Mazda CX-5 vs Nissan Rogue Hybrid
Overview | |
MSRP$29,300 | MSRP$26,240 |
Average price$22,728 | Average price |
Listings9562 | Listings28 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Expert reviews7.7 out of 10 | Expert reviews6.3 out of 10 |
Pros
| |
Reviews SummaryThough Mazda hasn’t redesigned its popular compact crossover SUV since 2017, a program of continuous refinement makes the 2024 CX-5 better than ever. It might even be too good. It has shared showroom space with the similarly sized Mazda CX-50 model since last year but continues to outsell its newer and slightly more expensive sibling. As it turns out, there are numerous reasons for that. Verdict: Mazda positions the CX-5 as an SUV for active urbanites, and it serves perfectly in its role. Stylish design, taut dimensions, excellent outward visibility, a comfortable cabin, commendable quality, and impressive safety ratings make it a great choice. Plus, the 2024 Mazda CX-5 is genuinely enjoyable to drive. | |
Reviews SummarySeems like everybody wants a compact crossover SUV, and among them the 2017 Nissan Rogue presents a compelling case for purchase. It looks sharp, it’s got a roomy interior, and the price is right. Plus, for 2017, a new hybrid version arrives, along with fortifications on the driver-assistance and collision-avoidance technology front. These changes, however, may not prove substantial enough to keep this aging model on consumer radar screens. | |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine | Engine2.0L 176 hp I4 Hybrid |
Drive Train | Drive TrainFWD |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
MPG City | MPG City33 |
MPG Highway | MPG Highway35 |
Engine | |
Engine Name2.5L 187 hp I4 | Engine Name2.0L 176 hp I4 Hybrid |
Torque185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | Torque |
Horsepower187 hp @ 6000 rpm | Horsepower |
DrivetrainAWD | DrivetrainFWD |
Fuel Economy | |
MPG City | MPG City33 |
MPG Highway | MPG Highway35 |
Interior | |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity5 |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall5 | Front Crash Overall4 |
Side Crash Overall5 | Side Crash Overall |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space30.0 cu ft | Cargo Space27.3 cu ft |
Curb Weight3783 lbs | Curb Weight3624 lbs |
Height66.1 in | Height66.3 in |
Length180.1 in | Length184.5 in |
Width83.3 in | Width72.4 in |
Wheelbase106.2 in | Wheelbase106.5 in |
Maximum Payload941 lbs | Maximum Payload1096 lbs |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity2000 lbs | Maximum Towing Capacity |
Overview | ||
MSRP | $29,300 | $26,240 |
Average price | $22,728 | |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | 4.7 | 4.8 |
Expert reviews | 7.7 out of 10Read full review | 6.3 out of 10Read full review |
Pros & cons | Pros
| |
Summary | Though Mazda hasn’t redesigned its popular compact crossover SUV since 2017, a program of continuous refinement makes the 2024 CX-5 better than ever. It might even be too good. It has shared showroom space with the similarly sized Mazda CX-50 model since last year but continues to outsell its newer and slightly more expensive sibling. As it turns out, there are numerous reasons for that. Verdict: Mazda positions the CX-5 as an SUV for active urbanites, and it serves perfectly in its role. Stylish design, taut dimensions, excellent outward visibility, a comfortable cabin, commendable quality, and impressive safety ratings make it a great choice. Plus, the 2024 Mazda CX-5 is genuinely enjoyable to drive. | Seems like everybody wants a compact crossover SUV, and among them the 2017 Nissan Rogue presents a compelling case for purchase. It looks sharp, it’s got a roomy interior, and the price is right. Plus, for 2017, a new hybrid version arrives, along with fortifications on the driver-assistance and collision-avoidance technology front. These changes, however, may not prove substantial enough to keep this aging model on consumer radar screens. |
Video | ||
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 2.0L 176 hp I4 Hybrid | |
Drive Train | FWD | |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
MPG City | 33 | |
MPG Highway | 35 | |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 2.5L 187 hp I4 | 2.0L 176 hp I4 Hybrid |
Torque | 185 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm | |
Horsepower | 187 hp @ 6000 rpm | |
Drivetrain | AWD | FWD |
Fuel Economy | ||
MPG City | 33 | |
MPG Highway | 35 | |
Interior | ||
Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 5 | 4 |
Side Crash Overall | 5 | |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 30.0 cu ft | 27.3 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 3783 lbs | 3624 lbs |
Height | 66.1 in | 66.3 in |
Length | 180.1 in | 184.5 in |
Width | 83.3 in | 72.4 in |
Wheelbase | 106.2 in | 106.5 in |
Maximum Payload | 941 lbs | 1096 lbs |
Number of doors | 4 | 4 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | 2000 lbs | |
By: CarGurus + AI
This car comparison has been created with using generative AI. It is based entirely on CarGurus expert review content, ratings and data, and leverages our extensive library of hands-on product tests to create thousands of unique comparisons to help shoppers choose the right car.