Change is constant. Rally against it all you want, but it won’t do you any good. Change characterizes how the world has worked, how the world currently works, and how the world will work in the future.
Right now, following a century of transportation solutions largely dependent upon gasoline, the automotive industry is grappling with more change than is usual. Google wants to build autonomous cars without steering wheels. Several automakers are building fuel-cell cars that emit nothing but water vapor into the atmosphere. Tesla is building electric cars that travel substantial distances without requiring a recharge.
And average consumers are skeptical...about all of it.
To the typical car buyer, predictions about the future of personal mobility represent a sideshow blending the fantasy of “The Jetsons” with the environmental militancy of Greenpeace, starring Edward Snowden.
Some people, however, might find self-driving cars with built-in valet service intriguing…until they get stuck standing in the rain waiting for a traffic jam of smart vehicles to dutifully exit the mall’s parking garage. They might find fuel-cell vehicles appealing…as long as they live in California near one of a handful of hydrogen filling stations. They might find electric cars compelling…until they run out of battery 20 miles from home and the nearest charging station is either occupied, broken, or too far away.
Fear of inconvenience, combined with fear of change, limits the appeal of piloted driving technology, fuel-cell cars, and pure electric vehicles. Even so-called early adopters who are ready for a different mode of transportation between Points A and B can’t help but wonder: “What if?”
Chevrolet’s redesigned 2016 Volt is a soothing answer to fuel-related “what if” scenarios, representing a perfect bridge between gasoline and whatever energy source we are going to use in the future.
While I am a fan of fuel-cell technology, it's going to take a long time to build an infrastructure to support it. This situation means that electricity is the more viable short-term alternative to gasoline.
The problem with electric cars is that you need to stop and recharge them, usually after 100 miles or less of driving (though this is changing thanks to Chevrolet’s new Bolt and Tesla). Plus, recharging takes longer than refueling a gasoline engine, even if you plug in with a municipal fast-charger. Furthermore, sometimes you arrive at a bank of electric car chargers and there isn’t one available, a problem I’ve had in Santa Monica, Calif., parking garages.
All these downsides to EV ownership can add unnecessary anxiety and stress to your life.
Chevrolet’s legitimately brilliant solution to making your life greener and easier at the same time is the 2016 Volt, an electric vehicle with a range-extending gasoline generator. It uses nothing but electricity for most commutes and errands, but when something comes up that requires longer-distance travel, or you can’t find access to a charger when the battery gets low, the Volt also burns gasoline to power its generator, which means it doesn’t suffer the limitations associated with other electric cars.
But wait, you’re saying. Don’t plug-in hybrid cars do the same thing?
Yes, but right now plug-in hybrids provide much shorter electric driving range, typically half of what the Volt provides or less. Thus, the average person ends up using more fuel than they would with the Volt. In fact, Chevrolet estimates that the average Volt owner will need to stop at a gas station once every 1,000 miles, as long as they’re recharging the car on a regular basis.
We’ll discuss how the Volt works in greater detail in the sections that follow. In the meantime, let’s talk about pricing and our specific test car.
Chevrolet offers the Volt in LT and Premier trim, the base price amounting to $33,995 including the destination charge. A federal tax credit of $7,500 effectively reduces the price to $26,495, and if you live in California, a rebate of $1,500 brings the cost even lower, to $24,995. Plus, you’ll get a carpool-lane access sticker that helps to avoid traffic in places like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego.
My Mosaic Black test car had Premier trim, which requires a $4,350 premium. It pays for leather upholstery, heated front and rear seats, heated side mirrors, a heated steering wheel, and a Bose premium sound system. Additionally, the Volt Premier is equipped with wireless device charging, automatic parking assist for parallel and perpendicular spaces, and machined finish aluminum wheels.
To this, my Volt added both of the Driver Confidence option packages ($990), installing forward-collision warning with low-speed automatic emergency braking, lane-departure warning and lane-keeping assist systems, a blind-spot warning and lane-change alert system, rear cross-traffic alert, and automatic high-beam headlights. For the price, the upgrades represent a strong value. Add a navigation system, and my test car’s window sticker read $39,830 ($30,830 after the federal credit and California rebate).
More conventional in appearance, the new Chevy Volt shows a strong family resemblance to the redesigned 2016 Cruze. While this change results in an appealing automobile, at the same time it eliminates styling as a Volt differentiator. While cruising (I’m sorry) around Los Angeles, I saw plenty of first-generation Volts on the road, and they all looked different from everything else. My 2016 Volt, aside from its shiny silver grille, got lost in the motorized sea that is the 405 freeway.
If I find the 2016 Volt’s exterior styling less distinctive than before, the interior is a massive improvement over the old car. It, too, is more conservative in terms of design and execution, but the tones, textures, and finishes will age well, and the Volt is loaded with the latest technology. Where the original Volt’s cabin appeared to take design inspiration from the original Apple iMac, this new one is comparatively Germanic in terms of look and feel.