Average Ratings from 15 reviews
- Performance:
- Appearance:
- Build Quality:
- Overall:
Review Highlights Click to filter reviews below
|
Lance writes:
1996 Mercedes-Benz C-Class C280 Review
ProsHandling, Midrange, High speed stability, braking power Cons0-60, gas mileage, no anti-knock system (won't tolerate low octane), no steering feedback (good for some, bad for others)
95
Late 90's Compact German Luxury — This was my first mercedes. This isn't a particularly fun car but it does handle very well for what it looks like. Most of this because its german and was designed for constant daily high speed and also accounting for the possibility of emergency maneuvers at its governed speed of 130mph. Acceleration is crap but once it gets up to highway speed the midrange is surprising (191hp). Gas mileage sucked, and it ran bad on anything but premium. the only problem it ever gave me was misfires because of badly worn/aged spark plugs. After new plugs it ran flawlessly at 100+mph with nearly 160k miles on it. The 4 wheel independent suspension in this thing coupled with RWD and traction control make this thing NUMB at 130mph. The steering feels like the car is at a dead stop and it glides from lane to lane even over bumps at those speed like its floating. The brakes are fantastic and will make the needle fall sharply with only a small tap of the foot. I miss this car and might someday buy another, hopefully a C36 or C43, somehow i love this older boxy body-style more than the one that came after it.
| ||
|
Frank writes:
1996 Mercedes-Benz C-Class C280 Review
ProsGood on gas, handles well, comfortable, great trunk capacity, peppy engine, driver friendly, advanced premium sound system ConsTakes high octane gasoline, expensive to maintain, only 2 power down windows :(
85
I Love It — Quietly tuned engine that is good on fuel. High Revolutions add that performance sound and feel that you would expect from a race car. roomy interior and comfortable seats. Fantastic BOSE sound system with BOSE subs. The cars over all appearance shows the great engineering feats made by Mercedes-Benz. The boxy look is classic and is sure to draw attention where ever you go. | ||
|
Heigo writes:
1996 Mercedes-Benz C-Class C220 Review
ProsIts a Mercedes ConsHigh-preassure pump
35
Nice — Sporty, but not as comfort to ride as an e-class. Has loads of power. Looks and feels really new. Great interior design. A bit low. Has oversteer. Fast drive-by. 3rd gear to 120km/h. This is all about this car, really good car. But would reccomend E-class 124 more. Primary Use: Commuting to work | ||
|
Graham writes:
1996 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Review
Proseverything Consnothing
45
Nice Car — Total quality, the drive is second to none, sports mode is awsome. Fuel consumption is brill, average 31 mpg, Insurance is low, Auto box is smooth, the growl is very comforting along with the very responsive engine. Alot of car for little money......I will next get an avantgard. Primary Use: Family transportation | ||
|
Robert67 writes:
1996 Mercedes-Benz C-Class C220 Review
ProsLow fuel usage, good looks, good space ConsNot as much street cred as an E Class
45
C200 - Better That Anything From The Asia Auto Makers. — Just look at this cute, medium sized thing. Its what every family needs, not to big, not too small, its just right. It has enough power to overtake and scramble up hills, but at the same time it has wallet-friendly fuel usage. Lots of little extras make driving more fun, and as always, Mercedes build quality leaves nothing to be desired. Primary Use: Commuting to work | ||
|
jessedeefy writes:
1996 Mercedes-Benz C-Class C280 Review
ProsAesthetically pleasing, comfortable seats, good storage space. ConsLow MPG, breaks are tough, expensive repairs. 
25
| ||
|
Matt writes:
1996 Mercedes-Benz C-Class C280 Review
ProsIt's a Mercedes! Conssome have wire harness deterioration issues
1,035
It Would Be Great With A 5 Speed Manual Option — Excellent car. I like the W202 styling and performance. The interior, as almost all Mercedes, is very durable and comfortable. Great performance out of the 2.8 straight six. Various trim options, mine was the sport model and an upgrade CD player from a Lotus. Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.) | ||
|
stoli2266 writes:
1996 Mercedes-Benz C-Class C280 Review
Proscomfort Consgas mileage 
25
Looks Like A Grandma Car But Drives Like A Sport Car. — Great performance but it does not get the best gas mileage. I have owned my 1996 for two year and have only had to add a Water Pump. The car is east to drive. At 13 years old get ready. Primary Use: Commuting to work | ||
|
Mario writes:
1996 Mercedes-Benz C-Class C220 Review
ProsTechnical simply, but with all important modern such as ABS, 2 airbags... ConsLacks power on hills and on european highways, specially fully loaded.
55
Workhorse For City Or Plain Land. — It was 70kW diesel with 16 valves without turbocharging. With 18" wheels looks far sportier than it was. But it was used for traveling to work. Needed some reapirs due oldness, interior in ATP Tour Esprit looks great. Consumes average 7,2L dieselfuel pro 100km. | ||
|
Ian writes:
1996 Mercedes-Benz C-Class C280 Review
ProsBuild Quality & Performance ConsHigh Running costs
75
Mercedes C280 Elegance 1996 — Great performance from an auto, fantastic build quality, probably the last good one before the rot set in.High maintenance costs but worth it for that feeling you get when driving a Mercedes.Not the best looking car in the world but not ugly by any means. It`ll be a C43 next.....can`t wait! |
|
Looking for a Used C-Class in your area?
CarGurus has 21,125 nationwide C-Class listings
starting at $3,099.
|