Have you driven a 1992 Renault Clio?  

User Reviews

Displaying all 1992 Renault Clio reviews reviews.

1992 Renault ClioReview
Mauro writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Mauro — Easy maintenance, low consumptions, a lot of space for such a small car, everything can fit in just disassemble the seats... performance is very bad but very little price, no fun driving it..unless you like to reach the limits of the car :) But very good engine, it never has problems, it's always running... slow eheh

Pros: costs

Cons: performance

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
Clio

Looking for a Used Clio in your area?

CarGurus has thousands of nationwide listings and the tools to find you a great deal.

ZIP:
1992 Renault ClioReview
Gareth writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

I Love The Clio 16v — Frustration and joy in equal amounts when I owned a Clio 16v. The 1.8 engine put oout about 150bhp and it was quite fast. i loved the three oil gauges across the dash and the bulge in the bonnet that said "I mean business". I still think of buying another on eBay as a second car.

Pros: Quick and looked great

Cons: Broke down.....lots

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1992 Renault ClioReview
Sarah writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

My First Car And I Miss Him!!! — i loved my little banger clio :) it got me around, even to nottingham!! u will be missed forever xxx

Pros: loadsa miles to the gallon :)

Cons: manual choke!!!

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1992 Renault ClioReview
Mandy writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Oh My God Stay Away!!!! — Everything, mechanically speaking, that can be plastic on it is. Doesn't take einstein to work out that before too long, they're knackered. In 5 months, I had 2 new clutches, 2 new wheels, a new alternator and a new ignition barrell. Absolute rubbish. The paint falls off in any bad weather so expect nice bits of rust appearing randomly, all the seals leak and a max speed of 50mph on a good day...

Pros: Absolutely none-many friends have had the same problems with different cars, nw and old clios...

Cons: My advice???dont ever buy one....ever....

Is this review helpful? Yes | No
1992 Renault ClioReview
Joe writes:
Appearance:
Performance:
Quality:
Overall:

Nice Car, Econimical. It Was The 1200 Rn — Nice small car, not very good at going up hills with its small engine, (lived in the Lake District with lots of hills.) Spare parts very expensive. Uncomfortable on long journeys.

Pros: Pleasent small car, it was cheap when I needed a cheap car.

Cons: It was doing a large milage, and spare parts were expensive.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Is this helpful? Yes | No

Displaying all 1992 Renault Clio reviews reviews.

Reviews From Other Years

2007 Renault Clio Reviews

Rs For Fans By Simeon

the best car for price and excitement..recommend it hot... but not a family car it just too noisy over 70mph,appearance is just great lovely 17' alloys great car for weekends,need curvy roads and s... Read More

Renaultsport 197 By Carl

well for a car of its size that pushes out 197BHP standard that aint bad and handling you would expect from a car in a lot higher price range. it looks completly different to the standard model, sure ... Read More

2006 Renault Clio Reviews

Cliomobille By Tomislav

Decent car, but not for family and long traveling. Decent handling and good mileage per gas. Quite small and not enough space in trunk! Also breaqking was not best. Don't really know why. Also even th... Read More

Cheap By Rian

its a nice car with a 1200cc motor fuel injected, very cheap on feul consumption. lovely car to take you around town. the look arent great and you can not soop it up, more then that i am very happy wh... Read More

1995 Renault Clio Reviews

Love My Clio Rsi =d By Sergio

My ride its a Renault Clio RSi '95 British Green. It's a MPFI 1.8L engine 8V with 110HP and 5 speed manual transmision. It comes with header, i only put a high performance air filter. It has in the... Read More

Not Really Powerful, Not Economic, Where Does It Fit?... By Carlos

The 80hp engine was nice to this little car! Accelerate fast enough but it's driving could be better. You can't feel much of the driving, so the pleasure and active safety it's committed. And the ec... Read More

1994 Renault Clio Reviews

Easy To Drive, Let Down By A Rather Vocal Engine On The Motorway And Expensive Parts/service By Alastair

Servicing and parts can be expensive but overall, a great car to drive with good accleration and good handling and ride, although let down by build quality in places, particularly the dash and a rathe... Read More

Ace Piece Of Machinery, Shame Had To Get Rid Of It By Elly

i like this car because its a small reliable car, it drove alright. was a nice silver colour, had sun roof, electic windows. bad thing the sun roof leaked but thats beacuse it was old. loved it lol,... Read More

1993 Renault Clio Reviews

Not Bad By Ivo

F7R engine, Koni & Billstein Suspension. High performance cheap car! The looks is not so bad, but its definetely not the best. Its Old. It has really good acceleration since it is very light and is ne... Read More

Loveable Car That Needs Constant Cares By Rafa

funniest car in corners, good build quality (we are talking about 1993 building quality) and sporty look. rallying heritage but poor reliability under abuse. Poor fuel economy. Gearbox not strong en... Read More

Have you driven a 1992 Renault Clio?