1995 Renault Safrane User Reviews

Have you driven a 1995 Renault Safrane?  
Rank This Car

User Reviews

1995 Renault Safrane Review
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:
95

Engine & G/box Fine In A Lighter R25, But Why Ruin This Car With Them? — This 2.2vi Executive Automatic was alright to look at, so,so comfortable, fantastic 10 disc audio system, and loads of space. 2.2 engine was weak, rough, and noisey. Made worse by an appalling gearbox, both rough changes and conpletely mismatched engine/gearbox ratios, it would change at the wrong time most of the time! Did not enjoy this car, promptly changed it for a Volvo engined & gearboxed Safrane 2.5 20valve auto - Totally different car and so much better!

Primary Use: Commuting to work

Pros: .......Comfy?

Cons: It was total rubbish!

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Safrane

Looking for a Used Safrane in your area?

CarGurus has thousands of nationwide listings and the tools to find you a great deal.

ZIP:

Reviews From Other Years

1999 Renault Safrane Reviews

Under-rated Motorway Cruiser By Mark

Not the most amazing car to look at, but for speed and comfort it is way ahead of its time. Like a wolf in sheeps clothing it can give most cars a race for their money starting away from the lights. F... Read More

1998 Renault Safrane Reviews

I Really Liked This Car, Very Comfy, Fast, Ate The Miles And Sounded Good. By Benjamin

Really fast comfortable car, 2.5 20 valve engine went really well, gear box was smooth and changed well. Had all the toys & lashings of leather, was a really good example, sold it to friends 4yrs ago... Read More

Comfortable Sedan, The French President Had One Too :-) By Деян

Solid engine in a nice car. Very smooth ride, packed with options. Performance is not its best side but should be enough for a family drive. A bit expensive to maintain, though not too difficult to af... Read More

Have you driven a 1995 Renault Safrane?  
Rank Your Car →