Have you driven a 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class?  

User Reviews

View reviews where users commented on categories.

Clear selections

Displaying 11 - 20 of 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 20 reviews.

2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class CLK 430 CabrioletReview
Steveb81005 writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Great $55k Car For A Fraction Of The Price Now — This car is beautiful and accelerates 0-80 in like 2 seconds! Well, not really, but it seems like it. White paint is like glass, and the interior is solid. It's fun to drive and gets looks all day. The convertible top is very simple and fast.

Pros: Acceleration, looks, handling

Cons: Trunk space, back seat space

5 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class CLK 430 CabrioletReview
Peter writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

2000 Mercedes Clk 430cab Sure Delivers... — Having owned several 4 seat convertbiles in the past (Saab Turbo, CLK,etc.), the CLK 430 Cab offers the best mix of performance, style and reliability. The V-8 never fails to deliver, the interior is a bit dressed up over some other cars, the ride is sporty but more comfortable then an M3, and I cannot stand the look of the new ones. The rear end doesn't work for me, so I continue to hang onto this model and enjoy it every day. With the top up, you wouldn't even know you were in a convertible..quiet and solid.

Pros: performance, comfort, room, appearance

Cons: nothing of significance

4 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class CLK 320 CoupeReview
Glenn writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Merc Clk — fast and furious!!! awesome colour and suberb build quality...... never lets me down, gutsy on petrol when peddle is to the metal which is all the time :) Kompressor engine! Rear wheel drive for a true petrol head. Top speed is 149mph.....and it does it. Want another one soon to customise, xlent!

Pros: headturner

Cons: none

1 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class CLK 320 CoupeReview
Waqas writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

I Have A Silver Clk And Its Just Charming — with automatic transmission this car could do 0-100 in 10.1 seconds and its not even new. put the car in gear sit back and relax the drive,,, but occassionaly you have to make your presence felt by putting pressure on the accelature. if you like driving a coupe, you would love to drive CLK

Pros: a merc coupe, lovely,smooth drive, reliable, high quality, spacy back seats,

Cons: expensive serivce and mantinance, some unnecessary controls, aviliable only with big engines.

5 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class CLK 320 CabrioletReview
RLG writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

The Benz That Benz Owners Look At Twice. — We bought our Benz 3 years ago. It was 5 years old but only had 38,000 miles on it. We've been completely happy with the car and have only recently begun having a problem with the soft top (question posted). It's a dream to drive (not the cushy American-car ride) and handles beautifully. The turning radius is the shortest we've ever experienced. And looks ... we've only seen one other Benz in Mineral Green and it was a hard top. Our Benz causes even other Benz owners to do a double take.

Owner for 2 years, 6 months

Miles Driven per Year:20,000

Cons: None so far.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class CLK 430 CoupeReview
Stephen writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

My Horrible Review Of A Clk 430 (dont Read It Lol) — the clk-430 is a beautiful car. it has great handling, braking, and acceleration. i dont know about others, but i have experienced 0-60 times of around 5.5-5.7 seconds. the one thing that would make this car even better would be a manual transmission with a clutch.

Pros: its the most beautiful car :D
lasts long, looks better than current clk's

Cons: expensive, auto transmission

2 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class CLK 430 CabrioletReview
Dino writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Miami Car.... — Great convertible, great power and a real looker...White on white with the grey top.

Pros: Sexy

Cons: Small backseat...

2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class CLK 320 CoupeReview
Mike writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Great Car, Very Quick — Its a Mercedes theres not much to say other than great German engineering.

Pros: Very fast, great on gas, engine still runs strong even at 140,000 miles great car

Cons: Bad in the winter, over time mechanical problems will occur.

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class CLK 430 CoupeReview
Greg writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

My Dream Car — I've always wanted it just b/c of the looks. It drove awesome. surprisingly good in the winter. Comfortable, powerful.

Pros: Looks say it all.

Cons: Not able to import US model

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class CLK 320 CabrioletReview
Susy writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Superficial Love — Beautiful on the outside - a wreck on the inside - it was out of warranty and time bomb = money drain...but I just had to get it after i earned my chemical engineering degree no matter what it cost...needless to say, I grew out of that three years later.

Pros: ego booster

Cons: money drainer

1 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying 11 - 20 of 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 20 reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class Reviews

Review By buyerbeware72

Over priced by at least $1000. for a car with over 100,00 miles and 4 owners, smells like trouble Read More

Review By Shawn

I thought it was a fair price for the car I just couldnt get my car sold in time to buy it Read More

2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class Reviews

Review By Guru9FJSW

Great styling. Great handling. Overall good value. Expect to enjoy it for many years. Read More

Review By Byron

Not quiet an SLK 350 but very desirable. Reasonably priced and fun to own Read More

2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class Reviews

Review By KCKing1975

Do the math. Most of these cars are over 15 years old and high miles. The maintenance alone is very expensive. I owned a 2005 which was unreliable. Read More

Review By E Chanlyn

While I have only driven sports coupes my entire life, as I move up the ladder, Im really enjoying the ride. My prior vehicl a 2003 CLK500 was nowhere this 2007 CLK550. The 550 feels much more solid a... Read More

2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class Reviews

Review By Ronald

It was perfect and did not look its age.It was slightly over priced but a rare find. Read More

Review By Darryl

Great brand, clean and good price good mileage Read More

2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class Reviews

Review By cliff

I like this car it drives very nice but I think its going to be expensive to maintain Read More

Review By Guru9Y8KVK

My wife loves it. Everything about it so far is great. Oil change is expensive, but she loves it Read More

CLK-Class

Looking for a Used CLK-Class in your area?

CarGurus has 470 nationwide CLK-Class listings starting at $3,750.

ZIP:
Have you driven a 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class?