • Build Quality:4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars 4 / 5
  • Overall: 4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars 4 / 5

User Reviews

David writes:
1997 Volvo V40 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
4

Pros

Good to drive, quite spacious, good MPG

Cons

Not as big as looks suggest

375

1997 Volvo V40 — Peformance: Very smooth, reasonably quick. Brakes are good, Handling nice and tight, unexpectedly good. Build Quality: All good. Appearence: Very nice, discreet. Cost of ownership: Good on fuel and cheap to insure Fun Factor: Lots of fun, more so probably because it is better than expected

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
V40
Looking for a Used V40 in your area?
CarGurus has 75 nationwide V40 listings starting at $2,500.
ZIP:
Review your car

Reviews From Other Years

2003 Volvo V40 Reviews

God Car By Martin

a bit slow to accellerate has a smaller turn ratio than my golf II Matinance is easy looks rael nige fuel consumption is 10l pr 100 km cost araund 200 euro pr year to maintain (first year) YES I'S ... Read More

V40 Delight By MacGarver

I bought this car initially for my wife to drive our kids around. However, with the price of gas hitting all time highs, it quickly replaced my SUV and became my daily commuter. I bought it used (a le... Read More

Read all 6 2003 Volvo V40 reviews

2002 Volvo V40 Reviews

Great Car By joshwalter

A really great car that is fund to drive. It is very reliable and rides well. The cost of ownership is low. We've keep thorough records and always used the top oil for maintenance. I highly recomm... Read More

Read all 2002 Volvo V40 reviews

2001 Volvo V40 Reviews

Nice Family Car, Enough Storage For Three, Get The Horrizontal Roof Rack It Helps, By sportfamily1

Lots of turbo lag at low rpms. Confort in driver seat is les than desireable, all the others are perfect. Only seats two adults in back, but what do you expect from a entry level sedan wagon. But once... Read More

What Is That? A Toyota, A Ford? "no, It's A Volvo!" By Andrew

Performance: When tuned up properly and serviced regularly, even tho' it's only a "low pressure" Turbo, it ROCKS! Build Quality: What you would expect from the "entry level" of the Volvo line...it tri... Read More

Read all 9 2001 Volvo V40 reviews

2000 Volvo V40 Reviews

Easy To Drive, Semi Luxurious And A Good Fit For Me. By mikey2me

Nice little wagon with upscale looks and safety features. I think its very distinctive and relatively rare on the road. I also like supporting my Scandinavian heritage. After all, they explored North ... Read More

2000 Volvo V40 4 Dr Turbo Wagon By David

Peformance: Very smooth, reasonably quick. Brakes are good, Handling nice and tight, unexpectedly good. Build Quality: All good. Appearence: Very nice, discreet. Cost of ownership: Good on fuel and ch... Read More

Read all 13 2000 Volvo V40 reviews

1998 Volvo V40 Reviews

Brilliant Car Would Be Reluctant To Sell By Daz

what can i say i love it , she has the lot heated seats , leather , just great .This car is a good all rounder it has all what a family could need and all what a single guy could want , it has the l... Read More

Read all 1998 Volvo V40 reviews

People researching a 1997 Volvo V40 contacted a dealer about

Volvo V70
9% of the time
1997 Volvo V40, The car I drove is not the one in this photo., exterior
Volvo V40
8% of the time
Subaru Forester
7% of the time
BMW 3 Series
6% of the time