Have you driven a 1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class?  

User Reviews

View reviews where users commented on categories.

Clear selections

Displaying 21 - 26 of 1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class 26 reviews.

1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 320 4MATICReview
Suzi writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Good Big Car — A good family car although don't get an early model as a few problems with them

Pros: lots of space

Cons: early ones have problems

2 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 320 4MATICReview
bahman writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Very Reliable, With Decent Cargo Room In The Back.. — I like this car a lot and wanted a reliable SUV with a decent cargo room in the back. This car has been very good to me and knock on wood have not had any issues with it. I currently have about 100K miles on it and it is driving nicely. The only major issue was with the central locking system. I do recommend this car. The newer models are even better stocked with features and look much nicer too.

Owner for 5 years, 0 months

Miles Driven per Year:15,000

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 320 4MATICReview
gregorybrogers writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

277,000 Miles And Still Going Strong Is All I Have To Say — Overall 1 ,outstanding vehicle. I just replaced the tranny and fuel pump at 268k miles and the tranny had a broken Plantetary gear, which the 3 times it was dragged onto a flat bed tow truck due to illlegal parking could not have helped. The Cats went out a 263k miles. And I just replaced both front wheel bearings last week at 277k. Outside of general maintenance and those 3 window switch replacement, I could not as for more. I know I'll see 300k easy in her or more.

Owner for 6 years, 0 months

Miles Driven per Year:40,000

4 of 4 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 430 4MATICReview
carGrrl writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Cool Car To Drive, But Truck-like — I took this car for a test drive and could not get over how smoothly it drove...until we tried to take a corner. Then it felt decidely truck-like. Other than that, the car was very Mercedes-like, with wonderfully soft leather. The cupholders are a bit chinzy looking, but otherwise, a great car!

Owner for 0 years, 0 months

Miles Driven per Year:0

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 430 4MATIC Review
Laser_1567 says:
vs2005 Jaguar S-TYPE
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 430 4MATIC winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
Power Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"First off its an 8 cylinder but mostly you can feel the instant rush the second you accelerate "
Handling Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"The ML430 is not over engineered with steering gizmos such as the pivoting rear axle "
Looks/Style Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE better.
"Again totally different vehicles, the Jaguar has beautiful lines and is distinctive in a way all its own "
Front Seats Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"Ive rethought that, the Jaguar was more comfortable but the placement of the ebrake was something to beware"
Back Seats Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"Simply more room"
Cargo Capacity Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"The Jaguar had a hard to get anything large in the back seat and not enough trunk space"
Family Car Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"More practical and great for weekend getaways with friends and or family "
Value Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"Its a more practical vehicle and still has the feel of luxury "
Would Buy Ranked 2005 Jaguar S-TYPE worse.
"For the quality and engineering "
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 320 4MATIC Review
Michelle says:
vs2003 INFINITI FX35 AWD
1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class ML 320 4MATIC winning categories:
  • Power
  • Handling
  • Looks/Style
  • Front Seats
  • Back Seats
  • Cargo Capacity
  • Family Car
  • Value
  • Would Buy
Power Ranked 2003 INFINITI FX35 AWD better.
"The Z-car engine. "
Cargo Capacity Ranked 2003 INFINITI FX35 AWD worse.
"The Mercedes has more space roof to floor in the back, since its square. So theres more room."

Displaying 21 - 26 of 1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class 26 reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2015 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Reviews

Review By David

These are solid suv. We have 2. One has almost 200k. Nothing fancy, but you need to keep up with maintenance Read More

Review By Guru9KMT4X

The price is little bit high. Charge for delivery is little bit high too. Read More

2014 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Reviews

Review By bhavsark

Very well maintained and full featured, one can enjoy Read More

Review By Guru9DR9KF

Great vehicle. Solid build. Nice appointments. Gas mileage could be better. Read More

2013 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Reviews

Review By Guru98JL9Y

This is my second ML and third blue tech vehicle. I love the power and MPG. It accelerates faster than my grand Cherokee with 360HP yet gets double the MPG. The 7 speed auto tows boats with ease and t... Read More

Review By Bassface123

Nice suv I like that its a rear wheel drive, my Lincoln mkx is nice too, but tranny issues have out it out to rest Read More

2012 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Reviews

Review By Walter

Fantastic car/truck! Very smooth ride use the correct Michelin tires Read More

Review By Big_Mike25

Amazing power and torque. Fit and finish are excellent! Read More

2011 Mercedes-Benz M-Class Reviews

Review By Keith

Great looking car. Features were very nice. Maintained in good condition. Read More

Review By DBarcelo

I viewed three ML350s. Two were 4-Matic and the one I ultimately purchased was a base model. The 4Matic has a lot of bells and whistles, but the ones I saw had a lot of problems, like falling headline... Read More

M-Class

Looking for a Used M-Class in your area?

CarGurus has 2,295 nationwide M-Class listings starting at $1,999.

ZIP:
Have you driven a 1999 Mercedes-Benz M-Class?