1996 Skoda Felicia User Reviews

Have you driven a 1996 Skoda Felicia?  
Rank This Car

User Reviews

Displaying all 5 1996 Skoda Felicia reviews.

1996 Skoda FeliciaReview
Cargo Capacity:
Daily Commute:
Family Car:
Fuel Economy:
Front Seats:
Handling:
Maintenance Cost:
Price:
Power:
Reliability:
Looks/Style:
Overall:
35

Good Car For The Money And Maintenance Is Cheap — Performance - 0-62 11sec, 75HP Good and strong Build Quality Cost of Ownership - Cheap, 12-13Km/L (30,5 mpg) The car can be fun to drive, but a 1,6 with 75HP is not the funnest thing in a car but again the car only vaighes 850kg

Primary Use: Family transportation

Pros: price.

Cons: Size.

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Felicia

Looking for a Used Felicia in your area?

CarGurus has thousands of nationwide listings and the tools to find you a great deal.

ZIP:
1996 Skoda FeliciaReview
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
35

You Can't Name It As Small Car !!!!!! — inside it , it dosen't a small size car but its good and outside with no back its small for barking and car weight . but its Performance is normal and got worth by the time but by maintenance you can keep it as normal with its small engine . low acceleration and good braking . its good car for students and small families !!!!

Primary Use: Family transportation

Pros: fuel economy & size

Cons: small engine with normal Performance

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1996 Skoda FeliciaReview
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
35

Overall A Good First Car — well i don't like that it hasn't got abs or power steering which means the steering can be heavy at some times like hen you are going round one of those small roundabouts i can give you a hard time to get it round.

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: reliable

Cons: no power steering

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1996 Skoda FeliciaReview
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
35

The Ultimate — What a car, made me so much money and is still doing that partswise. What a gem of a car. How the chassis of this car was not bent as it carried so many engines and gearboxes in its day, at least one of each a day

Pros: Space and weight carrying capabilities

Cons: None

0 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No
1996 Skoda FeliciaReview
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
25

My Lil Car — i Like solidness speed size its a 5 door! big boot i Dislike not power assisted quite old the fact that one speaker is broken!! my engine coolant thing is broken But it is my first car so i ant toooo bothered, o and its fun to drive of course

Pros: its a car

Cons: OLD

Is this review helpful? Yes | No

Displaying all 5 1996 Skoda Felicia reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2001 Skoda Felicia Reviews

Good By Ibro

first gear is real good you can doo some graet burnouts the build qualiti is the best of all becouse its build by VW the styling is good it can easily be tuned its very fun car to drive specialy fo... Read More

Felicia = Reality By Kormos

This is a car, which cannot be broke. I tell u, and my friends can asure u, that I wasn't shy to test it! =) We drove it on distance, we raced with it, we tested the consuption minimum (4,2 l/100km av... Read More

1999 Skoda Felicia Reviews

Great For A First Car And Anybody Wanting To Carry Out Their Own Repairs By Dean

A great little car for when you're young because its relatively cheap to run and low performance, which means less speeding fines. The acceleration and performance up hills is poor, but has sufficient... Read More

Nice Easy Car To Drive, Good For Carrying Basic Loads By Shane

performance- the car is generally quite slow and is much more fun to drive that way. the cars braking and handling are that of expected of a family hatchback build quality- build quality is brilliant... Read More

1998 Skoda Felicia Reviews

It's Good As Your First Car But If You're Looking To Buy, Don't. By Nada

performance - accelerates very well, brakes are good too, though if you go over 100 km/hour you feel as if it's flying and you feel that control is not in your hand. build - it's needed several repair... Read More

Cheap To Run, But No Fun. By Tom

Performance - Slow acceleration, brakes are ok because they only ever have to slow the car down from slow speeds anyway. Rolls like a boat. Build Quality - Still in one piece. Sort of. Appearance - Ta... Read More

1997 Skoda Felicia Reviews

Cheap By Lars Erik

its a pickup, dosent going fast, i hate it, weak, great cargo space, cheap, dosent cost much, white, pickup, great stereo with a few mods, awsome to drive beacuse its so light in the rear so yo can ... Read More

Looking Past The Steriotype. By James

A good low budget work horse, plenty of room, not too bad on the uptake and cheap to repair. So far only a clutch and a timing chain have been required, and both were home DIY jobs (excepting that ... Read More

1995 Skoda Felicia Reviews

Not A Bad Car At All By Mike

Good Car but needs a lot of maintenance, Very solid & safe. Engine is not that powerful but not bad, It is a cheap car to own, you will have a lot of fun driving it. It is a little bit harsh car. Read More

I Love My Skoda And I Hope To Get The 1.6 Engine Of The Octavia In It By Sam

i like it when it runs smoothly and hearing my sound system and she feels me when iam angry and when iam happy and i love the ability to modify in her body, i hate the engine and hoping to get 1.6 l e... Read More

Have you driven a 1996 Skoda Felicia?  
Rank Your Car →