Have you driven a 1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class?  

User Reviews

View reviews where users commented on categories.

Clear selections

Displaying 21 - 26 of 1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class 26 reviews.

1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 320 4MATICReview
Suzi writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Good Big Car — A good family car although don't get an early model as a few problems with them

Pros: lots of space

Cons: early ones have problems

2 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 320 4MATICReview
bahman writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Very Reliable, With Decent Cargo Room In The Back.. — I like this car a lot and wanted a reliable SUV with a decent cargo room in the back. This car has been very good to me and knock on wood have not had any issues with it. I currently have about 100K miles on it and it is driving nicely. The only major issue was with the central locking system. I do recommend this car. The newer models are even better stocked with features and look much nicer too.

Owner for 5 years, 0 months

Miles Driven per Year:15,000

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 320 4MATICReview
gregorybrogers writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

277,000 Miles And Still Going Strong Is All I Have To Say — Overall 1 ,outstanding vehicle. I just replaced the tranny and fuel pump at 268k miles and the tranny had a broken Plantetary gear, which the 3 times it was dragged onto a flat bed tow truck due to illlegal parking could not have helped. The Cats went out a 263k miles. And I just replaced both front wheel bearings last week at 277k. Outside of general maintenance and those 3 window switch replacement, I could not as for more. I know I'll see 300k easy in her or more.

Owner for 6 years, 0 months

Miles Driven per Year:40,000

4 of 4 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 430 4MATICReview
carGrrl writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Cool Car To Drive, But Truck-like — I took this car for a test drive and could not get over how smoothly it drove...until we tried to take a corner. Then it felt decidely truck-like. Other than that, the car was very Mercedes-like, with wonderfully soft leather. The cupholders are a bit chinzy looking, but otherwise, a great car!

Owner for 0 years, 0 months

Miles Driven per Year:0

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 430 4MATIC Review
Laser_1567 says:
vs2005 Jaguar S-TYPE
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 430 4MATIC winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
Power Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"First off its an 8 cylinder but mostly you can feel the instant rush the second you accelerate "
Handling Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"The ML430 is not over engineered with steering gizmos such as the pivoting rear axle "
Looks/Style Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE better.
"Again totally different vehicles, the Jaguar has beautiful lines and is distinctive in a way all its own "
Front Seats Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"Ive rethought that, the Jaguar was more comfortable but the placement of the ebrake was something to beware"
Back Seats Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"Simply more room"
Cargo Capacity Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"The Jaguar had a hard to get anything large in the back seat and not enough trunk space"
Family Car Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"More practical and great for weekend getaways with friends and or family "
Value Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"Its a more practical vehicle and still has the feel of luxury "
Would Buy Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"For the quality and engineering "
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 320 4MATIC Review
Michelle says:
vs2003 INFINITI FX35 AWD
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 320 4MATIC winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
Power Ranked 2003 INFINITI FX35 AWD better.
"The Z-car engine. "
Cargo Capacity Ranked 2003 INFINITI FX35 AWD worse.
"The Mercedes has more space roof to floor in the back, since its square. So theres more room."

Displaying 21 - 26 of 1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class 26 reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2015 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Reviews

Review By Guru94SWV8

The BMW X3 is more powerful on the road. But the ML 350 is sexier and more luxurious. Decisions decisions... Read More

Review By Jim

I purchased this car for my wife last week. Hands down the most elegant, well equipped car weve ever owned. Read More

2014 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Reviews

Review By Sallomon15

Cest juste la couleur qui ne me plait pas. Tout le reste me satisfait pleinement! Read More

Review By Roc

Nice interior; common right side arm rest latching problem though. Read More

2013 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Reviews

Review By Guru9C5LSN

Very clean fairy priced fully loaded Extremely eye catching. Everything a family would need Read More

Review By Guru9YJV27

Nice and smooth. Good for families. Plenty of space Read More

2012 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Reviews

Review By Guru9XKYB8

Great Classic SUV still searching for a Good Deal Read More

Review By Guru9WHPM5

Very nice, definitely worth the price. Comfortable and well thought out design. Read More

2011 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Reviews

Review By David

For as Large as it is it drives like a car. But its so much easier to get into or out of than a low sitting car. I will own one someday. But for now I need my truck. I just got a large dog and he stol... Read More

Review By Guru95RMBN

a good model has good capacity turning comfortable ride Read More

M-Class

Looking for a Used M-Class in your area?

CarGurus has 2,114 nationwide M-Class listings starting at $999.

ZIP:
Have you driven a 1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class?