1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class User Reviews

Have you driven a 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class?  
Rank This Car

User Reviews

Displaying all 4 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class reviews.

1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK320 Coupe Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
25

Princess Mercedes — very nice car from mercedes benz concern. build with quality and passion. cupe style which never get bored. very nice leather interior. my engine is 2liter non kompresor so its weak point of this car. dont need repairs but is slow.

Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)

Pros: mercedes star that you proud of

Cons: dont take small engine

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK320 Coupe Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
35

Looks And Luxury But It'll Cost You! — This is a fantastic car to drive due to its sporty but smooth ride and the sports auto gearbox makes it especially enjoyable. This car has every luxury imaginable from heated electric leather seats to the twin climate control system, it wants for nothing. Not many sports coupes come better looking than this one and with the added AMG extras it definitely stands out from the crowd. Sadly all this luxury and comfort comes at a price of £50,000 new so if you want one you'd better save your pennies!

Pros: Very luxurious

Cons: Costs a fair few quid new and petrol isn't cheap but then what do you expect from a 3.2
V6?!

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK320 Coupe Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
35

Safety, Class, Economy In One Beautiful And Eyecatching Piece Of Engineering — Have basic model, auto. Wonderful to drive, everthing to hand; cruises quietly and with supreme comfort; powers into life effortlessly; brilliant road holding; masses of room in comfort; extremely spacious rear passenger seats and legroom; cavernous boot holds multi golf clubs and shopping - drop down seats and compartment allows carriage of long items. A real good looking car which everyone admires. Good fuel economy, particularly for the 320 and fully comp. insurance for me of £400 p.a. What more can I say - next car? A CLK, of course!

Owner for 3 years, 0 months

Miles Driven per Year:10,000

Pros: Comfort, safety, ease of driving, economy, eyecatching quality.

Cons: People seem to want to vandalise it! Not absolutely ideal for carting aged parent around at times.  Air mass sensor just been replaced - an apparent common fault!

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
155

Stylish But Expensive To Run. — The 200K engine isn't amazingly fast but it's good enough. 5-speed manual gearbox isn't great but does the job. The Elegance trim offers enough in terms of equipment. The suspension is set up for comfortable cruising, feels too soft in some of the faster corners.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: Style, Badge

Cons: Gearbox, Prices

3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying all 4 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class Reviews

Best Car I Have Owned! By JoeMillican

Mercedes really does build a very nice car. It looks great and very comfortable and exciting to drive. I loved driving it on the winding hilly roads with the top down, if your a convertible fan then t... Read More

It Is A Great Car, It Manages Very Nicely, Its Quiet, No Exterior Noise.extremely Comfortable. By pearlharbor5000

The thing I did not like about this car is when the tire sensor came on, which meant that one or more tires was low on air, so one has to be precise on the amount of air in the tires. It is a nice... Read More

2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class Reviews

Clk 350 Is A Masterpiece! Quality All The Way Around! By txsmoke

I purchased this vehicle used from Mercedes as a used certified trade in. Since owning it I have not experienced any major mechanical issues. It is a very powerful vehicle with immediate response to p... Read More

Beautiful ,fast ,powerful By captkp

Nothing bad i can say about this car. Its a coupe so the limited rear seat legroom is not a drawback. It is a very comfortable great handeling good looking reliable car that is a pleasure to get in an... Read More

2007 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class Reviews

An Affordable Dream Car. By Luger

Love the comfort, the good visibility, the response. It handles like a sports car, but feels like a luxury sedan. Definitely a car I can enjoy for many years to come. Only problem will be keeping ... Read More

Unique And Memorable By HaroldG

draws oohs and ahhhhs from everyone, a driver's car, seats four, unsurpassed surround sound, near new chromes are beautiful and attention grabbing, only an average of 5500 miles per year on the speedo... Read More

2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class Reviews

Great Sports Car With Superb Handling By Zogzog

Overall, the best car I have ever owned. Very-powerful 300+ horsepower and the car reall moves! . A real sleeper. Nice AMG accents and low profile Michelin tires and sharp alloy rims. Not bad fuel e... Read More

Best Car I've Ever Owned By glutes33

This car is awesome. It looks good, runs awesome and with 68000 miles, still runs like it did in 2005 when I purchased it. With the exception of scheduled maintenance and 2 sets of tires, this vehic... Read More

2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class Reviews

It's A Machine. Not A Car. By sjmnt

Very solid. Very. Not too smart to run the wiring thru the floor board. Heavy duty mats and you'll be fine. Lifters seem to be an issue around 100k mi with this particular engine. Dunno if its due to ... Read More

A Beauty To Behold With Power To Spare, By ECMC

I've owned my CLK since October of 2014. Not long after my purchase while driving on the freeway I encountered a bump at approximately 60 mph which placed my car airborne for a second or two, when it ... Read More

Cars compared to 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK-ClassPeople researching a 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class contacted a dealer about

Have you driven a 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class?  
Rank Your Car →