Sign in | Register | My account |

1992 Volvo 460 User Reviews

1992 Volvo 460 Review Ratings

  • Review your car

Average Ratings from 3 reviews

  • Performance:4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars4 out of 5 stars 4 / 5
  • Appearance:3.7 out of 5 stars3.7 out of 5 stars3.7 out of 5 stars3.7 out of 5 stars3.7 out of 5 stars 3.7 / 5
  • Build Quality:2.7 out of 5 stars2.7 out of 5 stars2.7 out of 5 stars2.7 out of 5 stars2.7 out of 5 stars 2.7 / 5
  • Overall: 3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars3.3 out of 5 stars 3.3 / 5

Review Highlights Click to filter reviews below

PROS
"power" 2 reviews

User Reviews

Displaying all 3 1992 Volvo 460 reviews.

Juha writes:
1992 Volvo 460 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
3

Pros

Excellent performance for its age, class and displacement, good mileage

Cons

If you hate frenchies, because this car is technically a Renault.

25

Most Bang For Buck If You Want A Car From Price Between 500-1000€. — Lovely feeling of acceleration when the turbocharger charges from low (1750->) revs. Acceleration from 80kmh to 120kmh is excellent for its displacement. in other words the car has good low rpm torque (185nm@1750-4500 stock). It only has 120hp stock, but boosting of performance is easy; just turn the wastegate rod and get way more power and torque to 3500-5500rpm area. Also lightweight (only 1070kgs). So don't just look at the numbers of the engine or you'll leave behind! Good handling at turns, although too mild regular suspension kills the loveliness in corners. Unclear feeling at middle part of steering, so driving on highway is not as pleasing as it would be in a bigger Volvo. Also the regular seat doesn't offer much of side support. Brakes are effective and have good feel. Rusts like a 80's japanese and electricity bucks like in a french car. Quality way behind big Volvos. Speaking of turbocharged cars, this isn't a thirsty one 7,5-8 litres/100 km combined if in good shape. Cheap to purchase, cheap spare parts, cheap tuning. The car is wonderful when all troubles (eg. troubling instrument panel) are fixed. This was for the 1,7 turbo variant of Volvo 460. Otherwise look my Volvo 460 2,0 SE

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Juha writes:
1992 Volvo 460 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
3

Pros

High mileage, good performance

Cons

If you don't like Volvos, especially little ones.

25

Good, Cheap To Buy And Compared To It's Price It Has Good Performance. — I like its performance, high mileage, driveability, looks, equipment, seats, low revs on highway. etc. What I dislike in it is that the quality is not comparable to other Volvos. I don't like its chassis, because it's too soft for me.

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Jurgen writes:
1992 Volvo 460 Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
4

Pros

Comfortable

Cons

Strong...only in accidents...

35

Volvo 460 1.8 — It has proved to be a very reliable car that also gives a rather save feeling to drive. Even though it doesn't seem to be a very fast car at first, it can be surprisingly vivid with the throttle pushed down. It is a bit thirsty perhaps. But it ran on LPG so... I like the leather interior, but the suspension is pretty though and too soft at the back. Resulting in driving with the springs completely down when you take a few friends and some luggage. The original Volvo radio is very nice. The gearbox-changes are pretty difficult when it's cold. It gets better when warmed up, but the first always is rather hard to get into (worn synchros?) and the fifth isn't always easy to find.

Primary Use: Family transportation

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Displaying all 3 1992 Volvo 460 reviews.

Review your car

Reviews From Other Years

1996 Volvo 460 Reviews

Good First Car.. Nothing More Than That By Lønne

This car is a good vehicle and it's a kind of a pretty Volvo. Not a high performance car but a solid one. It's a 1.8 liter single injection with 109 hp and about 170 nm. So, that's a little bit about ... Read More

Butifule By storm

it is an amazing car, it never whant's to give opp. when som ting brak it is issy to fiks. i can bay parts from evrey car store, end it is realy simpley to build a stereo in teh car. Read More

Read all 3 1996 Volvo 460 reviews

1995 Volvo 460 Reviews

Good Car But Don't Expect It To Be A Sportscar. By Ulrik

Performance is virtually non existing. It is kind of slow, the braking is acceptable and the handling is horrible (I have to mount a rear roll bar.) I made quite a lot of repairs on the car, intake ga... Read More

Solid Basics By Sauli

- Performance: Nothing surprising in it's performance; about 8-9s 0-100km/h, nothing wrong with brakes.. Handling is precise, even too precise when driving 60km/h or faster. - Build Quality: Only so... Read More

Read all 1995 Volvo 460 reviews

1994 Volvo 460 Reviews

Car For A Lifetime... Can't Sell It. By RGK

Good looking, confortable car, relatively good driving. Slow acceleration response, low mileage (no more than 6 Km/liter), rather squeaky for my taste. Worst part: forward train b/c the terminals have... Read More

Read all 1994 Volvo 460 reviews

1991 Volvo 460 Reviews

French Volvo. By Danger-Dan

Cheap, crappy car. Not a Volvo in it's means but was reliable the time I had to drive it. Worked fine and ran fine. Quite good fuel economy for such a old car with 1.7l engine. On the inside everythi... Read More

Most Surprising Car I Have Owned... By John

This car was a Volvo 460 Turbo, with a 1.7 litre petrol engine. 0-60 in around 7 seconds and top end of (in excess of) 135MPH. Very solid with handling and taught me alot about aggresive driving. It a... Read More

Read all 1991 Volvo 460 reviews

1990 Volvo 460 Reviews

An Underestimated One By Philippe

I should have gone for the turbocharged version, if budget had only permitted. But the 460 GLE I owned was real fun to drive around, and easy to handle. Read More

Read all 1990 Volvo 460 reviews