1997 Volvo V40Review
1997 Volvo V40 — Peformance: Very smooth, reasonably quick. Brakes are good, Handling nice and tight, unexpectedly good. Build Quality: All good. Appearence: Very nice, discreet. Cost of ownership: Good on fuel and cheap to insure Fun Factor: Lots of fun, more so probably because it is better than expected
Primary Use: Sport/fun (spirited driving, track racing, off-roading, etc.)
Pros: Good to drive, quite spacious, good MPG
Cons: Not as big as looks suggest
Looking for a Used V40 in your area?
CarGurus has 8 nationwide V40 listings and the tools to find you a great deal.
Reviews From Other Years
a bit slow to accellerate has a smaller turn ratio than my golf II Matinance is easy looks rael nige fuel consumption is 10l pr 100 km cost araund 200 euro pr year to maintain (first year) YES I'S ... Read More
Lots of turbo lag at low rpms. Confort in driver seat is les than desireable, all the others are perfect. Only seats two adults in back, but what do you expect from a entry level sedan wagon. But once... Read More
Performance: When tuned up properly and serviced regularly, even tho' it's only a "low pressure" Turbo, it ROCKS! Build Quality: What you would expect from the "entry level" of the Volvo line...it tri... Read More
Nice little wagon with upscale looks and safety features. I think its very distinctive and relatively rare on the road. I also like supporting my Scandinavian heritage. After all, they explored North ... Read More